Islamofascists are trying so hard to cling to alt right as they did with alt left in order to isolate Israel more. Cowards on a DNA level, lose wars and then lie about the slaughter of innocent civilians they by themselves slaughter. Not a peep about just recent slaughter of Iranian civilians by the regime. You are disease of humanity.
@PalestinaVence Why Muslims are such pathetic baby crying piece of shits? You genocide women and children for sport on daily basis and support such practice against your enemies and yet you dare to blame Israel for literally Hamas fake propaganda.
@EthanLevins2 Dear prophets,
Israel has supposedly been on the verge of collapse for 77 years. At some point, repeatedly predicting the same outcome and being wrong stops being foresight and starts being a hobby.
That’s exactly my point. Instead of addressing the historical or factual questions, you’ve reduced everything to motives: “victim card,” “Holocaust,” “propaganda,” “narratives.” Once every disagreement is explained away as manipulation, there’s no discussion left to have.
You began with “all of Israel is stolen land.” After multiple exchanges, that claim still hasn’t been defended, it’s just been replaced by a series of accusations and assumptions about anyone who disagrees with you.
Calling Israel a “religious fascist regime” isn’t an argument. It’s just another label. I’ve asked you to defend your original claim, but instead of answering, you’ve moved from stolen land to genocide to journalists to fascism. If your case were as strong as you think, you wouldn’t need a new accusation every time the previous one is challenged.
The problem with your argument is that every event is filtered through one lens. When Palestinians are harmed, it’s proof of Israeli evil. When Israelis are murdered, kidnapped, stabbed, shot, or hit by rockets, it’s context, resistance, or ignored entirely.
You mention settlers, journalists, civilian casualties, and UN reports, but never mention decades of attacks against Israelis or the fact that many victims receive a fraction of the international attention. That’s not a balanced human-rights position, it’s selective outrage.
If your standard is that violence against civilians is wrong, apply it consistently. If your standard changes depending on who the victim is, then you’re arguing politics, not principles.
You’re appealing to authority rather than addressing the argument. If genocide is already an established fact, then why is it still being litigated and debated internationally? Serious legal questions are decided by evidence and legal standards, not by counting how many activists, NGOs, or UN officials agree with one side.
The problem with your analogy is that it assumes there was one clear owner, one clear thief, and one clear victim. History isn’t that simple. The land was part of the Ottoman Empire, then the British Mandate. Jews and Arabs both lived there, both developed national movements, and both claimed rights to the land. That’s why comparing it to someone stealing your bedroom doesn’t really fit.
@zannroz Even if a casualty figure is accepted, a casualty count by itself does not prove genocide. Otherwise every war with large civilian casualties would automatically be genocide. That’s why genocide has a legal definition based on intent, not simply body counts.