Just so Hulk understand, solution to non-politically appointed judges deciding cases is to have decision reviewed (for now) but non-politically appointed acting director?
THAT LAWYER WOULD ARGUE A CLIENT CAUGHT WILLFULLY INFRINGING SHOULD PAY $0 IN FACE OF STATUTE MANDATING NO LESS THAN REASONABLE ROYALTY AFTER ADMITTING TO OWING $ TESTS LIMITS OF “ZEALOUS ADVOCACY” AS MUCH AS HULK TESTS LIMITS OF PROPER GRAMMAR
THIS JUST MAKE HULK SO ANGRY! BUT NOT FAIR FOR HULK TO PUMMEL STUPID, PUNY HUMAN. MAYBE ONE OF HULK’S FRIENDS TAKE KINDER APPROACH? @JNGross@AdamMossoff
https://t.co/QoKwJl5G5w