I have now claimed 75 entirely separate #1 Ranks in the World just for Gears 5 TDM alone.
#1 Rank in the World for Gears of War 5/Gears 5, collected on June 2nd, 2026. This is my 164th overall competitive gaming #1 rank.
Downright incredible villain, just as the legends claim. Here's the thing: In Spiderman 1 (PS5) there is an equally brilliant portrayal of Dr. Octopus, which is one of the reasons that game gets listed as one of the best video games of all time.
GameStop has announced they are ending the use of their "hard to remove" price stickers for their games
They are shifting to new "state of the art", easy-peel stickers
Dana White reveals that after he got blackout drunk, he thought he had only lost $80,000 gambling, but he had actually lost $3,000,000
"I was drinking having a blast and ended up losing like 80 grand."
"I'm at work the next day and the host from the casino calls me and says, hey Dana do you still need the room at the hotel? I said, no I don't need the room, but don't get to comfortable with my 80 grand, I'm coming back for it."
"Dead silence on the other end of the phone..."
"He's like, Dana... you lost $3 million last night.."
"I said, What the fuck are you talking about? I only have a $1.5 million credit line. He says, yeah you made us call the GM of the hotel and started calling him a f*cking p*ssy."
Andrew Gallimore: "Some people are getting banned from the DMT realm"
"Mantis beings are even punching people in the face"
He told AJ from The Why Files how one person described a mantis being punching a user in the face right as they entered the space. The punch was felt and the entire experience ended instantly. The user snapped back to baseline consciousness with the effects just gone like that.
People report getting a big X in their field of vision that says no entry. Or an entity that wags its finger and says no no no. Or a clear message that you are not welcome here and we are not letting you in.
This is called a lockout. It can last for months or years. Unlike normal tolerance that builds gradually this functions like an on off switch with no straightforward pharmacological explanation.
These consistent accounts from regular DMT users continue to raise deep questions about what is actually encountered in that space.
This is Mark Zuckerberg's ranking system, who is the 7th richest person in the World. Why is it so difficult to simply rank ALL UFC fighters? ...Instead of just the Top 15 in each division. To me that makes no sense.
Last night, millions of Brazilians received an alert through their national emergency broadcast system declaring an alien invasion had begun. Authorities later claimed that their emergency broadcast system was hacked.
The incident follows a prediction by a highly popular Brazilian psychic with 23 million followers on Instagram who predicted UFOs are going to appear and abduct hundreds of people at the upcoming June 24 World Cup match in Miami featuring Brazil.
Are Brazilians being prepared for the start of Operation Blue Beam?
‘Humans, we have arrived!’ Brazilians receive alien invasion alerts https://t.co/aZrUDLPaRc
Why do we need a UAP Scientific Advisory Board?
As has been widely reported, the US government has asked Professor Avi Loeb, of the Department of Astronomy at Harvard University (see the main announcement at the end of this posting), to create a UAP Advisory Council. The members of this advisory group span a range of disciplines from astronomy, psychology, physics, biology, data analytics, psychology, entrepreneurs, and more. I am thrilled to have been invited alongside a notable list of scientists, academics, entrepreneurs, and others.
What follows are my personal thoughts and are not any official position of the UAP Advisory Council. Dr. Loeb has already elaborated on the formation of this Council, along with his views through postings on his blog and in public interviews.
Importantly, no one on the Council has been asked to sign any non-disclosure agreements. We are told that we are free to discuss matters that come before the Board, but without attribution of the source (Chatham House rules). By the same token, I am not obligated to answer any questions either. I plan to treat this effort like I do my day job in cancer immunology—not talking publicly about results until I am sure the answer is as close to correct as I can determine.
So, how did this Advisory Council come to be? Well, one answer is simple—through the dedicated action of thousands of individuals across decades, the coming forward of credible military and government officials in public testimony (sometimes under oath), the work of members of Congress and the Senate, along with testimonials of public witnesses, and much more.
Collectively, those actions have led to the extraordinary and courageous decision by President Donald J. Trump and his administration to release to the public US government-owned UAP-related files and information as vetted by a UAP Governance Board and other government agencies. As publicly announced, our group will report to the UAP Governing Board, which is under the direction of the Executive Branch.
Many people have openly wondered, “Why create a new Board when elements of the government or even commercial institutions already (allegedly) know the answer?” The UAP Advisory Council doesn't have any funding, and we don’t have subpoena power. We are all volunteers. We advise. Given that, there are some straightforward answers to the criticisms and commentary I have seen.
First, appreciate that the complexity of what UAP might represent is not definable in a single technological or cultural framework. It is so complex that even I, who have been steeped in the matter for over 15 years, have a hard time encompassing the breadth of explanations from “it’s real, and it’s here” to “it’s all misidentification”. My mind spins trying to make sense of it all.
What is clear is that the data released so far is not enough. The anecdotes are not enough. Sure, interesting videos, but where’s the metadata? What are the parameters of how the data was collected? Why are there extreme redactions of files and data? Why the incredible pushback? Where are the alleged retrieved technologies? There’s simply not enough to convince me when I put on my serious scientist’s hat.
Yet what I do know is that the question of what it might be will not go away while the data remains locked up. The answers to what any data might mean will require a comprehensive effort across disciplines that expand well beyond “nuts and bolts” science. Hence, the broad makeup of the team that comprises the UAP Advisory Council. Every person on the Board is, I believe, devoted to taking a logical and deeply skeptical approach to this matter. We will let the data guide us and cross-check each other.
For me, despite my widely known bias that I think there’s something deeper to the matter than misidentification, I remain like any scientist a trained sceptic at heart. I am terrified of making a mistake, but I’ve yet to reach a formal conclusion despite my public musings. I can believe a thing might be true, but as a scientist, I must believe enough in the possibility of an idea being true to justify my time and effort to prove it to myself— and more so to prove it to colleagues or the lay public.
There is data that, when contextualized as a hypothesis, becomes evidence that invites us to wonder whether the answer to “Are We Alone?” might be sitting right in front of us, but we choose to ignore it or let others tell us it should be ignored. Remember, data is only evidence towards supporting a conclusion when you pose a question (hypothesis) around what the data means. But evidence is not a conclusion. Evidence is what you put in front of a jury, where the data has been sufficiently scrubbed of doubt to allow one to decide what it means.
So, back to “Why do we need a UAP Scientific Advisory Board?” Well, we all want objective, and even subjective, expertise to interpret whatever data comes our way. Even if tomorrow a saucer landed in Times Square, we would still need a swath of expertise to interpret what opens the door, how it got here, and what might be the intent. Better to be prepared, in my opinion.
We obviously risk that this is a misdirection from some essential truth or that we might be being used in some elaborate disinformation campaign. We are also aware that we might be in for the possibility that there is simply nothing there but elaborate stories and misidentifications.
But I can tell you this—the risk is worth it. We have come further than ever before to open the door (or Pandora’s Box) to a potentially incredible opportunity. “Are we alone?” might be answered as “We are one of many.” Coming to know what others might have already learned about the nature of reality is, for me, well worth the effort to ask the question.
One way or the other, I believe humanity can handle the answer.
https://t.co/QZEUu6AZAa
New: Joe Rogan just sat down with UFC champion Justin Gaethje who dropped the cold truth that Ilia Topuria may never become champion again:
ROGAN: “Ilia still might go down as the greatest fighter of all time. He’s only 29 years old.”
GAETHJE: “The odds of that happening are so low now.”
ROGAN: “Because he lost to you?”
GAETHJE: “He has the skills to do it, but I broke his identity. I did the same thing to Tony Ferguson.
When you show the world how to beat fighters that look unbeatable it changes how future opponents will perceive them. His opponents will have confidence now because they know he’s beatable.”
ROGAN: “That’s interesting. That was what happened to Mike Tyson in his prime and also guys like Anderson Silva and Ronda Rousey.”
GAETHJE: “It’s going to be such a tough task now that he has to fight people that aren’t scared of him.”
ROGAN: “The reports are saying that he has two fractured orbitals and a broken nose.”
Now it's my fault that a random Scottish man apparently attacked some Muslims?
He literally said in the clip why he was angry, and allegedly he attacked 5 people?
And his reasoning was about abhorrent crimes committed by your community, nothing to do with me or Rupert.
So in the last three months,
According to my analytics, I’ve netted well over 100,000 new followers for a grand total of - 9,000.
@RealJamesWoods is right - there’s something fishy going on that won’t allow us conservatives to grow.
Every single conservative I know, no matter how many followers they gain monthly, on their analytics, their follower count remains the same.
It never ends for us.