@JayTC53 She's mad Charlie picked Erika and not her. She's mad Charlie talked publicly that he personally left her with instructions of what to do. She's as fake as Pam Andersons titsnin 90's
@TheRealSaraGray@RealCandaceO@paleochristcon You must be stupid because to refute your claims you must still hold those claims. She ceded every one of them. Must also present evidence to refute. She had -10 pieces of evidence. You too are stupid as fuck.
@CFC_lova So much bs propaganda on both sides here. Biggest and most funniest is the freedomel from spying on citizens. Canada been doing that since its inception or permission.
If Charlie taught her how to debate, thats evidence Charlie didnt like her at ALL. Fundamentals of debate is to challenge your opponents worldviews. She thinks thats a legal deposition. Can't say Charlie loved her and taught her wrong when he did it so well.
@RealCandaceO Except you aired it out on X. Time for you to ask him questions, time for hin to ask you questions. You agreed the. Backtracked on camer and now lying afterwards.
2 point here.
1. What evidence? Candace said she never blamed or accused Erika and admitted she had no evidence.
2. She demanded it take place there and signed a contract for them to record and bring 4 people. Even stated had he ran names by her she would be OK. Why bitch?
Two points here.
1. Evidence suggests she did. You abandoned your failed prompt and instead asked candace to defame Erika. 🤣 then when that didnt work you awkwardly played videos about Erika.
2. You snuck in creepy snuggle brown tooth Gerald and allowed him to violate your contract by live streaming in her kids playroom.
If this was my home id be going to jail and you and your crew would have been heading to the hospital.
Disrespecting someones home is despicable.
Stupid retarded bitch doesn't understand logic and reason, simple proof she's a woman. You always leave room to be convinced of alternative theories based in evidence. She stands at 0% chance which means Tyler could tell her confession styleto her face and she won't believe it.
Andrew Wilson lost the moment he said that he was only 75% sure that Tyler Robinson was guilty.
Since when did “Overwhelming” mean about 75% sure… 💀
Overwhelming is “I’m 110% sure that Tyler Robinson is guilty”
Not— “there’s a 25% chance that he’s innocent” 🤣🤣🤣🤣
For every 10 creators questioning the Tyler Robinson official narrative, there are 50 people calling us grifters, liars and scammers.
There is easily 5X as much money going to the "they are grifters" camp.
They are objectively making more money accusing people of grifting than the people simply seeking the truth.
In what world is seeking the truth bad, exactly?
Their ONLY reasonable response is "they are making accusations." Absent accusations, they've got nothing other than "you're stupid."
To literally no one’s surprise- Rachel Wilson doesn’t understand why a woman would have concerns about letting a parade of unknown men into her home where her kids are.
@ClientDining@geraldwayne Maybe because she didn't bring it up. Take me questions he asked if you responded with i'm not responding to it. Those are her claims to defend. Yes, you wanted him to review those claims. She should have brought them up. Any question is worldview on that.
@k6j8l1986@paleochristcon@ComicDaveSmith@RealCandaceO For the brain dead section apparently. Now, if you leave 15 to 25% uncertainty, then that leaves 15 to 25% evidence. You can present to fit in that and grow it and take away from the 75-85%. 0% means nothing. Anyone can show you, will change your mind. And that my friend is 🤪🤪