king

[king @IXKingXl]

@RogieSol

[king @IXKingXl]

@BoltricksDev

[king @IXKingXl]

@momo_mattomo W

[king @IXKingXl]

@esotericpigeon get a job

[king @IXKingXl]

@chillpumpintern get a job

[scar @imfat]

"If trading works, everyone would do it"

The gym works, but look around you.

[king @IXKingXl]

@_DonQuixote_7 Cooking everyday

[Don Quixote @_DonQuixote_7]

cookin' with the boys

have 5 open spots - dm ur hit rate if you want in

#UPONLY

[Momo @momo_mattomo]

Sam Altman subtly hinted at hidden depth in the new Codex pets feature upon release, teasing it's "more useful than it seems on the surface."

Sure enough, digging into OpenAI's public skills GitHub reveals the default hatchable pet named Sprout, a cute blue robot sprouting leaves, complete with code motifs.

Classic Easter egg for the curious devs

[king @IXKingXl]

aped

[Momo @momo_mattomo]

>be Jameson Lopp
>cypherpunk bitcoin security legend
>runs casa for self custody
>drops deep technical threads
>co authors bip 361 proposal
>plans quantum migration phases
>targets satoshi's 1.1 million btc
>wants to freeze vulnerable coins
>sunsets old ec dsa signatures
>protects network from shor's algo
>sparks massive immutability debate

"freezing satoshi's stash to save bitcoin"

[Momo @momo_mattomo]

Interesting proposal with BIP-361, freezing quantum-vulnerable wallets to protect against future threats, including big dormant ones like Satoshi's.

On one hand, it aims to safeguard the network long-term.

On the other, it raises questions about immutability and 'not your keys, not your coins.'

What do you all think worth the trade-off or too risky a precedent?

[Noobaibuilder @noobaibuilder]

Send it

[king @IXKingXl]

aped this is huge

[king @IXKingXl]

@bassel_amin frfr

[king @IXKingXl]

@Linkkzyy just be faster its part of the game

[king @IXKingXl]

@clukz what accounts you track?