If we fail to recognize his impact , his good intentions in the fight for freedom and justice for all who are trapped in that miserable contraption , Then we are all most foolish and selfish people.
#FreeMaziNnamdiKanu
" IPOB DOES NOT BELONG TO ME , IT DOESN'T BELONGS TO MY FAMILY ,IT BELONGS TO ALL OF US "
-MNK-
Anybody who still argue about the importance of IPOB STRUCTURE will be blocked. THE DOS IS HIGHEST AUTHORITY IN IPOB.
Click here👇
https://t.co/TARf6Sn2Kv
SOLUTIONS; FREE BIAFRA @AU
Ụnụ asala chị ụmụ Chikwu Okike Abiama, mma mma nụ
Onye bọrọ chị kene chị ya maka na ndụ bụ isi
Ya bụ ka ahịa ǹkwọ kwọtara anyị nile ìhè ọma n'ụbọchị taata, eje ana bụ ịsị ije, Ise Isee Iseeeee
#FreeMaziNnamdiKanu.
BIAFRA:
The Coastal Renaissance
Friday 12 June (Nkwor) Edition.
The 24 Hour Republic
Featuring the regulars:
Na wetin dey happen •
Tweet of the week • Announcements
Join us for this educational exposition!
@real_IpobDOS@radiobiafralive
The Biafran Question Can Only Be Resolved Through Dialogue, Not Arrests, Prosecution – Aloy Ejimakor
By @SaharaReporters
Prominent lawyer and special counsel to imprisoned Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Nnamdi Kanu, Barrister Aloy Ejimakor, has argued that the long-running Biafra agitation can only be effectively addressed through dialogue rather than arrests, prosecutions, or other law enforcement measures.
Speaking during an exclusive interview with Rudolf Okonkwo on 90MinutesAfrica, Ejimakor described the agitation for Biafra as a political issue rooted in demands for self-determination, insisting that the Nigerian government should engage aggrieved groups through negotiations.
According to him, those seeking self-determination are essentially asking for a seat at the negotiating table rather than seeking confrontation with the state.
"When people engage in agitations for self-determination, they are actually asking to come to the table," he said. "The best answer to such agitations is not the use of law enforcement but dialogue."
Ejimakor maintained that the continued agitation in the South-East demonstrates that security measures alone have failed to resolve the matter. He argued that the Nigerian government should invite proponents of self-determination to discuss their grievances and aspirations, noting that such discussions are common in democratic societies.
He cited Article 20 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, which recognizes the right of peoples to self-determination. While acknowledging the authority of the Nigerian state to reject demands for secession, he stressed that any such decision should emerge from constructive engagement rather than coercive measures.
"The state may refuse self-determination, but it must do so across the table through dialogue and negotiation," he stated.
Ejimakor also expressed concern over what he described as growing frustration among people in the South-East. He warned against actions that could further alienate the region, saying there appears to be attempts to provoke widespread resentment in the South-East.
He noted that despite dissatisfaction with the current political situation, many people in the South-East continue to participate in Nigeria's democratic process because they still consider themselves part of the country.
According to him, one of the major sources of discontent remains the continued detention of Nnamdi Kanu. He argued that regardless of political affiliations, many residents of the region are unhappy with the situation and view it as a symbol of unresolved grievances.
Also, addressing speculation that some South-East political leaders may be hindering efforts to secure Kanu's freedom, Ejimakor rejected the claim and insisted that ultimate responsibility rests with President Bola Tinubu.
He described Kanu's case as a federal matter and argued that the President possesses the constitutional and political authority to make a decisive intervention if he chooses to do so.
"The buck stops at the President's table," Ejimakor said. "Any narrative suggesting that South-East governors are responsible for Kanu's continued detention is merely an attempt to shift responsibility away from the Presidency."
He further contended that blaming regional political leaders risks dividing the Igbo people and diverting attention from the federal government's role in resolving the issue.
The lawyer concluded by reiterating that dialogue remains the most effective path toward lasting peace and national unity. He urged the federal government to engage in sincere negotiations over the grievances driving the Biafra agitation and to address the controversy surrounding Kanu's conviction and life imprisonment.
Obi Aguocha Urges Ikwuano/Umuahia Traditional Rulers to Intervene Against Nnamdi Kanu’s Death Sentence
Distinguished Hon. Obi Aguocha, Member representing Ikwuano/Umuahia Federal Constituency in the House of Representatives, has called on traditional rulers in Ikwuano and Umuahia to urgently intervene by appealing to the Federal Government to drop its cross-appeal seeking the death sentence for Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.
Aguocha made the appeal during a meeting with the royal fathers, urging them to use their revered position to press the Federal Government to abandon the move, which he described as a threat to peace and justice in the South East.
He emphasised that the intervention of traditional institutions is critical at this time to protect the life of the IPOB leader and prevent further escalation of tension in the region.
ABURI: When you speak the truth, you don't stutter (stammer) so much.
General Yakubu Gowon owes this generation of Nigeria's indigenous peoples a lot of apologies. He should just admit he was a puppet who simply did what he was commanded to do - to help them turn Nigeria into the unrecognisable mess that it has become today.
Wonder how he feels now.
History is very important
Godwin Kelechi wrote -
‘Ojukwu Misrepresented Aburi to His People’" - Yakubu Gowon. Where is your copy sir?
Gowon argued that Ojukwu’s interpretation of the Aburi resolutions reflected a personal political agenda rather than the collective position reached at the meeting. According to him, the records of the meeting did not support Ojukwu’s claims.
“What Ojukwu said, therefore, merely conformed to his own personal agenda, not the agreed position at Aburi and not what the generality of Nigerians wanted,” Gowon stated.
“More worrisome, however, was that he consciously preached a divisive philosophy, knowing fully well that the meeting at Aburi was all about our collective resolve to commit to an indivisible Nigeria. Worse, he sold the illusion of ‘independence’ to traumatised people who were already tired of blo*odshed and needed some form of healing and closure,” Gowon added.
But Gowon’s position remains difficult to defend for one major reason: throughout the civil w*ar and even up till this moment, he has never publicly produced a full transcript of what transpired at Aburi.
On his return from Aburi, Ojukwu released the complete transcript of the meeting, and the slogan “On Aburi We Stand” quickly became the rallying cry across the Eastern Region. If Gowon was truly convinced that Ojukwu distorted the agreement, why did the Federal Government never publicly release its own official transcript to counter those claims?
The reality is that after returning from Aburi, Gowon consulted his top advisers, many of whom feared that implementing the accord would drastically weaken the powers of the central government. The Aburi Accord proposed a highly decentralised system, which would have given the regions far greater control over their affairs, resources, and security.
For the traumatised people of the Eastern Region, this arrangement was seen as a safeguard against a repeat of the mas**sacres and political persecution they had experienced in different parts of the country.
Ojukwu did not merely “sell the illusion of independence” to his people. Rather, it was the failure to fully implement the Aburi Accord, alongside the continued k**ngs and insecurity faced by Easterners across Nigeria, that pushed many toward the idea of secession.
To people in the East, Biafra was not about ambition or conquest. It was a desperate cry for survival.
#postviralシ #facts #nigeria #politics #history #IgboAmaka #civilwar
@real_IpobDOS@radiobiafralive
The Aburi Accord was not an ordinary political meeting. It was a final opportunity for Nigeria to avert collapsing into war and sowing a permanent seed of disunity. But it failed.
https://t.co/mNrJaaHzrL
@real_IpobDOS@radiobiafralive
In all your wickedness , your arrogance, you deception, your evil-mindset or feeling like god , never you abuse or take the volunteers for granted . People who freely give their time, energy, and resources to support a cause are the backbone of any successful movement. Taking that dedication for granted or mistreating volunteers is a surefire way to lose the very people who care the most.
Understand that they have their own lives, jobs, and limits. Never pressure them because of your own missteps , lies , deceitful nature and fraudulent ways that will make them feel guilty of why they volunteered or make them for stepping back from their participation.
Keep volunteers of any movement in the loop. Make sure they know exactly what the goals are and how their specific efforts make a difference, no lies , no manipulation, no deception, no disrespect and above all don’t blackmail when you’re confronted with truth and facts where you have derailed . Create a safe space for them to share ideas or voice concerns without fear of dismissal.
When people feel respected and appreciated, their passion multiplies. When they feel used , abused , blackmailed, harassed or threatened with death , they will quickly walk away or turn around to show they were never fools or not to be taken for granted .
@real_IpobDOS@radiobiafralive
In his book, Gowon cast Ojukwu as the bad guy on #Biafra & Aburi.
In this video, Ojukwu replied Gowon word for word, as if he knew what was to come.
Jailing an innocent man like Simon Ekpa Alexander Stup and expecting Biafrans to stay calm doesn’t make the world better. A President’s duty is to conduct a thorough investigation before labeling anyone a terrorist. We demand justice and due process! ⚖️ #Justice#Biafra#USB
IPOB Declares Authority to Deploy ESN Operatives Across Biafraland Without Local Permission
IPOB has issued a bold press statement declaring its authority to deploy ESN operatives across Biafraland without permission from governors, traditional rulers, or politicians.
In the April 30, 2026 statement signed by Mazi Chikadibia Edoziem, Head of the Directorate of State, IPOB says it will decisively tackle threats from Fulani herdsmen, Islamic jihadists, and terror groups, citing the failure of the Nigerian government and local Biafran leaders to protect the people.
IPOB warns collaborators working with the Nigerian state to grant terrorists access, stating it has strong intelligence on them.
https://t.co/m2KnNqmTsd