First of all. They are not law enforcement.
Second, when you are paying for information (rat) you usually go with the lower level people to art on the leadership. You don't pay the planners to rat on themselves and tell you in advance what THEY are planning to do.
Third, if this was all perfectly legitimate, why did they pay for them out of secret accounts (none of this confidentiality bullshit) and then stop the practice as soon as they got wind they were being investigated for it? Under the Biden Administration
@PeterDiamandis When I was recruiting employees on campuses, the question always came up about their education.
I was honest with them. I told them that their degree did not matter much in doing the job, I was just not allowed to hire anyone without a degree.
@RapidResponse47@StephenMoore The key word is "skilled" and our schools and colleges are doing nothing to help.
Degrees in theater, gender studies and political science are not helping anyone.
@matthewstoller But you were ok when the unsubstantiated claims were against Trump and Kavanaugh.
Got it.
Believe all women unless those women are accusing one of your own useful idiots like Biden and Platner.
It is the double standard that is the biggest issue.
These disgusting Democrats went through hoops to call Peteโs Christian tattoo a nazi symbol and support their outrage.
Now they are twisting themselves into a pretzel to defend an actual Nazi tattoo on one of their own and how he is a great guy.
Says all you need to know about Democrats
I am inclined to say let the Democrats have their Nazi in Maine. Collins votes the same way and you can use him for six years as a poster child for their Party. You are not losing a vote. If she wins, he just fades away and everyone forgets how hard the Democrats pushed for a Nazi to be elected.
I am inclined to say let the Democrats have their Nazi in Maine. Collins votes the same way and you can use him for six years as a poster child for their Party. You are not losing a vote.
If she wins, he just fades away and everyone forgets how hard the Democrats pushed for a Nazi to be elected.
@GovSherrillNJ Yes. Allow them to break the law and then make taxpayers fund their lengthy, baseless litigation.
THIS is the DEMOCRAT Party.
And they are using your tax dollars to do it.
@the_jefferymead Why do you think the Democrats always compare Trumps' performance to Obama and not Biden?
Biden sucked and they know it.
Obama sucked but he had that charisma to lie to your face with a smile. Like Gavin Newsom
@ScottPresler I am almost inclined to say let the Democrats have their Nazi in Maine. Collins votes the same way and you can use him for six years as a poster child for the Party. If she wins, he just fades away and everyone forgets how hard the Democrats pushed for a Nazi to be elected.
I have been disputing this for a while.
It was one of my daily debates with Woke GROK.
When asked about hate crimes, they point to the Democrat talking points and the ADL and SPLC "independent" reports as support. Data GROK says is extracted from official crime reports.
After pushing back extensively, WOKE GROK finally admitted that there is no source from the government as the government does not track crimes this way. Therefore, they take the government data, and THEY determine which category to put it in. But WOKE GROK does not consider this subjective because they use reliable sources as support. When I challenged GROK that this is very subjective and not transparent, GROK pushes back and says their "methodology" is publicly available. But when I asked what sources they use to make this assessment, GROK points to "reliable" media such as the NYT, WaPo, Reuters, AP, CNN, MSNBC, etc... You know, "reliable sources".
So, I asked Grok that if their report is so "reliable" why don't they share the data with the public so we can see how THEY categorized specific crimes. GROK defends them as it is proprietary. Great transparency. Trust us, we wouldn't be bias.
So, I asked GROK, if these reports are so reputable and are relied upon, then for transparency you would think it would be important to show the underlying data so you could assess that they were not being bias. GROK agrees but then reverts back to defending them as being "independent" of political bias and have many years of experience doing this.
But without ever showing anyone where they put the crimes.