inkeshaf ahmed

Practising Advocate/Journalist/Opinion Maker/ Mind Reader . Views expressed are personal and RTs are not endorsements, Follow me for all kinds of news updates

[Rahul @sairahul1]

🚨 Anthropic's CEO: "software engineering will be fully automated in 12 months."

two types of people right now:

type 1: opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab. thinks they're using AI.

type 2: knows the hidden features, settings, and shortcuts. runs Claude like a power tool.

type 1 gets surprised in 12 months.
type 2 built the advantage already.

bookmark this. read it today.

[Sunil Gurjar, CFTe @sunilgurjar01]

Never Miss this 4 minute Masterclass how to research stocks.

Bookmark it
See it when you are free and fresh.

[Idris @7signxx]

Your debts will be paid off if you frequently say this Du'a, in sha Allah...

[rari @0xwhrrari]

Google's former CEO just said what everyone in AI already knows

Building wealth is getting easier if you actually learn the tools

Not by scrolling AI threads

By understanding agents, Claude Code, prompts, memory, skills, MCP, and routines

Save this before it disappears from your feed

Everything below is free:

Agent architecture
https://t.co/hhrSyF3y6u

Claude Code 101
https://t.co/71Zu7xQmxc

Claude Code in action
https://t.co/vg8fPChJxl

Prompt engineering
https://t.co/xEu7M3CPe1

Interactive prompt course
https://t.co/oGCxHkqFBD

Claude.md + memory
https://t.co/v6JKlS4OJl

Skills
https://t.co/AJCWlDcMU7

MCP
https://t.co/tQTUYCwN16

Routines
https://t.co/gAnEdq5SP0

Claude Code ultimate guide
https://t.co/WeDLJBVaGM

Awesome Claude Code
https://t.co/wvpwfcaf6U

Anthropic academy
https://t.co/uu3JyZyWyt

Official Claude Code docs
https://t.co/xuUWAfZGXy

All of this costs $0

Most people will keep asking AI one question at a time

Save this and start learning the stack

[Anatoli Kopadze @AnatoliKopadze]

Godfather of AI: "If you sleep well tonight, you may not have understood this lecture."

This 47-minute lecture is the best thing I saw about AI in the last few months.

It will definitely help you understand how it actually works and where it's going.

Geoffrey Hinton built the neural networks behind every AI alive, then quit Google to warn the world about it.

The part nobody wanted to hear:

> AI is already developing abilities its creators didn't intend
> in most cognitive tasks it's already ahead of us
> the question is no longer if it surpasses us but when
> the only decision left is which side of that line you're on

Right now the average person opens Claude, types something, gets an answer, closes the tab.

They think they're using AI. they're using maybe 10% of it.

I went through his entire lecture, then mapped everything he described to what Claude can actually do today.

17 Claude features most people will never find on their own.

Full breakdown in the post below.

[inkeshaf ahmed @InkeshafAhmed]

Wow

[Knowledge & History @xKnowledgeBANK]

The best way to teach people critical thinking

🎥: Jordan.b.peterson

[Rahul @sairahul1]

Anthropic just paid millions to hire Andrej Karpathy.

He gave you the same knowledge for $0 the same week.

Co-founder of OpenAI. Former head of AI at Tesla. The man who coined vibe coding.

No recruitment fee. No exclusive access. Just a link and 29 minutes.

LLMs are ghosts not animals.
Vibe coding is dead.
Software 3.0 is here.

Watch it.

Then read this.

Because Karpathy tells you what Software 3.0 is.

This shows you how to build one - a software factory with Claude Code that ships features while you sleep.

The full build guide is below.

[Idris @7signxx]

A dua that covers every sin.
The hidden and public.
The old and recent.
The minor and major.

🎙️ bymouadh

[AilaunchX @Ai_Tech_tool]

Instead of watching an hour of Netflix, watch this 2 hour hour Stanford lecture will teach you more about how LLMs like ChatGPT and Claude are built than most people working at top AI companies learn in their entire careers.

[Sarki. @Waspapping_]

Muslims on my TL should save and watch this video every time you’re feeling down.

The part I found most striking is where he said:

“You’ll run just like animals run in the wild and you will still not get more than what I originally allocated to you.”

[Idris @7signxx]

21 pieces of advice from the Prophet ﷺ...

[Idris @7signxx]

There is a reason scholars called this one of the most comprehensive duas in the Sunnah.

The Prophet ﷺ taught it to Aisha رضي الله عنها when she was striving to find the perfect words to ask Allah with...

[Jack @Tech_Rose1]

I gave Claude my birth date and time.

It broke down my entire life with eerie accuracy.
No horoscopes. No tarot. Just pure AI.

Here are 7 prompts you should try ↓

[xoxo @accidental_engr]

Most of our brothers and sisters don't know what to say during Salatul janaaza (Burial prayers)​: Here is how to pray Salatul Janaaza.

1- ​After the First Takbeer​: Recite Surat Al-Fatiha.

1. Bismillaahir Rahmaanir Raheem
2. Alhamdu lillaahi Rabbil 'aalameen
3. Ar-Rahmaanir-Raheem
4. Maaliki Yawmid-Deen
5. Iyyaaka na'budu wa lyyaaka nasta'een
6. Ihdinas-Siraatal-Mustaqeem
7. Siraatal-lazeena an'amta 'alaihim ghayril- maghdoobi 'alaihim wa lad-daaalleen

[Radha Tripathi @Radha_AI]

Instead of watching Netflix for 2 hours, watch this guy explain why some people become successful while others stay average.

[Omar @omar_dddg]

This is one of the most unusual sentences in any religious text. In my opinion, the most unusual in any book.

It makes a logical appeal: if it was from other than a divine source, their would have been a lot of inconsistency within the Quran.

The better translation is: much inconsistency. Not inconsistencies.

The root word here is khlf- it means change, not contradictions.

This is remarkable when you consider that the Quran was revealed over 23 years, in organic response to live events. It addresses theology, laws, household affairs, trade, divorce, marriage etc…

Yet there’s little difference tonal drift, or style change. All throughout, it’s very distinguishably Quranic.

If you read any author who has written extensively, over long periods of time, Shakespeare, Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, Marx, Virginia Woolf etc.. you’ll find that their style evolves, it changes, early Shakespeare is very different to late Shakespeare and so on.

Scholars call it register consistency and idiolect stability. Across human authors, especially under duress, these tend to fracture. Dostoevsky wrote very differently before and after his mock execution and Siberian exile. Tolstoy's late work is almost a repudiation of his early work. The psychological pressure shows.

Yet, besides the Meccan and Medinian shift, which was intentional and purposeful, there is almost no tonal drift.

Over 23 years, of which more than 15 were years of stress, persecution, defending against military attacks, the Prophet, peace be upon him, losing his first wife, his children, the period of the fatra, the sieges, etc.. yet, the style is consistent. A human would sway and change, develop with the time, etc.. find better styles. The theology is also very stable from the beginning to the end: One God, judgement day, heaven and hell, human nature, human is redeemable, God is forgiving.

It’s also incredibly unusual as a statement, because whoever made it, was aware of human psychology of authorship. That humans drift in authorship over a long time, which isn’t a very easy assessment to make in the desert, with so few books.
The argument is structurally interesting because it's self-referential and falsifiable in principle, it invites scrutiny rather than demanding blind acceptance. That's unusual for any text, religious or otherwise.

The verse also doesn't say "no inconsistency" or even "little inconsistency." It says "katheeran", much or many. The threshold being set is deliberately calibrated.
So the argument is actually more modest and therefore more defensible than critics often engage with.

It's claiming the absence of the level of inconsistency you would naturally expect from a human source operating under those conditions over that duration.
This matters because it immunises the argument against weak counterexamples. When a critic points to the Meccan/Medinan shift, the text has already pre-empted that by not claiming impossible perfection. The bar is set honestly.
Which is itself another unusual feature of the argument, it doesn't overclaim. Most apologetic arguments across religions tend to assert too much, which makes them brittle. This one is almost forensically careful about what it is and isn't saying.

والله أعلم

[inkeshaf ahmed @InkeshafAhmed]

Great info

[Rahul @sairahul1]

Karpathy didn't make a course.

He made THE course.

3 hours. Free.

Tokenization. Attention. Hallucinations. Tool use. RLHF. DeepSeek. AlphaGo.

Every behavior you've ever wondered about in an LLM - where it comes from, why it exists, how it was engineered.

The gap between engineers who understand this and engineers who don't isn't technical depth.

It's the ability to conceive of entirely different things.

[Vatsala Singh @_vatsalasingh]

डाक्टर ने कहा था कि चश्मा हमेशा के लिए है

लेकिन किसी ने हमें इस आँखों की कसरत के बारे में नहीं बताया…आखिर तक देखें।