@margehlas@nfxelfer@goballoutski@danceyrselfdean A school right next to a naval base. In order to prove it is a war crime you would need to prove that it was bombed with criminal recklessness and gross negligence, and its proximity to a legitimate military target makes that quite difficult. Anything else?
@dieworkwear@PDG887@beidelu1 For sure, I think my points are constrained by word count as well. I do agree that people from very humble backgrounds can dress great of course. Any critique I’m making, I hope it’s clear that it’s in good faith.
P.S. thanks for putting me onto Berg & Berg. They rock.
@dieworkwear@PDG887@beidelu1 Dressing well is either money or time. Both of those are more readily available to the well-to-do. The working class also doesn’t (usually) have time nor will to read about silhouette and drape.
You are right though that my point is most apt with respect to suiting, for sure
@dieworkwear@PDG887@beidelu1 (In the sense that while you may be correct in both cases, it generally falls into a “rich people understand, poor people don’t” dichotomy.
@dieworkwear@PDG887@beidelu1 Sadly, I think that definition is fairly widespread as relativism of taste is in vogue. I personally don’t have a problem with laughing at an idiot like Hegseth’s ugly suits, my point is that doing so isn’t much different from laughing at someone’s ungrammatical English, etc.
@dieworkwear@PDG887@beidelu1 The question for me then, is how to make clear to the average person that they can’t just walk into any store and buy a wardrobe.
Making fun of people’s incoherent social language, whether they deserve it or not, I think can be seen as a form of cultural elitism, is all.
@dieworkwear@PDG887@beidelu1 He could’ve also learned from Yohji Yamamoto or Thom Browne. But the average person of middle or lower class doesn’t care about any of these things—they just buy the sales at Nordstrom. You could argue that this archetypal buyer has become its own ugly subculture/language