@WhiteyPowers83@Know_More_News It's very telling when him pointing out something absolutely central and obvious about your religion causes you to reply with a baseless accusation
@vrilluminus@SolBrah Aajonus(named himself) was a paranoid kook that referred to himself as a PhD with no actual credentials and made up a wild origin story for himself with zero verifiable evidence such as claiming that he had a terminal cancer diagnosis which he cured with a raw juice diet
Anti-pagan posting is a coping mechanism that gives e-Catholics a sense of power that they lack irl, since their Church today is just another leftist organization participating in the destruction of their countries. It is an outlet that allows for an illusion of "basedness" contrary to reality. Not healthy imo. I will pray for you.
In this clip, Nick Fuentes begs people to “get back to what we can observe and independently verify in reality” and calls for “a return to reason and rationality,” arguing that conspiracy thinking has become a logical problem where every disproven conspiracy just gets folded into another conspiracy.
He encourages people to actually read because the books, libraries and information are all available for free online, before concluding that the elites don’t even need to distract anyone because “the goy are distracting themselves.”
@Sydney_Carton34@Know_More_News You're thinking of a modern single celled organism when the earliest forms of life were far far less complex. Some of the building blocks like amino acids have even been found on asteroids. Actually do some research into it, you will realize just how plausible it is.
@yoursimmo11 Buying into this requires that you lack an understanding of the biology & chemistry the article is interacting with. Yes, it's good to get nutrients from whole foods in many cases, but the rest of this is just baseless assertion and anecdotes in contradiction with reliable data.
Christianity, Judaism & Islam have somehow convinced the world that what you believe about the past and about the nature of god is somehow tied to virtue.
As if by just simply aligning your worldview with a specific religious sect magically makes you worthy of eternal salvation and gives you access to higher consciousness.
It is intellectual poison that has led to massive amounts of brain rot across the world.
@sailingdev@JJones333111@SolBrah Yeah there's like a billion year window for this so it's not that impressive. But still interesting, perhaps it has something to do(or nothing at all to do) with the particular form of life we have here on the planet, just not as much of a coincidence when you look into the data
@JJones333111@SolBrah The moon is moving away from earth as it has been since the beginning, meaning that at one point it was not the appropriate distance from the sun for a perfect eclipse, and at one point in the future it will not be again. Thoughts?
@gildednotsure@Know_More_News@jacobthefoolish Just as an example, there are tens, maybe hundreds of millions more Christian Zionists around the world than Jewish Zionists- giving support in the form of money, manpower, votes etc.
Outside of the Bible—there is not a single contemporary source—not one—from Canaanite, Ugaritic, Hittite, Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian or ANY source that mentions/supports the historicity of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, or 12 Tribes BEFORE the 4th CENTURY BCE.
0 archaeological data too.
And the Torah (Genesis) claims that Abraham led armies and fought wars and was granted lands by a “King of Salem” named “Melchizedek” who also is nowhere to be found in any contemporary sources and whose name just happens to line up with a known Phoenician/Ugaritic deity who was called Zydyk צ־ד־ק
also a referred to as mlky ṣdq (Melech-Sydyk). A local king deity of the local pantheon equated with Zeus/Jupiter.
A classic euhemerism which also suggests a Hellenistic dating of the story, since Euhemerus and euhemrism was popular in Alexandria in the 4th/3rd BCE.
If Abraham was fighting wars in the Levant you would think the contemporary sources would reflect this and we would find something to support this in the archaeological data.
For over a millennium—we have nothing in the historical record that mentions or supports the historicity of anyone on this entire genealogy chart shown below.
Only AFTER 400 BCE, towards Hellenistic period, do we start getting fragments from writers who have knowledge of Abraham and the 12 tribes of Israel.
Every single source that mentions Israel before this never mentions 12 tribes or Abraham or Moses but only the two kingdoms of Judah & Israel are referred to as well as the kings like David, Omri, Hezekiah, Zedekiah, Josiah, etc.
@Dlowe_RTR@santichristo@Gnosisinformant No, but you could imagine there's a bit of a conflict of interest there no? If we can't verify it outside of a church tradition adopted much later, what value does it have in terms of determining what is actually true?