@Rongwrong_ Maybe calling it the "old" Alt-Right was imprecise language. By old I mean what came before the current Dissident Right, as things stood in ~2015.
The old Alt-Right, for all its warts, didn't have this fixation on religion. It was race first (as things should be). Religion was, at best, a peripheral concern. This new discourse-space is rife with a sort of Christian triumphalism that sees itself as the sole bulwark of White identity, and these people view any other form of spiritual expression as a threat. This zero-sum mindset of course, has the effect of subordinating race to religion, which in my view is a complete disaster, and has spawned a bastardized ethno-theology that I find intellectually repugnant.
Pagans and other non-Christians are often accused of being subversive or divisive. Yet, the genealogy of this movement is undeniable, and even a cursory glance at the timeline of events will show that this new wave of neo-Christian zealotry came AFTER the deplatforming of the Alt-Right, injected wholesale into the vacuum that was left. Is this not an indication that it is the subversive element here?
In the Alt-Right, you were not constantly bombarded by people trying to convert you. You were not shamed for not being sufficiently "Christpilled". Faith wasn't a constant point of contention. The focus was clearly on race, culture, immigration, the JQ, etc. While many thumb their noses at this earlier iteration of our movement, its priorities were correct. The recent hyper-focus on Christianity is a net negative; it is impotent reaction, it sows division, it attracts the wrong kind of person (brown), and, quite frankly, it makes us look foolish.
>make a post about how I miss the Alt-Right's relative lack of idiotic religious infighting
>idiot replies to accuse me of religious infighting, cites out of context Mein Kampf passages that arguably support my original position
The Christian faith is 2/3 black and brown. Yet, Christian racialists on this website spend all of their time and energy sperging and whining about a small contingent of White Pagans.
If you truly cared about our demographic future you'd spend half as much time attacking non-white Christians as you do 'pagan larpers'. Instead, you expend all of your effort perversely trying to police the spiritual beliefs of other Whites. This is a complete inversion of priorities. You would rather castigate people of your own race, who agree with you on 95% of what you believe, than deal with the literal hundreds of millions of non-whites who call themselves Christian. Many of which are flooding into your country as we speak.
It isn't the fucking 1400s. You are not fighting a war against Odin-worshiping Goths. You are losing a demographic war against people who LITERALLY WORSHIP THE SAME GOD YOU DO.
The Great Replacement has already come for your church. It is not coming, it is here. It happened decades ago. Your religion belongs to the 3rd World now, and its adherents will continue to pour into your countries while you wring your hands and navel gaze about better men than you who lived a thousand years ago.
If you don't get your priorities straight, you're going to be butchered by non-Whites holding crucifixes. And I will be laughing.
@DarthDude39971 Why would I point out passages in scripture if I'm not a Christian? Why must my worldview be legitimized by snippets from your fruity book
@CatholicJhadist "most of the movement doesn't care about religion"
"half of the movement is Christian!"
Pick a lane.
"You guys started it!!!"
Juvenile nonsense.
But, of course, you are missing the point. Care to address the billion (non-White) elephants in the room?