Jason

Bored n browsing

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@NJBeisner @Toolatetoadult Imagine being as dishonest and desperate you are. Presenting Candace talking about a text she claims states, "they are going to kill me", as if she has said, "the left is going to kill me".

I'll wait and see. Until then, you should be less dishonest.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@NJBeisner @LordCody1293 So, you don't know either.

Hope that helps, thanks.

The claim Candace was making was about text messages stating specifically, "they are going to kill me", not "the left is going to kill me". We'll have to wait to see it.

Until then, you're misrepresenting this clip.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@KingOffX_ She has orchestrated and organized numerous hit pieces against Candace. 🤣 Candace defended Erika at the outset.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@eMTBrides "I don't have a horse in the race". BS. 🤣 She dismantled him, and demonstrated that his claims also rest on hearsay. He backtracked like a little B**ch on his claim that there was overwhelming evidence.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@JinxedRealityX Yes, it was good for ad revenue for both of them.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@ObscureMod @paleochristcon @RealCandaceO The topic of the debate was, "There is overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk". Andrew provided nothing to support that other than hearsay.

And being fair, some of Candace's claims also rely on hearsay and inference.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@RavenGrace0613 His face looks normal. 🤣 It's to be expected that two people who work closely together get frustrated with each other, and she has openly admitted to arguments between them.

Thanks for the nothing burger.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@___A_a_r_o_n__ Andrew relied on hearsay as evidence. 🤣 His "overwhelming" evidence was hearsay and inference. To be fair, he's doing exactly what Candace does.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@Rach4Patriarchy Yeah, Andrew relied on hearsay to back up his claims. At best, we can say he is doing what Candace is doing, but he's less critical.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@NJBeisner You're projecting, and that's exactly what Andrew's argument was. All of the "overwhelming" evidence he cited was hearsay. 🤣

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@paleochristcon Release the clips Andrew. Unedited, of course. 🤣 What a hack.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@paleochristcon You are saying for certain that Candace Owens certainly did not say. 🤣

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@ChrisisWrightt @PBDsPodcast Trump and Bibi are dividing the right.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@PBDsPodcast It's a copout of an answer, but we understand you don't want to alienate your viewers.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@bjones306 @JodyChaseTN Andrew provided zero evidence of anything. His claims were proved to be based on hearsay. He didn't even know the charges, and he was caught lying numerous times. 🤣

I guess we watched different debates, or you just have a sub-80 IQ.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@ehazzard @JodyChaseTN Awww, you can't win on substance, eh?

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@WBMorris191 @JodyChaseTN 4. She completely dismantled Andrew's claim (the topic of the debate) that there is overwhelming evidence that Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. She proves that @paleochristcon arguments are based on hearsay and inference (as are hers, to be fair).

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@WBMorris191 @JodyChaseTN 1. She provided plenty of evidence that Tyler Robinson is a patsy. You must not have watched the debate, or you lack basic comprehension skills.
2. Unverified texts we still don't know are real.
3. She did highlight the oversight and corrected based on it.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@Leroywhite79913 @Iam_davidjames @Iwendtster So you didn't watch the debate and never watch her show, eh?

She dismantled the evidence Andrew relied on for his claim, demonstrating the evidence to hear hearsay, and not "overwhelming". That was Andrew's claim, and he lost based on that claim.

Try to keep up.

[Jason @ISmiteWithLight]

@ten_bens10 @Iam_davidjames @Iwendtster Candace summarily dismantled the "evidence" that @paleochristcon relied on, demonstrating that it is hearsay. On the topic of the debate, she won hands down. The topic of the debate was that there is overwhelming evidence indicating Tyler Robinson shot Charlie Kirk. He lost.