Adam

මෙතන තියෙන්නේ ව්‍යාකූලත්වයක් විතරයි.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

ἡ λύσις, ἂν ἁπλῶς δῷ λέγεσθαι, συμπεραίνεται ἐὰν δὲ μὴ συμπεραίνηται, οὐκ ἂν εἴη λύσις ἐν δὲ τοῖς προειρημένοις πάντων διδομένων οὐδέ φαμεν γίνεσθαι συλλογισμόν.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

Aλλ’ ὅπερ ἐλέχθη καὶ πρότερον, οὗτοι πάντες οὐ πρὸς τὸν λόγον ἀλλὰ πρὸς τὸν ἄνθρωπον λύουσιν. Εἰ γὰρ ἦν αὕτη λύσις, δόντα τὸ ἀντικείμενον οὐχ οἷόν τε λύειν, καθάπερ ἐπὶ τῶν ἄλλων οἷον, εἰ ἔστι μὲν ὃ ἔστι δ’ οὐκ ἔστιν,

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@MMmarco0 Ehh, ma lui sa di sapere. La peggiore jattura del clero accademico semicolto.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@Pinperepette Dati di struttura demografica per comune (si trovano in https://t.co/EGWvb1OkwM, ma solo dal 2019) suddivisi per italiani e stranieri.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@progrocksongs What a pain in the ass!

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@Michele_Arnese Trav ne ha bisogno per quando la Mina gli porterà via anche le mutande.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

questo mi serve

[Massimo @Rainmaker1973]

Smart ways to fold your clothes

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@ItaliaViva “S’è rotta la porta del cesso”.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@petunianelsole Avete la fortuna di NON essere clienti ISP? Filiali hub con servizi inesistenti (cassa, cambio valuta, …) , caos organizzativo e personale demotivato, vendita aggressiva di prodotti finanzassicurativi , commissioni monumentali anche sul respiro…

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@vick55top He will fade away like a fart in the outer space.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@itswpceo According to this metric it is correct.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@Pinperepette Non hai mai lavorato in finanza: modelli mostruosi in excel, “una delle cause principali della crisi del 2008”. R fu un enorme passo in avanti.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@EnricoLetta @Corriere Un successone i post di scendiLetta a giudicare dai commenti…

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@boni_castellane Eh, ma io ricordo la nonna (grande saggia) del Tony che diceva sempre: «El temp e'l cü fann quell che voeur lù».

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

For forty years we’ve been told the planet has a single 'global average temperature'—a made-up figure treated as more credible than the weather outside your own window.

The great flaw in this is that there really is no one temperature scenario that applies to any geographical point anywhere on Earth. Not in the way people imagine, any more than there’s a single 'global mood' or 'sense of irony. If you say, 'The planet's average temperature is 15°C', it means absolutely nothing to a person struggling across frost-bitten Siberia or sipping a piña colada on a humid summer's night in Brazil. It's meaningless to human geography and policy.

Statistically, you can average the temperature of a polar ice cap and the Sahara Desert, but the resulting number describes a place that doesn't exist. It’s a computer model—not reality. The concept of a single global temperature metric only makes sense from a cosmic distance. It's a planetary metric, designed for satellites, not human life or geography.

When international bodies focus entirely on moving a single global average by 0.1°C, they treat the Earth as a Lego land thermodynamic system. But the planet doesn't experience climate that way. Earth's climate is fractured into multiple distinct climate zones (roughly 14 separate scenarios) based on lived experiences. All of them are entirely regional, dictated by local topography, ocean currents, vegetation cover, and atmospheric pressure systems.

Tourism campaigns market Hawaii as an idyllic, uniform tropical paradise. But anyone who's actually been there knows the island contains roughly 10 of the world’s 14 distinct climate zones, ranging from continuously wet tropical rainforests to arid deserts, and even alpine tundra on top of Mauna Kea where it snows.

International institutions are quietly backing away from their most extreme 'collapse' scenarios. The entire apparatus was built on a flawed premise - trying to govern the world based on a single, aggregated temperature marker that no human ever actually experiences. The Hawaii analogy shows how local reality obliterates uniform narratives.

The true danger isn't a minor shift in a global statistical average, but the civilisational paralysis from letting central bureaucracies replace reality with ideology.

When an immense institutional and bureaucratic apparatus is built around a specific set of numbers, targets and narratives, it develops an enormous amount of structural inertia. It doesn't just stop or turn on a dime because the underlying assumptions shift.

We’ve elevated heavily processed, continent-sized guesswork into a Holy Scripture, then handed trillion-dollar policy levers to people who treat any questioning of the guess as heresy.

It turns out there is no thermometer big enough to measure 'the Earth'.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@Wilehalm Es ist an der Zeit, dass auch die Deutschen die 'Härten des Lebens' genießen...

[Peter Clack @PeterDClack]

Conventional thinking treats wind and solar as permanent infrastructure. They aren't.

These are a form of short life-cycle, industrial gadgetry with roughly 15-to-25-year lifespans. They are all in various stages of permanent decay and replacement - hydrocarbon and nuclear plants last generations. We see this in the mounting graveyards of unsalvageable wreckage. Yes, much of it can be recycled in theory. But in reality, the economic and energy costs usually outweigh the benefits.

They are now decomposing faster than we can replace them and this is the Treadmill Effect. If a nation installs 5 GW of wind power every year, by Year 20, they aren't expanding the grid anymore. They are being forced to build 5 GW just to replace the rusted, fatigued and degraded turbines built in Year 1. Growth flatlines, swallowed up in pure maintenance.

Look at the scale of this dilemma: despite millions of massive turbines and solar arrays deployed over 40 years, hydrocarbon fuels still dominate at roughly 81% of global primary energy. Solar and wind deliver only a tiny fraction of total primary energy. We've reached the limit.

Almost every turbine and panel built over the last two decades is now in the late stages of decomposition. We're struggling just to keep up; and soon we will fall behind. The mines will become hollowed-out and these 'green' rust collectors will fall apart where they stand.

To feed this replacement treadmill will need an astronomical volume of minerals: like copper, nickel, cobalt and rare earths. But we have already devoured the high-grade ores. A century ago, copper ore was 5% metal. Today, major mines are crushing ore that is less than 0.5% copper.

To get the same tonne of metal, you must blast, haul and crush ten times more rock. This requires more massive, diesel-guzzling mining fleets and heavy industrial smelting. We are cannibalising dense, reliable fossil energy just to chase low-density, short-lived weather collectors.

Here is the Einsteinian paradox. In physics, the closer an object gets to the speed of light, the more massive it becomes, requiring exponentially more energy to move it a fraction further. The energy transition is its own relativistic wall.

The closer a grid gets to 100% renewable penetration, the greater its structural costs will become. You don't just need more panels; you need a parallel universe of over-building, synchronous condensers, and continent-spanning transmission lines just to handle the asynchronous volatility.

We are hitting that Inversion Point. The fossil fuel energy required to mine the rare earths, manufacture the turbines and endlessly replace the dying infrastructure will eventually outpace the net energy the system delivers. You cannot reach the limit of light.

Albert Einstein - the ultimate observer of universal limits - would smile at the irony. Net Zero is being driven by an ideological bureaucracy that reads financial blueprints but ignores the periodic table and the laws of thermodynamics.

Entropy is universal. Nothing can bypass it.

Imagery of rust, mechanical exhaustion and the accumulation of unmanaged composite materials.

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

Anche in Giappone lo sanno...

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@Frances47030564 @ClaudioBorghi

[Adam @I_would_prefer]

@porticodipinto @climacritic Certo, te li ho pagati io.