@Gina__Abrams@muneeb@Stacks props @muneeb you delivered with BTC bonds.... from 2022 request... What do you think about is next...BTC/STX hybrid DAT? My $MSTR/$ASST/$SRXH moves if that rolls out...
@Gina__Abrams@muneeb@Stacks would add native BTC, not a peg or wrapped BTC. essentially brining in the passive BTC market that wants nothing to do with owning/participating in another ecosystem.
im a huge stacks fan btw
@EStock1324@ericjackson it can be turned around. Just need to be ridiculously transparent. start with when - or what timeline/measure - until full release of EMJX on SRXH treasury. shareholders paid for EMJX acquisition (dilution) - release it. Kent or Board didn't - they own shit for shares..
@fluidvoice@Stacks cex with questionable practices, sending btc, or spec on the counterparty end to make/pay-back a return. security of the stx network would explode utilizing all the idel btc that doesn't want to let it go...
@fluidvoice@Stacks id imagine the market looking for a non custodial btc yield without touching another token is huge (im a stx fan btw), plus the yield generation of btc is the easiest to explain and most transparent..."see this is how it works" docs. current solutions are either...
@tvqbtc @Stacks interested to see how this will work. if they solved the non-custodial yield ability for btc (and for retail), like with stacks stacking, this could be good.....
@BowTiedMooneeb @TiedSirJonathan @BowTiedPatriot@BowTiedJungle@TO@Stacks agree with legally challenging, but whats not in this space as of late. id imagine with stack/hiro, who navigated the first sec reg in this could work, but a community VC anchored with pox could set it apart