I think poker is one of the clearest real-world laboratories for studying behavioral finance and decision-making under uncertainty. The same biases show up in investing, business, negotiations, and everyday life.
@JonathanLittle Why all the hate in this thread? Sure, 20 hours is a tiny sample, but making a healthy income at 1/3 is absolutely possible in the right games.
For what it’s worth, I averaged >$70/hour playing 1/3 and 1/2 over a 700-hour sample over the last three years.
@clintmartian@WSOP The results sucked. Results aside, I suppose this is one of the only things that makes Big O an “okay” game: folks overvalue their naked nut-low draw way way too often.
One of the biggest lessons poker has taught me is that how you handle your losses is just as important as how you handle your wins. You can’t control every outcome, but you can control your attitude.
So why not take it on the chin, keep moving forward, and carry on with a smile?
@JonathanLittle Depends on rake structure and effective stack depth. I find that deep-stacked cash regs at 2/5 and 5/10 massively over do it on 3-bets, 4-bets, and 5-bets. Many also clearly don’t understand the concept of chip EV in time-raked games.
@iqrafatma1278 I think I’d prefer the Japanese culture—no tipping.
When I was younger, I was taught 15% was a standard tip. Then it turned into 18% and now I’m seeing 20% and even 25%. Food prices have also increased a ton. Are they trying to make the same hourly as CPAs and JDs?
@Amo4sho The tax portion is very misunderstood.
A cash player earning a steady $150k/yr for 20 years and a tourney player with the same lifetime EV do not end up in the same place after taxes.
Tourney players likely pay more lifetime taxes because of the high variability of wins/losses.
@Amo4sho Tournament players often confuse “more mistakes” with “more profit.”
WSOP fields are incredibly soft, but variance, top-heavy payouts, fees, taxes, and shallow-stack play all matter. Measured as EV relative to bankroll required for a low RoR, cash>tournaments.
@AdamHendrix10 In other words, optimize for the highest risk-adjusted win rate within a reasonable risk-of-ruin for your bankroll. Risk-Adjusted Win Rate = Win Rate ÷ Standard Deviation