Dmitriy

Take what is ours
🇺🇲🇷🇺
100% American
100% Russian

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

🧵THREAD: How Nazi Germany, not the Soviet Union, committed the Katyn Massacre in 1941.

In 1943, Nazi Germany claimed to have uncovered thousands of corpses of Polish officers near the town of Smolensk, and consequently blamed those deaths on the Soviet Union. In 1944, the Soviet Union released their own report, blaming those deaths on the Germans.

We will demonstrate the evidence, and how it conclusively proves that the Germans were guilty.

Additionally, we will go over some common talking-points used by the pro-Goebbels camp, and analyze them meticulously.

The conclusion, therefore, is inescapable - Nazi Germany murdered those Poles in late 1941, and then cynically blamed the Soviet Union for their own crimes.

[Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 @InfraHaz]

Leftists in 2016: “Real Communism hasn’t been tried.”

Right-Wing: “HAHAHA! What cope!”

Right Wing in 2026, seeing China: “Actually guys Real Communism hasn’t been tried.”

[Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 @InfraHaz]

The majority of American “politics” has simply devolved into suicidal military nihilism. That is the only “ideology” taken seriously in America today.

Liberal “leftists” wrap this nihilism with “progressive” garnish (Kate Abugazaleh, Graham Platner) about “saving democracy” while Right-Wing cuckolds tell themselves it’s about defending the “European race” and “Western civilization.”

But in the end, all they really believe in is physical force itself. But there is no shortage of physical force in the cosmos. Force without moral authority and a guiding purpose is inherently entropic.

Liberalism cannot provide this, and therefore becomes fascism before “Hitler-in-bunker”-ing itself. Only when those intoxicated by the romance of this decadence finally take that inevitable step, can the rest of mankind be free.

The “power” of the US military will become as chaotic, dispersed, dissipated, and entropic as the wild physical forces of the cosmos themselves.

[Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 @InfraHaz]

Reminder that the US regime was brought to its knees and completely humiliated by Iran, because now they’re desperately trying to make us forget any of that happened.

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

All western orthobro converts need to be shot.

[Michael Orthodox ☦ @Michaeldudufudu]

Medically speaking this is just giant gynecomastia correct?

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

Notice all the replies to this from ukrops:

"Ruzzia kills civillians too!" - The same Whataboutism™️ slop that subhuman redditors have been hypocritically complaining about for the past 4 years in regards to NATO military expansion. Notice how it doesnt actually address the fact that Ukraine murdered 7 people for no reason.

"Umm it was le false flag!" - Genuine textbook cognitive dissonance. No actual evidence it was a Russian drone outside of fantasy. Further: false flag for what purpose? For war, or more extended military operations? Isn't that whats happening right now? Are you livid?

[The Gulag @WelcomeTheGulag]

Security camera video captures the moment a Ukrainian drone strike hit a civilian bus in Russia’s Donetsk region, killing seven people

[Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 @InfraHaz]

🇹🇷 In Türkiye, we watch our enemies destroy themselves with great amusement, while our decades long plan continues to be fulfilled…

[Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 @InfraHaz]

🇹🇷 I AM IN TÜRKIYE, the gateway between the East and West!

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

@United24media "Haha, Rudsia is building brand-new apartments too slowly."

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

Thank you wonderful comrade Stalin for building the Moscow metro system

[Candace Owens @RealCandaceO]

I’m not sure what I was expecting but I wasn’t expecting this.
Moscow is an unbelievably beautiful city.

[Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 @InfraHaz]

For some reason, literally everyone who visits Russia reports how clean, safe, impressive and beautiful it is.

This must be because they’re all Russian agents funded directly by Putin!

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

@Based_Reposts Katyn was a German crime

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

@SForcesKat @FORTRESSMAXXING Lol i was just thinking this. Its the same shit corporations during the early 1900s did to striking labor unions.

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

These are Mormon mafia bosses not dissimilar to Soviet-era kulaks.

If some mormon Lego store chain can be used to influence TWO police departments (these videos were shot in two separate places, Salem & American Fork), what are true capabilities of a company like Amazon or Microsoft? Important questions to be raised here.

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

@CountRoland66 @NordickChad China and the U.S. never had the same developmental timeline, so this is hardly a fair comparison lol

[Haz Al-Din 🇷🇺 @InfraHaz]

North Korea is far more democratic than the USA is.

Don’t think so? It’s because you’re brainwashed.

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

If "capitalism works in China," how come the more socialist a Chinese province is the better it performs by every metric RIGHT NOW?

Capitalists have NO answer for this.

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

@benbackupbackup @starboundellie Lol you fucking idiot, thats what Zhang literally admits in his paper lmao.

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

@YevKopiika Omg you people cant do anything

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

@uncannymannyyt he is very embarrassing

https://t.co/x1IGCDRUua

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

The answer to this is actually really simple, because the graph(s) itself is flawed. Why exactly are we measuring marketization score from 1997-2014 vs GDP growth over 1978-2016?

This means that the outcome begins accumulating in 1978, but the supposed cause it not even measured until 1997 (and CANNOT be, since the marketization index did not exist before 1997 and was zero for every province in 1978).

A province like Zhejiang or Guangdong did most of its growing during this 'gap' period (between 1978-1997), and therefore, by 1997, it was already rich, industrialized, wired into Hong Kong, etc, which is why it is scoring high on this marketization index. The marketization index is merely a consequence of the earlier growth.

Anyway, this graph is largely based on Zhang's "The China Model is Factually False". In this paper, Zhang himself says that the marketization score is the "accumulated achievement of economic reform in the first two decades" - i.e., it is an accumulated outcome of what came before. As such, using an accumulated outcome to 'predict' the process which accumulated it is circular.

I have attached this study for public use in the replies.

But let us look further in this paper. After 2007, the relationship is completely inverted. We see that the LESS marketized Western provinces grew the FASTEST, and that the MOST marketized Eastern provinces grew the slowest. Why?

If we instead plotted the marketization against the recent growth rate, the rate of change over 2007-2016, which is what tells you which model is winning TODAY, the line would tilt the other way.

Further: why are we not hinting at the presence of a confounding variable? If we look at the graph attached, we see provinces such as Tibet, Qinghai, Xinjiang, etc, which are remote, high-altitude and sparsely populated areas which are far from any ports at all. But at the top-right of the graph, we see the opposite: places such as Jiangsu, Guangdong, those that are coastal and metropolitan, right next to Hong Kong and Taiwan, and which were the destinations for the overwhelming majority of the foreign investment which entered China. The eastern region absorbed about 90% of the foreign investment, while the entire west received about three.

Why is it not that Guangdong has better quality of life metrics than Tibet because Guangdong is literally seated right next to the South China Sea, while Tibet has an average elevation of 10,000 feet and about 1,000 miles away from the ocean, but because it adheres to 'capitalism' more than Tibet does?

Is the reason why Massachusetts has a higher quality of life over Iowa because Massachusetts adheres to more capitalism, or because Massachusetts is seated on the Atlantic Coast and has more trading opportunities, whereas Iowa is a situated in the middle of nowhere?

Anyway, on life expectancy:

What actually PRODUCES longer lives? The answer is, of course, clean water and sanitation, vaccinations, hospitals and doctors, infant health care, education, nutrition, and the like. And in China, these are overwhelmingly delivered by the PUBLIC sector and funded by the fiscal capacity of the Central government. A coastal province lives longer because it can fund better things for the populace

And, as we can see from below, the largest gains in Chinese life expectancy happened much before marketization. See this table below. In 1929, the life expectancy for the average Chinese citizen was about 24.5 years. By 1973, it was about 64.5 years. By 1981, it was about 67.5 years. Therefore, a lot of the foundational growth in life expectancy was due to the CENTRALLY-PLANNED, MAOIST economy.

Source: Bramall, C. (2008). Chinese Economic Development (1st ed.). Routledge. https://t.co/oUwMueCIA4

I can't believe I have to say this, but when the government is actually used to serve the interests of the people instead of fighting wars for Epstein and entrapping people in debt, the people's life expectancy goes up. Wow!

Again, these two graphs show that richer and more developed Chinese provinces have higher cumulative growth and longer lifespans than poorer, more remote, and more interior ones. This is simply unsurprising and pathetic. This is true for literally every country on Earth, including the U.S.

[Dmitriy @InfraDmitriy]

@Szymon69699660 @RepMarx1890 "Noo you dont understand we just HAD to colonize western ukraine and belarus because... well because we just had to okay!"

Anyway, your cope about the USSR is irrelevant. USSR didnt do shit to Poles lol.