@lominoodles1161 the only reason nobody has found this yet is because it's a synthesis of cutting edge science that was published only in recent months, but someone else will find it, soon enough. i'm really curious what happens then.
@lominoodles1161 it's a mix of physics, field theory, particle fuckery, psychology, neuroscience, and a few other disparate minor topics from other fields
@lominoodles1161 the weight of my research. it's really interesting. i finally explained it in a way that got people to understand it. my abstract conceptual synthesis is so far ahead of the rest of humanity this was almost impossible before even though i was saying the same thing.
wow the rest of you are getting mogged by AI badly. when it finds my model for qualia transference based on nonlocality, i'll be impressed, but for now, human created in a lab > AI > regular human
We’re sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics.
The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra.
The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.
AI is probably stealing my work right now like it did Naiver-Stokes but luckily i don't really care about prestige. still, the consequences of someone else knowing how to do that are... concerning
Seriously, the more I think about this, the angrier I get. If a trillion-dollar company gets wind of the fact that you're close to a career-defining result, they can dispatch a team, equipped with a private model that has been trained on everything that's ever been publicly . . .