hesthefane

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

O verdadeiro golpe!

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@UHN_Plus @emd_worldwide @SimonLevyMx

[UHN Plus @UHN_Plus]

🇧🇷‼️ | Flávio Bolsonaro obtuvo cero votos en 106 secciones donde Lula sumó 14.860, según un análisis de Paris Group publicado por Folha. Además, en 3042 secciones, Flávio alcanzó como máximo los 10 votos, mientras que Lula llegó a 400 mil. Expertos en demoscopia consideran que "estadísticamente es imposible".

[Eric Trump 🇺🇲 @EricTrumpGC]

🚨URGENT: More than 8 million people were allowed to vote without using biometrics, just with "manual release by the poll worker," according to the report.

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@ThayzzySmith @emd_worldwide @SimonLevyMx @MarioNawfal @pfigueiredo08 @BolsonaroSP @SecRubio @POTUS @CarlosBolsonaro

[Conservatism And Elegance 🇺🇲 @ThayzzySmith]

🇧🇷🚨BRAZIL: An electronic voting machine was filmed automatically voting during two additional hours granted by the then Minister of the TSE (Superior Electoral Court), Cássio Nunes.

The question remains: where were those votes going?

[Martin De Luca @emd_worldwide]

What could an independent audit actually uncover about the Zanin Window?

Consider a hypothetical candidate named Lolo with privileged technical access. Lolo might attempt to substitute section results, alter aggregation records or interfere with which results were accepted. Those attempts would have to overcome safeguards and survive comparison with authentic local tallies. The Zanin Window itself would not grant that access. Nor would it erase the printed Boletins de Urna already held outside central custody.

That gives investigators a concrete test. You could compare independently preserved originals with signed electronic files, every accepted or replaced version, and the published totals. Examine administrative access and changes before, during and after the interruption.

A separate hypothesis—compromised machine software before local tallies were generated—requires different testing and would not depend on the Zanin Window.

An independent audit with international experts and observers should establish whether any records changed without justification, whether safeguards held, and whether any discrepancy could affect the outcome.

The audit must be capable of exposing manipulation—and of clearing the system if the records support it.

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@yuusocialista @hellcsweetie Respeitosa, você? "era melhor nem mostrar a cara, já que está passando vergonha disseminando fake news".
Me diz a FakeNews amada.

[Julio Schneider 🇧🇷🇺🇸 @juliovschneider]

CNN: "Lula, você não está salvando a democracia porque você é um ditador autoritário."

[Dr. Simon @goddek]

🚨🇧🇷 I DUG DEEPER INTO THE BRAZILIAN SUPREME COURT’S RECORDS, AND I DISCOVERED WHO INITIATED THE PETITION THAT HAS LED TO THE RESTRICTIONS ON FLÁVIO BOLSONARO’S PASSPORT!

Remember how the Federal Police submitted a request to seize Flávio Bolsonaro’s passports just SEVEN MINUTES after Lula’s election victory was confirmed?

Well, I started digging into the STF’s records and found something else.

On October 19, SIX DAYS BEFORE THE ELECTION, a petition was filed under case number PET 16952.

The applicant listed in the court records is Luiz Lindbergh Farias Filho (@lindberghfarias), a politician from Lula’s socialist party (PT). The respondent is Willer Tomaz de Souza, a lawyer associated with Flávio Bolsonaro.

On October 23, two days before the election, the case was assigned to Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, not through a random lottery, but through a procedure called distribuição por prevenção, meaning Moraes was considered responsible because of an earlier related proceeding.

And here’s where things get insane.

Lindbergh had also reportedly requested investigative measures involving Flávio Bolsonaro and Willer Tomaz. On October 23, Moraes ordered financial restrictions against Tomaz.

Then, on October 25, the very night Lula’s election victory was confirmed, the Federal Police requested restrictions on Flávio Bolsonaro’s passports in another proceeding, PET 16877.

The Federal Police reportedly used Flávio’s relationship with Willer Tomaz and concerns about Tomaz leaving Brazil as part of its justification.

But here’s another detail: according to reporting, the bank Santander had already informed Moraes that Flávio had never been registered as a user of a bank account that had raised investigators’ suspicions.

And yet the passport request proceeded that evening.

Now try to examine the underlying judicial documents.

ACCESS DENIED.

PET 16952 is classified under Segredo de Justiça. Even a Brazilian lawyer attempting to access its restricted documents without authorization receives an access-denied message.

We can see the filing dates. We can see the parties. We can see that Moraes received the case before the election.

But we cannot examine the documents needed to establish precisely how these proceedings were connected, what evidence was submitted, or why particular measures were considered necessary.

And that is precisely the problem.

The Brazilian Supreme Court is supposed to serve the Brazilian people. Judicial secrecy may be legally justified in some circumstances, but that cannot eliminate the need for accountability.

How are Brazilians supposed to scrutinize the actions of their highest court when crucial documents are inaccessible?

Who initiated these requests? Which earlier proceeding justified Moraes’s assignment? How exactly did PET 16952 relate to PET 16877? And what evidence ultimately justified the restrictions against Flávio Bolsonaro?

These are legitimate questions.

THE BRAZILIAN PEOPLE DESERVE ANSWERS, NOT JUST ANOTHER “ACESSO NEGADO.”

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

Precisam mais de provas??? QUEREMOS EXPLICAÇÕES TSE. RELATORIOS, METADADOS, O QUE FOR, QUEREMOS SABER O QUE FOI FEITO AS DUAS HORAS QUE FICOU TUDO PARADO

[Metrópoles @Metropoles]

➡️ ELEIÇÕES | Em 78 locais de votação, Flávio não teve votos e Lula ganhou de lavada

Leia na coluna de @taciolorran

https://t.co/veMJ5BZ3l1

[Metrópoles @Metropoles]

➡️ ELEIÇÕES | Em 78 locais de votação, Flávio não teve votos e Lula ganhou de lavada

Leia na coluna de @taciolorran

https://t.co/veMJ5BZ3l1

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@Metropoles @taciolorran MAIS UMA COISA IMPOSSÍVEL. FRAUDE ESCANCARADA

[Martin De Luca @emd_worldwide]

Many journalists are relying on the report by the @OAS_official on the Brazilian presidential election runoff to justify why the outcome should be accepted as is. The OAS report deserves to be read carefully—especially before anyone presents it as a definitive forensic answer to the Zanin Window in Brazil’s election night processing.

The OAS mission was actually quite critical of the last minute Zanin Window extension and the confusion it caused. The report does not publish a forensic reconstruction of the processing pause during the Zanin Window and does not address which systems changed, who accessed them, whether result files were replaced, or how independently preserved polling station tallies were reconciled with the final totals.

Its account of continued regional transmission also relies on information supplied by TSE technical staff. The report does not provide the underlying records needed to reconstruct each stage independently. These limits mean the report does not decisively resolve the allegation of manipulation during the Zanin Window.

What needs to happen to have confidence in the integrity of the election, which Lula badly needs if he actually won and he is to have legitimacy to govern, is to preserve the records and commission an independent technical audit with Brazilian and international forensic experts.

Publish the methods, the comparisons, the discrepancies and their explanations.

https://t.co/J5OwwmqSTo

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@folha Carta golpista é o Caralh@. SABEMOS O QUE ACONTECEU DIA 25. NÃO SOMOS IDIOTAS. NEM TODO MUNDO NO BRASIL É JUMENTO NÃO. NÓS SABEMOS SOMAR 2+2. VOCÊS PRECISAM NOS DAR UMA EXPLICAÇÃO

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@sbtnews Fraude eleitoral sim, e queremos respostas, ou voces acham que o Brasileiro é IDIOTA? IDIOTA É VOCÊS, CALADOS

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@BernieSanders Estamos sofrendo com a Fraude nas eleições por causa do Lula. Estamos vivendo numa ditadura. Venha para o Brasil, ou faça uma pesquisa de 10 minutos com a casa branca sobre o que estamos passando. TRUMP ESTÁ NOS SALVANDO. NÃO ATRAPALHE. DEIXE ELE NOS AJUDAR. ALIMENTAMOS O MUNDO

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@GloboNews QUEREMOS EXPLICACOES SOBRE AS ELEIÇÕES, ELAS FORAM FRAUDADAS E VOCÊS ESTÃO CALADOS

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@g1 QUEREMOS EXPLICACOES SOBRE AS ELEIÇÕES, ELAS FORAM FRAUDADAS E VOCÊS ESTÃO CALADOS

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@Metropoles É UM DIREITO CONSTITUIÇÃO DO SER HUMANO QUESTIONAR AS ELEIÇÕES. TEMOS MAIS QUE EVIDÊNCIAS E ACONTECIMENTOS DO QUE ACONTECEU NO DIA 25. NÃO TRATEM O BRASILEIRO COMO SE FOSSEM BURROS, NÃO SOMOS IDIOTAS

[hesthefane @Htsfny]

@Metropoles QUEREMOS EXPLICACOES SOBRE AS ELEIÇÕES, ELAS FORAM FRAUDADAS E VOCÊS ESTÃO CALADOS