A piece of butter costs $3, a bottle of milk 2$
We have a good instinct for what groceries are worth.
But when we see a stock trading at $100, most investors have no idea.
Is it expensive?
As an equity analyst, I built The Inside Analyst to help answer that questions.
@Cheesentost@wealthmatica You are right, and the government will agree to that! But in the long-run competition will increase and margins will collapse. This is a classical example of paying 30$ for a cup of coffee (even though it tastes well) :)
@PaulMeedkz@TheRayMyers My concern is about cyclicality and fundamental strength. Here is a short analysis on $AMD, happy to hear contradictory arguments :)
https://t.co/L4b4nD4NeA
@TheValueTrade Of course $NBIS is the kind of investment everybody likes. From the institutional side we monitor
free cash flow
returns on capital
customer concentration
long-term contract durability
All of which must improve to justify further upside.
@StockSavvyShay I never thought we'd actually flag $NVDA as cheap again in our equity research department.
But financials caught up and support the price level.
@qualtrim $V and $MA are both fantastic businesses.
exceptional financial strength
strong competitive positioning & moat
durable growth engines
But they become average investments because they are priced too efficiently.
https://t.co/VPZsO2hy26
I built The Inside Analyst after years of work as an equity analyst and investment banker.
Simple goal: I wanted retail investors to have the same resources and advantages institutions have so they can find attractive investment opportunities.
https://t.co/zemHZC85Sf
@Banana3Stocks From an institutional side we look at $NOW and see characteristics of a growth normalization paradox.
Expectations reshape while the underlying business is getting stronger - usually a green flag.
@antibearthesis Recently looked at $SOFI with the equity research team. Amazing business but economics are not where they should be, given the current valuation level.
ROE, Net margin and equity base to watch.
Full story summarised here:
https://t.co/RuCwFQwqVi
@qualtrim Extending the image above: In equity research we translate fundamentals into fair values.
$V and $MA both deserve premium valuation as the fulfil one important human desire: predictability!
@StockMKTNewz $AVGO outran it's financials
EBITDA ~34bn, growth ~25%, free cash flow ~26bn, ROIC ~18%
All good!
But as equity analysts we also see:
FCF yield ~1.3%
EV /EBITDA ~50x
P/E ~ 85x
That is premium valuation requiring even better metrics!
Some businesses are wonderful:
Strong margins
High cash generation
High capital efficiency
and yet they are still average investments. Here is why?
https://t.co/VPZsO2hy26
Microsoft is a cash cow, but will the heavy AI investment pay off?
This is what ultimately determines if the stock rises or stagnates.
As equity analysts we monitor capital efficiency and capital intensity closely.
https://t.co/TEp7sHM6vH
@brewmarkets Some other fun facts we watch from the institutional side.
$GOOG M&A activity, stock-based compansation, buyback timing, non-recurring items and earnings beats vs misses.
Why? Because they tell us if managers care about the shareholders...
@KobeissiLetter $HPE stock shot up – but the company shows plenty of metrics that still need to improve. As equity analysts we're concerned about:
Capital efficiency below peers
EBITDA margin not stable
Debt rising to extreme levels