@jimmythelazy@anarchistLARPer These tactics originated with an anarchist federation in Uruguay called the fAu, which won worker concessions during the Cold War despite repression from Uruguay, Argentina, and the U.S. under Operation Condor.
@jimmythelazy@anarchistLARPer I'm not an anarchist; I'm just curious about the movement. But anarchist organizations (that I'm aware of) nowadays organize within worker, tenant, and student movements while imbuing them with anarchist values and practices, using them as a means to a larger end.
@jimmythelazy@anarchistLARPer Because it does? The victor will be the most organized. Until an anarchist army actually exists and fights the U.S. military, it’s all speculation. Anarchists usually deal with practical work: organizing the working class, building collective power, and spreading anarchist
@jimmythelazy@anarchistLARPer Anarchist nations are an oxymoron. A question like that is reserved for the ‘anarchist army’ in that situation. My guess is that they reach a decision via majority voting, bind that resolution to all members, and hold accountable anyone who acts against it
@mikeysmisery@lijahdotdotjpeg@studiopillboy They’re right about racism being part of the class war tbh. The problem is upholding FDR’s social reforms, which weren’t revolutionary in nature and were meant to give certain concessions to certain sections of the proletariat in order to pacify them.
@pashtunmarxism The Bakunin text you're referring to is from the unpublished manuscript of The Knouto-Germanic Empire and the Social Revolution. It wasn't publicly available until 1882, which is a decade after on authority is written.
@no_yimmy@EcoTechBro By organizing the proletariat to defend themselves and meet their needs. Bombs and supply chains only exist because workers produce and maintain them. Since the proletariat reproduces the conditions of its own exploitation, it also has the power to abolish them