Ibrahim Ismail

[Anwar Wright @anwarphilly]

Alhamdulilah, what a blessing it is for the UK to have Shaykh @almadani_k at @TawheedCardiff, teaching the Muslims the matters of their religion. May Allah bless the seminar and cause immense benefit by way of it. Ameen.

[Abu Anwar @Abu_Anwar_An]

It is important to understand that the fitnah of Abu Iyaad stemmed from his love of being an authority, severe disrespect for the senior scholars and rejecting accountability. This is the same with those with him. They rejected the advise of the senior scholars during their lives

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

If you're looking for a despicable liar, you have Abū Iyad right there.

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

📄 The Salafī Methodology of Returning to the Scholars and the Deviations of Abū Iyād Regarding It

🖊 Written by: Abū Muhsinah Mubārak

To further crush Abu 'Iyād's recent claims that Shaykh 'Abdullāh al-Bukhārī is incompetent, that "some people in the background" are trying to artificially raise him to the level of the senior scholars, that the praises of the scholars for him are merely "generalised endorsements” and that Shaykh 'Ubayd's explicit referral to him was just a "mistake in translation", we simply present a statement from Shaykh Rabī' - translated by none other than Abu 'Iyād himself!

➤ So what changed?

📎 https://t.co/EqWRi9jhVN

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

📄 The Salafī Methodology of Returning to the Scholars and the Deviations of Abū Iyād Regarding It

🖊 Written by: Abū Muhsinah Mubārak

To further crush Abu 'Iyād's recent claims that Shaykh 'Abdullāh al-Bukhārī is incompetent, that "some people in the background" are trying to artificially raise him to the level of the senior scholars, that the praises of the scholars for him are merely "generalised endorsements” and that Shaykh 'Ubayd's explicit referral to him was just a "mistake in translation", we simply present a statement from Shaykh Rabī' - translated by none other than Abu 'Iyād himself!

➤ So what changed?

📎 https://t.co/EqWRi9jhVN

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

@ArrisaalahPubs Wallahi, it is clear so clear that Abū Iyad is a despicable liar, and everything they are accusing the Scholars of is in them

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

Jazākumullahu khoiro, this uprooted the lie that has been flying around against the Scholars.

[Abu Affān Al-Marzuuq NGR @UthMarzuq]

@AbuAbdullahUK You keep accusing Mashayikh of Aden of revolring against the authority-in support of Aidrus, but when he was removed from his position, these Mashayikh still remain as Imams of the Masajid, a lot of them still working under the Awqaf, none was arrested or declared wanted. Infact

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

This dismantled the lie that is flying around that the Scholars support rebellion

[أبو العباس عبد الكبير بن إبراهيم الطاوسي @Arabicmade88127]

@AbuAbdullahUK The issue is how is someone accused of rebellion then he is working hand in hand with people he rebelled against?

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

@Aadam1192350 @ArrisaalahPubs Perhaps your brain wasn't fully awake when you read the write-up. "You know the stress of seeking sustenance these days" .
Let me help you out. You can read this after you're sure your brain is present. But if you still don't get it, then you need medical help.

[Abu Mu’ādh Taqweem @AbuMuadhTaqweem]

It is a blessing to be back visiting Madīnah once again.

On this ‘Umrah trip we have participants from London, Birmingham, Wolverhampton, Bolton, as well as the Netherlands, and even as far as Sydney, Australia.

I also had the pleasure of meeting with some of our beloved brothers from Nigeria @ArrisaalahPubs who are also visiting currently. It was very encouraging to hear about their da’wah efforts & the progress being made with their masjid project, may Allāh bless them & strengthen their da’wah further.

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

@ArrisaalahPubs Jazākumullahu khoiro.
أَمْ حَسِبَ الَّذِينَ فِي قُلُوبِهِم مَّرَضٌ أَن لَّن يُخْرِجَ اللَّهُ أَضْغَانَهُمْ

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

The arrogance of these individuals - who believed they know better than the senior scholars - did not start today. Even when senior scholars like Shaykh Rabī' and Shaykh 'Ubayd were openly praising Shaykh 'Arafāt, these people refused to accept it. They did not merely reject the scholars' commendations and recommendations, but they also actively cautioned others against the very individuals the senior scholars were praising.

Shaykh Rabī' explicitly recorded an audio encouraging the promotion of Shaykh 'Arafāt's classes, yet Abu 'Iyād proudly declares: "Hence, I never raised or promoted these individuals."

This proves that while the senior scholars were directing the Ummah in one direction, these individuals were secretly steering their followers in another.

Does this mean they also secretly believed the scholars were "deceived by their inner circle," just as the blind followers of Ibn Hādi claimed?

Why, then, do they suddenly present themselves today as the true upholders of the legacy of Shaykh Rabī' and Shaykh 'Ubayd? If they were already rejecting the explicit advice of Shaykh Rabī' and Shaykh 'Ubayd back then, why should anyone be surprised that they are rejecting the statements of Shaykh 'Abdullah al-Bukhārī today?

This rebellious stance perfectly mirrors an encounter we (myself, Abu 'Affān 'Uthmān, and Abul 'Abbās 'Abdul-Kabīr) experienced firsthand on Jumu'ah, October 24, 2025 in the sitting room of Fawwāz al-Madkhali. We asked him about Shaykh Bandar al-Khaybari and he immediately launched into a tirade, insulting the Shaykh, as well as Shaykh 'Abdulilāh Ar-Rifā'i, Shaykh Ahmad Az-Zahrāni, and others.

After finishing his insults, Fawwāz said: "You see that these people that Muhammad bin Hādi spoke against, he was 100% correct in what he used in describing them..." He then proceeded to repeat the very insults Ibn Hādi had uttered against them, approving of them one by one, before concluding with the shocking claim: "Ibn Hādi was 100% correct in his description, only that he was hasty!"

May Allah bless the scholars who accurately stated that this current fitnah is merely a continuation of the fitnah of Muhammad bin Hādi.

May Allah protect us from their fitnah.

Mubaarak Ismail
27/9/2026

[Abu Affān Al-Marzuuq NGR @UthMarzuq]

Refuting Some Of The Doubts Of The Misguided Deceiver Who Permits The Celebration Of The Prophet’s Birthday

Shaykh Abū Isḥāq Al-Hilālī Al-Marzūqī

https://t.co/3ViDrBvaDx

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

📄 Contradictions of Abū Iyāḍ Regarding Testing Only with “Great Scholars”

🖊 Written by: Abū Kawthar Lukmān bn Abdir-Raūf

Abū Iyāḍ now claims that people can only be tested with scholars of the calibre of Ibn Bāz, Ibn ʿUthaymīn, al-Albānī, and Muqbil. Yet in his own earlier words, he affirmed testing people with the “well-known people of the Sunnah” in their lands and explicitly explained the validity and benefit of this principle.

➤ So what changed?

📎 https://t.co/zwKEBkdRRh

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

@on1ycharmz Read about the inception of the fitnah of Abū Iyaad and learn then you'll come to know that he shares the same aim with his gang members ( nijār and co ) which is basically attacking the Scholars and bringing them down just like the haddadis did.

https://t.co/H8ZulrO8K1

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

Abu Iyaad and his cohorts have split the Salafiyoon just like Ibn Hadi did but Al-hamdulillah the Scholars are not with him and his affair has been made clear to the sincere ones

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

📄 Refuting the False Claims of al-Hudhaifī and Abū Iyāḍ and Exposing Their Inconsistencies

🖊️ Written by: Abū Kawthar Lukmān bn Abdir-Raūf

ʿAlī al-Hudhaifī, Abū Iyāḍ, and Bilāl as-Sālimī have all made statements concerning the scholarly standing of Shaykh ʿAbdullāh al-Bukhārī. Yet Bilāl previously described him as one of the foremost scholars of al-Jarḥ wa al-Taʿdīl and among the most prominent representatives of the field, whereas today his scholarly standing is being denied and undermined.

➤ Their own statements expose the contradiction.

📎 https://t.co/rlINPaEE5l

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

Al-hamdulillah, may Allah use this to guide his sincere slaves

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

📄 A Reminder on What Caused the Fitnah of Amjad Rafīq (Abū Iyaad of Salafi Publications)

🖊 Written by: Abū Anwar An-Naijiriyy

Amjad Rafiq and his followers continue to try all means to confuse and distort the origin and genesis of affairs in order to claim acquittal in what he started and caused. The fitnah of Abu Iyaad did not start when the one whose truthfulness or precision has not been attested to narrated from another person that Shaykh Arafaat said: "we consider him to be an innovator", nor did it begin with other red herrings that his followers throw at real issues and actions of their leader.

📎 https://t.co/QhQOMwjzZV

[Ar-risaalah Publications @ArrisaalahPubs]

📘 NEW PDF

📄 A Reminder on What Caused the Fitnah of Amjad Rafīq (Abū Iyaad of Salafi Publications)

🖊 Written by: Abū Anwar An-Naijiriyy

Amjad Rafiq and his followers continue to try all means to confuse and distort the origin and genesis of affairs in order to claim acquittal in what he started and caused. The fitnah of Abu Iyaad did not start when the one whose truthfulness or precision has not been attested to narrated from another person that Shaykh Arafaat said: "we consider him to be an innovator", nor did it begin with other red herrings that his followers throw at real issues and actions of their leader.

📎 https://t.co/QhQOMwjzZV

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

@on1ycharmz Moreover, Alī and Nijār were respected then when they were upon steadfastness and respecting the Scholars but today Nijār has branded all those that don't support him as hizb-al-jaded and Sūfiyatul-bukhāry, making a blanket tabdee' upon the Salafiyoon. Subhānallah.

[Ibrahim Ismail @IbrahimIsm1376]

@on1ycharmz Stop playing around and be sincere, we never promoted Ali nor Nijaar as scholars whom affairs should be returned to rather all the Salafiyoon were united upon returning affairs to Shaykh Rabee', Shaykh 'Ubaid and Shaykh Abdullah Al-Bukhāry.

[Lukman Abdulrauf @dashboard_exp]

@AdnanIshmam @ArrisaalahPubs Out of hatred for this noble Shaikh and seeing how the Salafī youths love him, he declared we Salafīs to be "Suufiyyatul bukhaarii" (Sufīs of Bukhārī), this is clear cut tabdī (declaring to be innovators), but you won't see Abū Iyād talking about this.

Allahul-Mustahaan