For Immediate Release
NAPA Condemns Deadly Attack on Journalist, Writer and Thinker Budh Singh Neelon; Demands Swift Justice
June 12,2026-The North American Punjabi Association (NAPA) strongly condemns the brutal attack on renowned journalist, writer, and social thinker Budh Singh Neelon. Such violent acts against members of the media and intellectual community are an attack not only on an individual but also on the fundamental principles of freedom of expression, democracy, and the public's right to know.
NAPA Executive Director Satnam Singh Chahal expressed deep concern over the incident and stated that journalists and writers play a vital role in shaping public discourse, exposing injustice, and strengthening democratic institutions. Any attempt to silence independent voices through violence is unacceptable and must be dealt with firmly under the law.
"The attack on Budh Singh Neelon has shocked Punjabis across the world. A society that fails to protect its journalists, writers, and thinkers risks weakening the very foundations of democracy. We strongly condemn this cowardly act and stand in solidarity with Budh Singh Neelon, his family, colleagues, and supporters during this difficult time," said Chahal.
NAPA urged the Punjab Government and law enforcement agencies to conduct a fair, transparent, and time-bound investigation into the attack and ensure that all those responsible, including any conspirators behind the incident, are identified and brought to justice without delay. The organization also called for enhanced security measures for journalists and social commentators who often face threats due to their professional work.
The association emphasized that attacks on media persons create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation that undermines democratic values and discourages independent journalism. Protecting journalists is essential for maintaining transparency, accountability, and public trust in governance.
NAPA further appealed to civil society organizations, media bodies, and human rights groups to unite in demanding justice and ensuring that such incidents are not repeated in the future.
The North American Punjabi Association stands firmly for press freedom, human rights, and the safety of all journalists and writers. NAPA will continue to monitor the case closely and hopes that justice will be delivered swiftly and impartially.@etribune@thewirehindi@ThePrintIndia@TheQuint@dailypostpunjab@TheSiasatDaily@IndianExpress@divya5521@ptcnews@etribune@1158APFront5aab@Gurpreet0531@thetribunechd@htTweets@TheHindu@manaman_chhina
@inderpreet
MIDLAND, Texas (AP) — A shooting Friday in Midland, Texas, left one person dead and nine others in the hospital, Mayor Lori Blong said.
A suspect remained in a standoff with officers about two hours after the shooting, police said.
The shooting started around 8 a.m. in one part of the city before ending up near a veterinary hospital.
It sounded like at least 40 shots were fired, said Andrea Mendias who works at an automobile body shop near the veterinary hospital.
Indian politics has long been marked by the phenomenon of political defections. Leaders rise within a party, enjoy positions of power and prominence, and then, when circumstances change, switch loyalties in search of personal gain or political survival. The story of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) is no exception. Over the years, several prominent leaders who once stood shoulder-to-shoulder with West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee have left the party, joined rival camps, or openly challenged the leadership that helped build their political careers.
The history of AITC is filled with examples of leaders who benefited from the party's organisational strength and Mamata Banerjee's mass appeal, only to abandon the party when political opportunities appeared elsewhere. Many Members of Parliament and senior leaders who won elections under the Trinamool Congress banner later distanced themselves from the party. Such departures have repeatedly sparked debates about loyalty, ideology, and the growing culture of political opportunism in India.
ममता दीदी कुछ याद है या भूल गयीं? आप के आपके सारे विधायक सांसद उतावले हो रहे बीजेपी में जाने के लिए सबका घमंड टूटेगा धीरे धीरे पहले तेजस्वी यादव का हुवा अब दीदी का अगला नम्बर आप को मालूम ही होगा ...😄
Indian politics has long been marked by the phenomenon of political defections. Leaders rise within a party, enjoy positions of power and prominence, and then, when circumstances change, switch loyalties in search of personal gain or political survival. The story of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) is no exception. Over the years, several prominent leaders who once stood shoulder-to-shoulder with West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee have left the party, joined rival camps, or openly challenged the leadership that helped build their political careers.
The history of AITC is filled with examples of leaders who benefited from the party's organisational strength and Mamata Banerjee's mass appeal, only to abandon the party when political opportunities appeared elsewhere. Many Members of Parliament and senior leaders who won elections under the Trinamool Congress banner later distanced themselves from the party. Such departures have repeatedly sparked debates about loyalty, ideology, and the growing culture of political opportunism in India.
Indian politics has long been marked by the phenomenon of political defections. Leaders rise within a party, enjoy positions of power and prominence, and then, when circumstances change, switch loyalties in search of personal gain or political survival. The story of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) is no exception. Over the years, several prominent leaders who once stood shoulder-to-shoulder with West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee have left the party, joined rival camps, or openly challenged the leadership that helped build their political careers.
The history of AITC is filled with examples of leaders who benefited from the party's organisational strength and Mamata Banerjee's mass appeal, only to abandon the party when political opportunities appeared elsewhere. Many Members of Parliament and senior leaders who won elections under the Trinamool Congress banner later distanced themselves from the party. Such departures have repeatedly sparked debates about loyalty, ideology, and the growing culture of political opportunism in India.
Indian politics has long been marked by the phenomenon of political defections. Leaders rise within a party, enjoy positions of power and prominence, and then, when circumstances change, switch loyalties in search of personal gain or political survival. The story of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) is no exception. Over the years, several prominent leaders who once stood shoulder-to-shoulder with West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee have left the party, joined rival camps, or openly challenged the leadership that helped build their political careers.
The history of AITC is filled with examples of leaders who benefited from the party's organisational strength and Mamata Banerjee's mass appeal, only to abandon the party when political opportunities appeared elsewhere. Many Members of Parliament and senior leaders who won elections under the Trinamool Congress banner later distanced themselves from the party. Such departures have repeatedly sparked debates about loyalty, ideology, and the growing culture of political opportunism in India.
Tan Dhesi Backs Labour Candidate Preston in Slough By-Election, Urges Vote to Keep Out Reform UK and Conservatives https://t.co/4KdTQLAnQH @itaranpreetkaur@TanDhesi@Sandhu_Kdeep1