If votes aren't counted until the last mail-in ballot arrives under CA law, there can be no cheating. Right now it's, 'how many votes do we need to create' and the left is SO brainwashed, they love the hurt they are creating for us, and themselves. It's Stockholm Syndrome
Despite all the big talk on the Right about the 2020 election being stolen - and it was - here is an election steal on this Administration's watch, in the broad daylight and sunshine of California, and nobody is doing a fucking thing about it.
David Friedberg: California’s Voting System Looks Fraudulent, But It’s Working Exactly as Designed
@friedberg believes California’s extremely loose election laws enable “appointments” not free elections.
Why? The voting data in LA makes no statistical sense.
“ Pratt's post-election mail-in ballots declined by 1/3.
So statistically, the population of people that send in their ballots late reduced for Pratt by 1/3, increased for Nithya Raman by 80%, and Karen Bass 10% less, if you just look at the mail-in ballots before and after election day as a comparison.
I don't know if there's a sociopolitical way that you can assess those statistics and assume that these are individuals casting their individual vote for who they think should be Mayor of LA.
Basically, the concentration of incremental votes that Nithya Raman got came around the Skid Row area in Los Angeles.
But when you look at the basic statistics of what happened in person, mail-in before, mail-in after Election Day, it becomes a real statistical quagmire on how did this sort of a sociopolitical shift happen in such a way that it did?
Now, there was a report published, and they highlighted the 2018 California midterm elections and the challenges that they saw arise in that midterm election because of some of the legislative changes that were made.
First, California Assembly Bill 1921 legalized the practice of unlimited ballot harvesting in the state. What that means is that any individual in the state of California has the right to go and collect ballots from any other individuals, regardless of relationship, fill them out, and send them in.
California, two years later, 18 months later, also passed a law that made it permanent that every person registered in the state of California would get a ballot, so tens of millions of ballots then get mailed out.
Then there was another series of laws that were passed that said anyone can register to vote. You don't need to prove your citizenship. You can use a gym membership card as an example.
So anyone can register to vote. There is no proof of ID when you get a ballot. There is no demonstration that the person who fills out the ballot has anything to do with the individual who's supposed to be voting that ballot, and it is legal for an individual to go out and collect hundreds or thousands of ballots, ship them in, and they will all qualify in these kind of mail-in ballot voting processes.
So there's nothing illegal or fraudulent going on. In fact, the system is operating exactly as intended.
It has been set up and structured in a way that with the right construct, you can get an individual appointed, not elected, but appointed to a particular role in government under a, quote, ‘free election’ in California.”
Watching long interview with Spencer Pratt. Interviewer's someone I've met personally. Bitter, rabid liberal. She was rude, stupid, ugly to those she disagreed with and now suddenly correct on politics because her house burned down. Won't link b/c she's a b. But still enlightening.
@karol I am loving all of this so much! We tried to recall Gavin, and got what some voted for, we tried to elect Rick Caruso, but got what the braindead left voted for. This feels like LA's last, best chance at becoming great again.
BREAKING NEWS: #PalisadesFire We just caught the State of California covering up more damning text messages about is knowledege of the dangerous condition of the Lachman burn scar! On the evening of Jan. 6th (the night before the Palisades Fire rekindled), State Park Supervisor Noa Rishe sent a text to her team of "environemntal scientists" warning them about the Red Flag weather conditions forcasted for the next day. This text shows the State had notice of the extreme fire danger yet they failed to inspect the Lachman burn scar for holdover smoldering embers which State Park employees had reported seeing in the Lachman burn scar only days earlier on Jan. 2nd.
In the second text, State Park "environmental scientist" John Ota reported seeing "the burn scar doing its best dust bowl impression". His text was sent on Jan. 7th at 6:48 a.m., less than 4 hours before the first 911 call reporting the start of the Palisades Fire. Its highly likely Ota was seeing the first evidence of the fire rekindling but did nothing to investigate further. He could have saved 7,000 homes from burning and saved 12 lives. And the State has covered up this evidence for the past 16 months!!
Neither of these texts were produced to the Plaintiffs before we deposed Rishe and Ota last December as required by the Court's order. We're going back to court to seek sanctions against the State for their serial violations of the Court's discovery order. #coverup @spencerpratt@AleneTchek@JeremyCom@SenRickScott@LeonardFiles