Promoted within digital ledger technology (DLT) communities:
Institutions want to adopt DeFi
Others lack appropriate offerings
Which Radix uniquely solves
A self-reinforcing cycle to sustain hype
encourage speculative participation, not anchored in institutional needs.
TradFi won’t adopt DeFi because it’s trendy.
They’ll adopt it because they have to.
The efficiencies are real. The tooling is maturing. And the demand for programmable assets is only growing.
But they’ll only move when the infrastructure is ready.
🧵👇
It’s hard to find the words with news such as this.
@fuserleer wasn’t just the founder of Radix. He was its core.
His conviction, clarity, and refusal to accept “good enough” inspired me and many others.
Dan and I shared countless deep conversations over the years.
About DeFi, sure. But also about human things. Being dads, cars, music, and much more.
He had an unwavering belief that systems, if built properly, could unlock a fairer future. He was brilliant, stubborn, kind, and unapologetically himself.
The Radix we’re building today exists because Dan refused to follow the crowd. He stepped back, rethought the whole thing from first principles, and built something no one else dared to.
Losing him is devastating. But what he built is real, it’s working, and it will endure.
We’ll honour Dan by building with the same rigour, humility, and ambition that defined him.
@Adam_XRD Coming back to the BoE
They specifically do not want to encourage the dangerous speculative activity that goes with increased volume on a public DLT if used in settlements
Antithetical to public DLTs
And Radix in this context:-
A million miles from addressing these issues
@Adam_XRD Thank you for your reply
To be succinct
All DLTs’ core primitives necessarily entail compositionally<— high level hard work
Public DLTs have these problems
Systemic epistemic failure—>concepts of trust, value, use undermined by ideological beliefs (aka scam)<— need reality dose
@Adam_XRD Here is the way forward:
Categorical Dynamics in DLT
Ledgers switch from user IDs to abstract math. Objects, morphisms, and protocols—not people—drive system change. More flexible, easier to connect, not about the person.
https://t.co/doUetTIOTi
Here is the way forward:
Categorical Dynamics in DLT
Ledgers switch from user IDs to abstract math. Objects, morphisms, and protocols—not people—drive system change. More flexible, easier to connect, not about the person.
Token Distribution Dynamics
Wider token spread, safer ledger.
Too centralised = risk.
Design for balance: clear governance, clear rules, real utility, not just hype.
Find real utility benefits as building and adoption progress
Not utility/asset token paranoia
For The Financial DLT Utility Balance
DLT to cut $20B clearing costs, open $16T assets. Intermediaries essential for user trust.
Speculation risk tamed by design.
Here is the way forward:
Categorical Dynamics in DLT
Ledgers switch from user IDs to abstract math. Objects, morphisms, and protocols—not people—drive system change. More flexible, easier to connect, not about the person.
TradFi won’t adopt DeFi because it’s trendy.
They’ll adopt it because they have to.
The efficiencies are real. The tooling is maturing. And the demand for programmable assets is only growing.
But they’ll only move when the infrastructure is ready.
🧵👇
Mechanism-Driven Social Impact Solutions
DLT = transparency, public trust. Use categoric setups for welfare, infra, ESG, anti-fraud, and better aid spend. Institutions more accountable.
Category Theory for Anti-Abuse Mechanisms
Abuse = relation shift, not ID problem. Patterns mapped with morphisms. Granular crypto keys enable audit and privacy. Voting agents, not pure chaos.
Major use case complex:-
Social Applications and Abuse Prevention
DLT to stop abusers, not just money games. AI filters, math abstracts content, patterns get flagged privacy safe. Prevent abuse; obey laws.