Building ActorLab → AI Platform for working Actors | Multidisciplinary Scientist | Solo Founder | Brewer | Innovator | Breaking Hollywood's Tech Barrier
The company is Tombstone Dash LLC.
The "dash" = the line between birth and death on a tombstone.
A reminder to make every moment count.
For me that means shipping code daily.
What are you building?
https://t.co/Ppx6YJJjAJ
Just hit this never-before-seen hard block on the ChatGPT Mac app. 🛑
I'm all for progress, and I really hope this update brings some cool new features. But honestly? I absolutely hate when apps force a sudden sunset like this.
It’s incredibly frustrating when you’re traveling to lead a product demo, setting up your portable system on the fly, and a core tool suddenly locks you out until you download the newest version. When you spend your days designing reliable, specialized software, experiencing a forced workflow disruption with zero warning is a massive pet peeve.
Has anyone else seen this exact screen drop today? What are we hoping is on the other side of this update? 👇
#ChatGPT #UX #TechUpdates #ProductDesig
I build AI for a living.
The most useful thing I've read on it this year was a children's cartoon.
PBS Kids is quietly teaching a generation of kids how to direct powerful tools — break a problem down, give better instructions, notice when the answer is wrong, revise — before most adults can name what they're doing with AI.
The friction between intention and execution is the lesson. The handshake is the lesson.
Full essay on why Lyla in the Loop may be the most modern children's show on television right now ↓ https://t.co/bqQ10Yh7GD
The real move: infrastructure that scales while you sleep. Built a Mac Mini running Claude Code PRs 24/7. Feedback loops that never close compound faster than any single agent. System > intelligence.
The real move: infrastructure that scales while you sleep. Running Claude Code agents 24/7 on a Mac Mini. Feedback loops that never close compound faster than any single model. System intelligence > raw model intelligence.
Process mapping first, then sparingly add AI benchmarked across models. Spent 15 years building LIMS under FDA constraints—you learn fast that understanding the workflow matters more than the tool. Optimize the human loop, not the model.
Process mapping first, then sparingly add AI benchmarked across models. Built LIMS under FDA constraints 15 years—you learn fast that understanding the workflow matters more than the tool. Optimize the human loop, not the model.
Geopolitics entered AI in 2025. The real 2028 story isn't capability—it's that companies can't publish freely anymore. When governments move the goalposts, moats collapse faster. That's why iteration velocity is the only sustainable advantage.
That's not reckless compute spend—that's iteration velocity. $1.3M tokens = 30 days of thinking out loud, testing hypotheses at scale. Most founders don't spend that in 2 years of planning. The moat isn't the model. It's how fast you iterate.
The best skill is the one you shipped first. Most start broken. Document as you iterate, not before. Skills compound when you learn from real feedback, not polish specs. Speed > completeness.
The Dash between birth and death is short. Every product ships with that in mind. Not "eventually." Not "when it's perfect." Now. Ship now. Make it matter now.
PatentAlly scans your code. Checks prior art. Gives you the straight answer: patentable, probably not, or worth a conversation with a real lawyer. No fluff. No upsell. Answer.
@FarzamHejazi Exactly. That's why Claude Code repos beat prompt engineering—they remember the house rules. Every PR teaches the system something. Weird constraints, naming conventions, architectural choices. Context compounds. That's where iteration velocity lives.
Agent memory compounds. Every decision written = next cycle starts smarter. I noticed Claude Code PRs improve when repo memory tracks architecture patterns. First 5 PRs are raw. By PR 30, it understands your workflow. That's the unfair advantage—system memory learning your domain.
@sembra_ai Exactly. That's why ActorLab works—content is platform-agnostic when the core insight is authentic. Format the delivery, keep the value. Reformatting costs less than recreating the thinking.
I shipped 13 tools solo by being lazy about content distribution. Built in public on X instead. Shipped → users found it → network effect. YouTube/Instagram would have slowed iteration. Single lever beats distributed half-efforts. Platform focus > volume.
System > prompt. Architecture > execution. Built LIMS systems 15 years before AI. Lesson: the tooling matters less than workflow integration. Claude, Codex, local models—all shipped same velocity. Why? Feedback loop tightness matters more than model benchmarks. Architecture compounds.
X algo rewards consistency over virality. Posted 5 variations this week—each 3-4h feedback loop. The algo noticed: same themes, tight cycles, real engagement. Your competitor posts weekly. You've learned what works 30 times. Consistency compounds faster than luck.
Claude skills aren't about clever prompts. They're about tight feedback loops. Built 13 tools—every iteration learned something the previous version didn't. The skill compounds: system learns your domain. Prompt engineering is static. Feedback loops? They compound every cycle.
Memory loops in autonomous agents are the compound advantage. Built systems on Mac Mini—Claude Code iterates to context, I review, system learns. Feedback never closes. Your competitor: weekly ships. I: 30 iterations per cycle. The gap widens every iteration. That's iteration velocity.