Death to Wage Labor, Death to Capital, Glory to Internationalism! 90% Maoist 10% leftcom. For the Cultural Revolution and the self abolition of the class form!
@Jb51014 He is as correct as he is incorrect, And he is indeed quite correct. The Materialist dialectic is a phenomena of Self-Motion unfolding within the absolute as it tends toward its opposite, but it is also itself a method that can acute its own position within the unfolding.
@libpol_org@TheRebeccaRowan You learned of motte and Bailey fallacy from social media, if anything the fallacy applies to you with “we just want normalcy” (the normalcy in question seeks to eventually normalize trumpism just as it has done with McCain and Bush).
@CentristMadness@gayest_tone You are the literal ideology that lost to Trump twice yet still believe that you’re correct. YOU are the ones who cannot admit that they are wrong, and you project your proud ignorance onto others just like MAGA
@EcoTechBro@DoctorMuuro 1917: Anarchist
1918/19: Dutch left
1921: ICT Damen
1925-28: Bordiga Italian left
1929-32: Trotskyist
1956-86: Hoxha/Maoist/ARML
1989: Avg Soviet boomer
1991: revisionist (at least everyone can agree on this one).
Truth Nuke: Never (because it’s always in our hearts)
@DoctorMuuro@Gross_Online@EcoTechBro I remember now! He critiqued the party form as not fully representing the working class, declared national liberation as bourgeois in the age of imperialism, and saw Marxism as non-invariant.
Chairman Mao perfectly describes the self abolition of the proletariat and the negation of the state form into its opposite, the commune form. (From “On Contradiction”)
@Gross_Online@EcoTechBro@DoctorMuuro Italian left guy, rejected the party form as non invariant and promoted the council form. Split from Bordiga in the 40s. Believed Rosa Luxembourg’s theory of self determination, went so far as calling self determination bourgeois more or less.