I will always be grateful to American civil society and the Jewish community for standing by us, even when USA government policies always favored Pakistan. Their solidarity will never be forgotten. #bangladesh pls read
INDIA RISING UNDER SIEGE FROM THE SAME OLD ANTI-INDIA FORCES
As India/Bharat is rising nationally and internationally, the same old anti-India and anti-Hindu forces as in the earlier Delhi Riots are trying to put India down again.
It is important that the youth has proper education in Bharata Rising and what it offers at economic and cultural levels.
Do you remember the price we paid for IC-814? Not immediately, but in the subsequent years? This is the exact same thing. Compound interest will accrue over the next few years. Brace yourselves.
Cuando estés triste, recuerda que hay una diminuta proteína llamada kinesina esforzándose al máximo para mantenerte con vida.
Recorre el interior de tus células llevando de un lugar a otro los materiales que necesitan para seguir funcionando.
Mientras tú lees esto, millones de estas pequeñas proteínas trabajan sin descanso para que tu cuerpo siga funcionando. ❤️
India was the cradle of civilisation. Not one of several.
Several people have replied to my recent essay by saying there is no single cradle of civilisation. Civilisation developed independently in Mesopotamia, Egypt, India, China and South America. Why make it a competition?
This sounds like humility, but it is the same evasive move that propped up the Aryan invasion theory for a century: when the evidence becomes inconvenient, redraw the question so no evidence can ever settle it.
Consider what would have to be true for independent emergence to hold. Indus-Sarasvati merchant seals would not appear across Sumerian cities. An Akkadian cylinder seal would not name its owner as an interpreter of the Meluhhan language. Bead necklaces manufactured at Lothal would not turn up in Queen Puabi's tomb at Ur around 2450 BC. Pre-dynastic Egyptian graves at Nakada would not contain mud brick-lined pits in Sumerian and Indus-Sarasvati style, alongside cylinder seals and lapis lazuli from the northernmost Indus-Sarasvati settlement. The Sumerian scribes would not record ships arriving from Meluhha carrying timber, copper, carnelian and cotton.
All of those things happened, and they are in the archaeological record. They have been for decades.
The "independent emergence" position has a convenient feature. No evidence can ever dislodge it. Merchant seals from one civilisation found inside another become "evidence of trade, not dependency." Identical brick ratios become "convergent development." A professional interpreter role for a foreign language becomes "contact, but not influence." At every point the conclusion is decided in advance, and the evidence is arranged around it.
Others have argued that even if the civilisations were connected, Mesopotamia was still earlier. Earliest attested writing. Earliest cities. Earliest legal codes. The crucial word is "attested," which means found and recorded by archaeologists. Mesopotamia was excavated intensively from the 1840s. Mohenjo-daro was not discovered until 1922. The site at Bhirrana, dated to 7570-6200 BC, with planned streets, drainage, standardised weights and bronze metallurgy millennia before it appears elsewhere, was identified only recently. Mehrgarh, around 7000 BC, supported 20,000 people growing wheat, barley and cotton, and trading lapis lazuli and copper beads. "Earliest attested" tells you where archaeologists chose to dig, but it does not tell you what existed first.
So at what point does evidence of connection actually count? When one civilisation's merchants are living in another's cities, boring beads with their own technology and maintaining a permanent enclave at Lagash? When the Sumerian texts record ships from Meluhha bringing wealth but never once mention Sumerian ships sailing east? When Indus-Sarasvati seals are found throughout Mesopotamia but no Mesopotamian seal has ever been found in Indus-Sarasvati lands?
And that is before the underwater evidence from the Gulf of Cambay and the Tamil coast, where sonar readings suggest ports thousands of years older than anything in Mesopotamia. If those dates hold, the question of independent emergence becomes redundant.
Treating every civilisation as equally primary, whichever direction the evidence actually points, is a kind of participation trophy for entire fields of study, not open-mindedness.
Independent emergence is where one lands once you’ve already decided not to look at what moved between the geographical boxes, or in which direction. It kept the Aryan invasion theory standing for a hundred years, and it's propping up the same evasion today.
Spare me.
Pakistanis, not Indians, rape women in Greece in greater numbers.
Pakistan, not India, supports the Turkish occupation of Cyprus.
Pakistani pilots (flying Turkish jets), not Indian, violate Greek airspace.
Pakistan, not India, is the terrorist capital of the world.