![thejaylino's tweet photo. For months, an online Telegram group calling itself “One Future” (@TheOneFutureOrg) has slithered throughout Fascist circles. Its administrators have presented themselves as “comrades-in-arms” on the path to national renewal.
They are nothing of the sort. “One Future” is not Fascist. The individual behind this online propaganda group is an overt communist, a follower of the Italian left-communist Amadeo Bordiga, who has donned the mask of Fascism for the sole purpose of infiltrating, dividing, and ultimately destroying Fascism from within.
Despite nearly two years of operation, this organization has produced absolutely nothing of substance. They have not organized a single time, nor recruited a single serious activist. They have not published a single original work other than their poorly written “manifesto” that they finally released this summer after being mocked regarding their doing-nothing character, and they have not established a single functional chapter anywhere in the world.
The leader of “One Future” has been foolish enough to record his own ideological confession in public messages.
“Labor unions only hinder the revolutionary potential of the people and make them concede to half-measures like ‘higher wages’ or ‘individual liberties’.”
“Labor unions are fundamentally a contradiction to socialism as a stage of development towards a society free of such capitalist abstractions.”
“I want the dissolution of the old ways [unions] which are the slow death of the proletariat.”
"The goal is to abolish private property..."
These are the obvious words of a Marxist. The same individual went on to speak of "organic centralism, guided by the science of Logic at base of Idealism". It could not be clearer: This is an unambiguous attempt to use the philosophical language of Fascism to justify a communist organizational model that would ultimately abolish the very state that Fascism champions.
“Organic centralism” is a specific term of art in left-communist circles. It was advanced in The Lyons Theses (1926) by Amadeo Bordiga, the founder of the Communist Party of Italy, as a rejection of Vladimir Lenin’s democratic centralism. In Bordiga’s words:
“The democratic criterion has been for us so far a material and incidental factor... it is not an indispensable platform for them. Therefore we will not raise the organizational formula known as ‘democratic centralism’ to the level of a principle. Democracy cannot be a principle for us. Centralism is indisputably one.”
The “One Future” leadership is not just communist. They are the worst kind of communist, the kind that lies about what they are.
The Charter of Labour, the foundational document of Fascist corporatism, explicitly rejected the "One Future" Marxist view of unions as obstacles to revolution (a view they share with Rosa Luxembourg). It established a system of “corporazioni” that integrated workers and employers into the fabric of the State. Strikes and lockouts were prohibited only due to the fact that the presence of organized labor in the corporazioni gave Italian workers parity with employers. Disputes by organized labor were settled by state courts, and the producer was recognized as a pillar of the nation.
Benito Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile, in the “Doctrine of Fascism” (1932), wrote:
“It is in the corporation that fascist syndicalism indeed finds its goal. Syndicalism, of every school, has a course that could be called common... But while socialist syndicalism, by the path of class struggle, ends on the political ground with a final programme of suppressing private property and individual initiative, fascist syndicalism, through class collaboration, leads to the corporation, which that collaboration must render systematic and harmonic, safeguarding property but elevating it to a social function.”
“One Future” heavily features the ideals of Ugo Spirito. Unlike orthodox Fascists, Spirito championed “integral corporatism,” a system where ownership of the means of production would be concentrated solely in the hands of employees. His ideas were considered so ridiculous that Mussolini personally denied him permission to publish one of his books on his theories. “One Future” upholds a fringe economic program that Fascism itself ultimately rejected.
And it is here that one must come to terms with the fact that One Future is a fundamentally contradictory and nonsensical organization.
Fascism has always faced threats from without, but the most insidious threats come from within. The “One Future” group is a Trojan Horse designed to divide the Fascist movement by presenting a false version of Fascism that is communism in disguise.
They want to promote Marxist ideology under the banner of “Fascism” to confuse young activists and lead them into inaction. But above all, they want to demoralize genuine Fascists by presenting a degraded, confused, and intellectually bankrupt version of their ideology.
The "One Future" organization's logo features the Nazi Black Sun, a symbol with no relevance to Fascism. They themselves have admitted that this is a deliberate dog whistle designed to attract neo-Nazis and white supremacists while maintaining plausible deniability. They, just as the Rindersteak communists of the 1930s did, intend to signal to racial supremacists and biological racists that they are welcome in their community.
Make no mistake, this is a confused, contradictory, and morally bankrupt collection of online roleplayers, no different from the rest, who have never involved themselves in community service in their entire existence.
Today, there are plenty of organizations ready and willing to commit to action for the public good, including the New Nationalists of America (NNA) (@nnausa_), an organization that I have had the immense honor chairing, and one which advocates for protecting the American producer.
I'm sure everybody fully understands how fun it can be to sit behind a keyboard and LARP about the 1920s and 30s, but it is time for people to grow up. Either get active or get out.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HP8xnQsbAAAHLJ6.jpg)
Olivia
Online
Ice Age
@IceAgeBanderite
I am a whistleblower and researcher of left-wing and reformist factions in UPA and OUN(b), Leftist Banderite(left-banderite).
Vatican City
Joined June 2024
123 Following
55 Followers
1.7K Posts
@RedwolfAlice @ShtLnd_ @Poochisxz2 UPA for example: https://t.co/fCsOxYtdBl
Every self-respecting Ukrainian democratic socialist ultranationalist uses red and black.
@azelf_steel Ебеньград mentioned
@JayTone382636 @VlStarodubtsev @UnspookedS Bolsheviks ≠ communists, Bolsheviks were a very specific faction of communists and those ukrainian bolsheviks in so-called Ukrainian SSR choose to be collaborationists, their puppets and slaves.
@JayTone382636 @VlStarodubtsev @UnspookedS They were mere foreign puppets and collaborators just like Donetsk People's Republic and Lughanks People's Republic, no civil war there(though admittedly some of them haven't had the worst intentions towards Ukraine unlike DPR or LPR, but they chose to be slaves to bolsheviks).
@TrueMadFury @shakhrayist Неправильный подход к временной линии, Коновалец сначала на стороне УНР убивал большевиков, а потом брал у СССР и Германии деньги, потом СССР прекратил инвестиции.
Это не наивно ибо я предоставил цитату из письма Сциборскому, т.е его настоящее личное мнение про самого себя.
@TrueMadFury @shakhrayist 1932 вроде как не начало его карьеры, даже ближе к её концу.
По большевикам также стреляли левые Эсеры, не говоря о том что Коновалец также стрелял по правому мятежнику Оскилько, так что его лояльность была к левому правительству УНР.
Потому что СССР перестал деньги давать.
@pc_suffering @minimagnus2 Интересно получается, а чего же тогда Ярош из Днепра а не Ивано-Франковска?
Почему мэр Конотопа из ВО Свобода?
Бандеровщина это пан-украинское движение за демократию, Галичина и Волынь объективно просто более продвинуты чем остальная Украина, вот там бандеровцев и больше.
@TrueMadFury @shakhrayist «Моя психічна структура наскрізь революційна, ба більше: я завважую, що з бігом часу прогресую не направо, а наліво».
— Єв��ен Коновалець, 1932 р.
Представь исп��льзовать ИИ от Гугла вместо реальных фактов
@minimagnus2 Вообще раньше(ещё во времена бредового Волынского Братства) задумывалось что эта механика будет влиять на силу фракций и их стартовые территории.
Но потом это слили, дали фракциям предписанный уровень силы + пред��ачертанные стартовые локации, а механику оставили :)
До перепоховання Коновальця
Я вже казав, що ставлюся негативно до таких перепоховань. Вони жахливо впливають на все — на дискусію, на сімʼї, на зем��ю навколо. Буквально, на кожному кроці був зроблений провал — як наприклад при похованні Мельника, де союз українок люксембургу намагався захистити сімʼю Мельників від того, що фактично було викраданням могили.
Все це глумління над могилами — це не про повагу до історії, і робиться не для того, щоб в нас краще поважали і розуміли історію.
З усім сказаним — варто відзначати і відділяти — повагу до Коновальця і весь фарс з перепохованням.
Лівим і поступовцям нема чого вважати Коновальця ворогом — за рефлексом, або через неприязнь до того державного гротеску і прихильність ультраправих до його персони — занадто довго чи західними лівими, чи російсько-радянськими, чи нашими ультраправими створювалось абсолютно викривлене бачення української історії. Історично, Коновалець заслужив повагу як радикально-соціалістичних, так поміркованих і націоналістичних (крім бандерівських і гетьманівських) кіл. Коновалець був хорошим офіцером, який підтримував своїх вояків, в тому числі і у повстанні проти автократії Скоропадського.
Зі згадок — Винниченком, Шаповалом, Мазепою і Феденком — Коновалець оцінювався як позитивна фігура. І я не знайшов причин, чому ця оцінка повинна бути негативною.
«Моя психічна структура наскрізь революційна, ба більше: я завважую, що з бігом часу прогресую не направо, а наліво».
— Євген Коновалець, 1932 р.
Unconditional love
For months, an online Telegram group calling itself “One Future” (@TheOneFutureOrg) has slithered throughout Fascist circles. Its administrators have presented themselves as “comrades-in-arms” on the path to national renewal.
They are nothing of the sort. “One Future” is not Fascist. The individual behind this online propaganda group is an overt communist, a follower of the Italian left-communist Amadeo Bordiga, who has donned the mask of Fascism for the sole purpose of infiltrating, dividing, and ultimately destroying Fascism from within.
Despite nearly two years of operation, this organization has produced absolutely nothing of substance. They have not organized a single time, nor recruited a single serious activist. They have not published a single original work other than their poorly written “manifesto” that they finally released this summer after being mocked regarding their doing-nothing character, and they have not established a single functional chapter anywhere in the world.
The leader of “One Future” has been foolish enough to record his own ideological confession in public messages.
“Labor unions only hinder the revolutionary potential of the people and make them concede to half-measures like ‘higher wages’ or ‘individual liberties’.”
“Labor unions are fundamentally a contradiction to socialism as a stage of development towards a society free of such capitalist abstractions.”
“I want the dissolution of the old ways [unions] which are the slow death of the proletariat.”
"The goal is to abolish private property..."
These are the obvious words of a Marxist. The same individual went on to speak of "organic centralism, guided by the science of Logic at base of Idealism". It could not be clearer: This is an unambiguous attempt to use the philosophical language of Fascism to justify a communist organizational model that would ultimately abolish the very state that Fascism champions.
“Organic centralism” is a specific term of art in left-communist circles. It was advanced in The Lyons Theses (1926) by Amadeo Bordiga, the founder of the Communist Party of Italy, as a rejection of Vladimir Lenin’s democratic centralism. In Bordiga’s words:
“The democratic criterion has been for us so far a material and incidental factor... it is not an indispensable platform for them. Therefore we will not raise the organizational formula known as ‘democratic centralism’ to the level of a principle. Democracy cannot be a principle for us. Centralism is indisputably one.”
The “One Future” leadership is not just communist. They are the worst kind of communist, the kind that lies about what they are.
The Charter of Labour, the foundational document of Fascist corporatism, explicitly rejected the "One Future" Marxist view of unions as obstacles to revolution (a view they share with Rosa Luxembourg). It established a system of “corporazioni” that integrated workers and employers into the fabric of the State. Strikes and lockouts were prohibited only due to the fact that the presence of organized labor in the corporazioni gave Italian workers parity with employers. Disputes by organized labor were settled by state courts, and the producer was recognized as a pillar of the nation.
Benito Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile, in the “Doctrine of Fascism” (1932), wrote:
“It is in the corporation that fascist syndicalism indeed finds its goal. Syndicalism, of every school, has a course that could be called common... But while socialist syndicalism, by the path of class struggle, ends on the political ground with a final programme of suppressing private property and individual initiative, fascist syndicalism, through class collaboration, leads to the corporation, which that collaboration must render systematic and harmonic, safeguarding property but elevating it to a social function.”
“One Future” heavily features the ideals of Ugo Spirito. Unlike orthodox Fascists, Spirito championed “integral corporatism,” a system where ownership of the means of production would be concentrated solely in the hands of employees. His ideas were considered so ridiculous that Mussolini personally denied him permission to publish one of his books on his theories. “One Future” upholds a fringe economic program that Fascism itself ultimately rejected.
And it is here that one must come to terms with the fact that One Future is a fundamentally contradictory and nonsensical organization.
Fascism has always faced threats from without, but the most insidious threats come from within. The “One Future” group is a Trojan Horse designed to divide the Fascist movement by presenting a false version of Fascism that is communism in disguise.
They want to promote Marxist ideology under the banner of “Fascism” to confuse young activists and lead them into inaction. But above all, they want to demoralize genuine Fascists by presenting a degraded, confused, and intellectually bankrupt version of their ideology.
The "One Future" organization's logo features the Nazi Black Sun, a symbol with no relevance to Fascism. They themselves have admitted that this is a deliberate dog whistle designed to attract neo-Nazis and white supremacists while maintaining plausible deniability. They, just as the Rindersteak communists of the 1930s did, intend to signal to racial supremacists and biological racists that they are welcome in their community.
Make no mistake, this is a confused, contradictory, and morally bankrupt collection of online roleplayers, no different from the rest, who have never involved themselves in community service in their entire existence.
Today, there are plenty of organizations ready and willing to commit to action for the public good, including the New Nationalists of America (NNA) (@nnausa_), an organization that I have had the immense honor chairing, and one which advocates for protecting the American producer.
I'm sure everybody fully understands how fun it can be to sit behind a keyboard and LARP about the 1920s and 30s, but it is time for people to grow up. Either get active or get out.
![thejaylino's tweet photo. For months, an online Telegram group calling itself “One Future” (@TheOneFutureOrg) has slithered throughout Fascist circles. Its administrators have presented themselves as “comrades-in-arms” on the path to national renewal.
They are nothing of the sort. “One Future” is not Fascist. The individual behind this online propaganda group is an overt communist, a follower of the Italian left-communist Amadeo Bordiga, who has donned the mask of Fascism for the sole purpose of infiltrating, dividing, and ultimately destroying Fascism from within.
Despite nearly two years of operation, this organization has produced absolutely nothing of substance. They have not organized a single time, nor recruited a single serious activist. They have not published a single original work other than their poorly written “manifesto” that they finally released this summer after being mocked regarding their doing-nothing character, and they have not established a single functional chapter anywhere in the world.
The leader of “One Future” has been foolish enough to record his own ideological confession in public messages.
“Labor unions only hinder the revolutionary potential of the people and make them concede to half-measures like ‘higher wages’ or ‘individual liberties’.”
“Labor unions are fundamentally a contradiction to socialism as a stage of development towards a society free of such capitalist abstractions.”
“I want the dissolution of the old ways [unions] which are the slow death of the proletariat.”
"The goal is to abolish private property..."
These are the obvious words of a Marxist. The same individual went on to speak of "organic centralism, guided by the science of Logic at base of Idealism". It could not be clearer: This is an unambiguous attempt to use the philosophical language of Fascism to justify a communist organizational model that would ultimately abolish the very state that Fascism champions.
“Organic centralism” is a specific term of art in left-communist circles. It was advanced in The Lyons Theses (1926) by Amadeo Bordiga, the founder of the Communist Party of Italy, as a rejection of Vladimir Lenin’s democratic centralism. In Bordiga’s words:
“The democratic criterion has been for us so far a material and incidental factor... it is not an indispensable platform for them. Therefore we will not raise the organizational formula known as ‘democratic centralism’ to the level of a principle. Democracy cannot be a principle for us. Centralism is indisputably one.”
The “One Future” leadership is not just communist. They are the worst kind of communist, the kind that lies about what they are.
The Charter of Labour, the foundational document of Fascist corporatism, explicitly rejected the "One Future" Marxist view of unions as obstacles to revolution (a view they share with Rosa Luxembourg). It established a system of “corporazioni” that integrated workers and employers into the fabric of the State. Strikes and lockouts were prohibited only due to the fact that the presence of organized labor in the corporazioni gave Italian workers parity with employers. Disputes by organized labor were settled by state courts, and the producer was recognized as a pillar of the nation.
Benito Mussolini and Giovanni Gentile, in the “Doctrine of Fascism” (1932), wrote:
“It is in the corporation that fascist syndicalism indeed finds its goal. Syndicalism, of every school, has a course that could be called common... But while socialist syndicalism, by the path of class struggle, ends on the political ground with a final programme of suppressing private property and individual initiative, fascist syndicalism, through class collaboration, leads to the corporation, which that collaboration must render systematic and harmonic, safeguarding property but elevating it to a social function.”
“One Future” heavily features the ideals of Ugo Spirito. Unlike orthodox Fascists, Spirito championed “integral corporatism,” a system where ownership of the means of production would be concentrated solely in the hands of employees. His ideas were considered so ridiculous that Mussolini personally denied him permission to publish one of his books on his theories. “One Future” upholds a fringe economic program that Fascism itself ultimately rejected.
And it is here that one must come to terms with the fact that One Future is a fundamentally contradictory and nonsensical organization.
Fascism has always faced threats from without, but the most insidious threats come from within. The “One Future” group is a Trojan Horse designed to divide the Fascist movement by presenting a false version of Fascism that is communism in disguise.
They want to promote Marxist ideology under the banner of “Fascism” to confuse young activists and lead them into inaction. But above all, they want to demoralize genuine Fascists by presenting a degraded, confused, and intellectually bankrupt version of their ideology.
The "One Future" organization's logo features the Nazi Black Sun, a symbol with no relevance to Fascism. They themselves have admitted that this is a deliberate dog whistle designed to attract neo-Nazis and white supremacists while maintaining plausible deniability. They, just as the Rindersteak communists of the 1930s did, intend to signal to racial supremacists and biological racists that they are welcome in their community.
Make no mistake, this is a confused, contradictory, and morally bankrupt collection of online roleplayers, no different from the rest, who have never involved themselves in community service in their entire existence.
Today, there are plenty of organizations ready and willing to commit to action for the public good, including the New Nationalists of America (NNA) (@nnausa_), an organization that I have had the immense honor chairing, and one which advocates for protecting the American producer.
I'm sure everybody fully understands how fun it can be to sit behind a keyboard and LARP about the 1920s and 30s, but it is time for people to grow up. Either get active or get out.](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HP8xrckaoAAIuGV.png)
@CameliaAB1 @RamabajaDardan Ukraine does not bleed to protect international law, it bleeds to protect it's own nation.
We betrayed informal trust kosovars had in us, for they believed that if Serbs are "naturally" pro-russian then they must be "naturally" pro-ukrainian, but it was all very informal.
@stafidaa_ 1918-1929
@Agapiy_ @Ravvenrotth As opposed to Shukhevych who found Soviet Union at peace post-may 1945.
Everyone can win a guerilla war against a state in active war, UPA was actively liberating territory from both Nazis(https://t.co/fv5uIdKUF1) and Soviets while those 2 were at war, just like Tito had.
@Agapiy_ @Ravvenrotth Tito had found Germany stuck in WW2 and incapable of commuting full forces to counter-insurgency, his story would've been much different if Germany wasn't stuck in WW2.
Banderite forces of democracy were also liberating Ukraine by themselves:
https://t.co/ZphASthMyC
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.1M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
113.7M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.5M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.7M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
89.6M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
83.5M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
72.7M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.7M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
65.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.9M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
62.6M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers