Those of us with a high IQ know exactly what AW is doing and quite honestly this is not the subject for people with tactics(including lying)who put on an act. We want authenticity, honesty, truth, facts, logic, and common sense. I will be happy when I don't hear his name on a daily basis.
Hot take: If someone(we'll call him Mr. D) makes a statement that isn't true, regardless of the reason, and then people respond to it and then Mr. D doesn't like the responses, isn't it Mr. D's job to clarify and correct the record? It's not everyone else's job to know or find out why Mr. D lied. Mr. D, If you say something that isn't true and you know it isn't true that's called a lie. You've committed the sin. You can't get mad at people for responding accordingly to a lie unless you've come out and clarified the record or given needed context and then also maybe apologized. If you have to lie in order to make a point you're not very good at communicating or debating and it's definitely not "good faith" debate.
Also not doing a debate when he demands it on the spot last minute is not being a coward. It's called taking the control away from him. I don't think he'd ever do it if the roles were reversed.
Also, in case people haven't noticed, he uses the actual definition of words to clap back. When you said "You work for TPUSA" he tried to clap back by saying you're wrong being he doesn't currently work for them. Work vs worked. He operates using literal definitions and speech and then he'll waste time doing circular arguments to break his opponent down.
The issue is Andrew will only "talk" to people when it's done HIS way. He also says a lot of shit he doesn't actually mean. He keeps saying "context" and "due diligence" and those don't matter because the sentences that he and his wife said either out loud or on X in a post were said. It's not the job of everyone to deep dive to find the "context" when his "context" is whatever excuse he gives at that moment in time. It doesn't matter WHY these conflicting statements were said. They were said. Period. End of story. IT'S HIS JOB TO CLARIFY AND CORRECT THE RECORD. Maybe Andrew should stop saying shit that isn't true? Or maybe he should not use something that is a touchy subject to lie about just to "make a point". Another issue he has is he uses dirty tactics then utters the phrase "good faith". There is never anything good faith about him. Good faith isn't insulting with personal attacks. Doing that is a low IQ tactic and he knows this. He's incapable of leaving his emotions out of debates which is something you learn in debate 101. He also gaslights nonstop. He also can never admit when he's wrong. In fact many times he's wrong he turns it around and projects by blaming the other person. He did this recently in the debate with Candace. We all saw the video made that showed the statement, him saying he didn't say something or blaming Candace saying she said it not him(girl boss)then the argument then the content creator did a rewind which showed the actual statement and proved Candace was right and Andrew was wrong. He expects people to provide context with accusations against him but throws up a bunch of clipped content purposely and knowingly not showing important context. Nothing about anything I've mentioned above is anywhere near good faith. Not at all. I'll step off of my soapbox now but I'll end with I will never debate someone that wants full and total control of everything. What he calls a debate, when you break it down, is really just a conversation but he frames it as a debate so that he can control every aspect of it. How about just having a conversation without personal attacks, a moderator, and "rules" that he himself doesn't always stick to? Just. Have. A. Conversation. No rules, no attacks, no babysitter. Do it respectfully without interrupting. When someone is answering a question and it's going longer than YOU want it to don't call it filibustering. People are tired of the "act". - this is my opinion after watching him for years. I was subbed to him before he did a complete flip flop on the CK case. And if anyone needs context for that statement, watch Baron's livestream where he breaks it down.
I, as a woman, feel like I'm in the minority on this issue because I agree with you. Think logically, doesn't every murderer in all of history have something wrong mentally? Do people actually think that they commit their crimes with a sane and sound mind? This case, if found NG, would set a horrible precedence.
@GoshDarnH@ArtifexMemor@baroncoleman To be thorough, I don't know if Baron is still questioning this or not. I can ask in a during his stream once he comes back from his break. Us jury members don't know what to do with our spare time right now. 😂
I'm a homeschooling mom of 5 with 4 dogs, 3 cats and 2 ferrets living off of a single income. My 19yr old daughter has severe nonverbal autism. I would give my left arm to have just one Rolex I could sell so then I could use that $$ to go towards my daughter's lifelong care. Doesn't he have a few of them? And like 3 to 4 cars? F this guy.
It's Massachusetts. The state as a whole has been going through a massive awakening. The corrupt govt has been held to task by jury findings in recent high profile cases. Hopefully they keep their sanity and positive streak going when it comes to this case as well. Even though the prosecution failed imo I'm hoping they continue to use their common sense and find her guilty.
@MrsDorough@paleochristcon Andrew knew exactly what he was doing clipping that out of context. He's an unserious person who employs disingenuous tactics because his ONLY concern is the almighty dollar. We should all ignore him.
@xdavidcastlex@OwenBenjamin My point is don't come under my comments making a TON of wild assumptions backed by ZERO evidence that are way off base and not even close to being correct and then tell me I have no clue. Take the L and go pound sand.
The amt of written confessions and verbal confessions in a 24 ish hour period is a red flag. The kind of info in the alleged confessions is also a red flag. These two things actually are more proof to me that it's BS. If we're to believe the official narrative this mofo did way more in 24 hours than most humans do in a week.
🤣 I'm a 3 times Trump voting, gun owning, homeschooling mom of five living in Texas and a STAUNCH constitutional conservative. I also have a lot of attorneys in my family. I also read every single filing, multiple times, of any court case I follow. The fact that you called me a liberal three times is probably an indicator that you're not very good at assessing situations.