Ok, so let me get this straight Patty: you’ve been in that chair for 35 years, 9 presidential administrations (5 of them being Democrats), 24 of those 34 yrs the senate has been controlled by Democrats; and you’ve consistently run on “childcare costs”; WA has the highest childcare cost in the country; and you have delivered on a whopping 0 (at least that’s what the record and publicly available data shows) of your promises.
Beside solitaire and spreading misinformation online, what have you been doing in the Senate? It’s clearly not “fighting” for Washingtonians (unless they significantly pump up your bank account)?
Just asking, so we all know where your moral compass is pointing (or in your case, it just spins).
“MAGA meltdowns?” You may want to get news from several sources, the more the better. And most importantly, understand the expected level of bias in each specific source. And, look into international news (not just BBC America) and business news (again, spread your sources out and understand implied bias).
I think what you’ll learn will astound you. Unfortunately, most people are too lazy and it takes time to understand how to listen with specific biases in mind (and with context in mind).
@sahilkapur Hhmm, I think someone needs to take a basic QMeth class to get a fundamental understanding of interpreting and presenting statistics. Even gender studies undergrads look at this and say “uh, something’s wrong with this.”
lol. Okay. But here’s my question to, exactly what part of your (very weird) “attributes” are supposed to give you credibility? I mean really, pickup & SUVs are the super majority of vehicles sold.
And you “come from a military family”, cool. Please thank your dad. But what does that have to do with you? And why would you think that all service members are in a single party or mindset? If you and your family were PCS’d anywhere (at an age you could remember), you’d know this is absolutely untrue.
So let’s try this again. Support your argument with facts and the “why’s”. Not blanket statements like “yep, I can easily tow a 28,000 lbs 5th wheel because I have a pickup truck (when you have a Kei truck in your driveway).
Well that’s interesting.
But there’s no mention of the “Inflation Reduction Act” that you passed? The cost revisions were higher than the original climate score and it’s projected cost to 2030 is almost a trillion, with almost no goals met (according to a Wharton study - specifically pointing out poor and misleading arithmetic, the basic four functions of numbers).
Then you have Kamala blowing through $1.18 billion in her “frog in a blender” attempt to be president. Nothing built, only reputations destroyed and money wasted. You were saying something about vanity weren’t you?
And you think Democrats can actually reduce cost of living? You can’t even do third grade math correctly and/or honestly. Remember, this isn’t political rhetoric, this is a study from the world’s most respected B School based on actual performance compared to political hype.
Ok, so you’ve proven you’re great at finding things to complain about, and shifting blame where it serves you.
Now, can you propose a solution? One that isn’t political rhetoric but sound economic policy?
I’m really wondering how you made it in business without a solutions based approach.
“Most Americans”?
Your own constituents can’t even contact you, unless it involves a paid appearance.
Did you know, a party agnostic (as much as it could be) analysis of your effectiveness as a senator and senate leader, shows your strongest effectiveness is your absolute allegiance to your party? Not the country or the American people. In terms of effectiveness for the country and as a leader, you have been mediocre at best over your 35 yr tenure.
How can you honestly say you speak for the “American people ?”
You pose an interesting question, on the surface. But what is the intent of your question, to divide, to imply something or mislead with a “seemingly” authentic question?
Here’s my point. A musket causes significantly more damage than an AR. Not to mention an AR cannot fire 600 rounds per minute without a difficult to get “license” and a modification. A military rifle can, but civilians don’t have access and soldier access is controlled. And lastly, the mortality rate in the rifles and muskets back then was 80% even with medical care, Today it’s more like 8%.
So what should a change in laws be based on? Facts? Or uninformed political hot topics (which is too often more the norm than the exception).
All that said, you are achieving the goal of your post! 😉
Please don’t point at people and tell us we’re all stupid.
Have you actually run the math on the Affordable Care Act? It is one of the costly acts Congress has ever forced on the American people and the U.S. government.
Please save your bullshit for the gullible voter who keep you in office.
All you pedo believers, where is the evidence showing any evidence of that?
If he can be prosecuted and convicted of an alleged bookkeeping error (the actual and only charges and all 34 convictions, the error being NY’s determination of what they invoices should be classified as - not accounting professional), don’t you think he’d at least be brought up on some type of charge for a serious crime IF there was a shred of evidence?
Or do you blindly follow whatever you’re told?
@GovBobFerguson Did you know:
The Hornet behind you has nothing to do with WA? Wasn’t designed or engineered here, has never been built here, upgrades aren’t done here, the Boeing HQ even fled WA.
Is this your idea of success?
You don’t need a council to tell you the infrastructure sucks, the taxes are out of control, companies large and small are fleeing, and the cost of living in WA is too high for ANY perceived benefit received (caused by the state and counties, not federal policies).
But it’s a nice-sounding way to create more reasons to raise taxes.
“The man in charge…”? You obviously have no idea how the system works.
And maybe try your spin again since everything you stated is factually false, misleading in the employment (actually just wrong), erroneous in charges and adjudication,
Where in the world do you get this crap?
@WalshFreedom@grok Given it is nearly impossible to be hired as a federal law enforcement officer with these types of convictions, is this post accurate or a total political farce?