Intuitive advisor and empath for 25 years. Helping people navigate relationships, emotional patterns, and difficult life decisions. Insight over prediction.
@EmzTandT@chrisshipitv@ChathamHouse Why do you say he asked for privacy when he did not? Is it a tactic to delegitimize him? It's not hard to find what he actually said, and I am sure most of his detractors know he never said that. So why say something that is not true unless you hope repetition makes it stick?
@soliteire@Jack4Evanss@chrisshipitv That assumes Charles always gets involved. It's possible he would get involved sometimes, but not every time. I don't think it looks good, even if Charles had nothing to do with this. Why would they allow a judge who represented the defendant to preside? This looks so corrupt.
@againstthe71256@richardaeden wow. Do they honestly think this looks fair? What is going on in the UK? Dude, they seem more corrupt than America sometimes, and that's saying something.
@RussellCarlton7@DailyMail This opens the gates for abuse of the Wales' kids who will have less protection when they are of age. Happy day for everyone, I guess.
@nomadirish2@DailyMail So, Catherine and Camila are not royals? Got it. The BRF purchase PR when they are talked about? Got it. When William is on podcasts and takes photos with celebrities, he's not courting fame. Got it. Meghan needs to be slavishly subservient. Got it. H&M's jobs don't count. Got it
@TRUTH6388@GBNEWS@jenniebond1 So the second most powerful man in the country has no power to control a media that mostly gives him glowing praise, but the exiled prince, who could not even guarantee a night's stay at his dad's house, who the media savages daily, is so powerful he forces them to attack him?
@MandyGerseygal@piersmorgan Watching people root for corrupt corporations who are responsible for the suicide of others over people has been the most interesting twist about this entire saga. It's like rooting for Apple over a neighborhood computer store.
@limelemm21@Reuters In what universe is Harry in bed with an industry that attacks him and his family every day? Where do you see this stuff? Because from what I can tell, they want him dead. It's clear as day the media wants him DEAD.
@lawmama5@DailyMail The fact that people think Harry and Meghan are leaking to the Mail and other tabloids they are suing is why I think the UK media knows it can tell people anytihng and be believed.
@GiaGordon13@DailyMail I think the king did a good job walking himself into this trap. He can no longer claim he wants to see his grandkids. He can no longer say they will protect them if they visit. They can no longer claim to have treated Meghan like an equal. I think this has worked out well.
@nomadirish2@DailyMail She's the most talked-about royal on the globe. It's not even close. Other than Harry, you could add all the others around the world, and it would not come up to how often she's mentioned in the media. The last thing she needs is publicity. Blaming her for everything is a choice.
@HelenWh77714086@DailyMail Do you see Meghan there? Have the kids shown up, and we did not know it? Calling another person you don't know vile is such a personal insult. Did she do something to you specifically? The hate they invoke in strangers whom they don't affect is illogical. Why hate them?
@Coops86561560@DailyMail What behavior? All we see are articles written by people who don't know him, and opinions by unnamed sources. Harry never says much. If Harry is to blame for what the media claims he thinks, then the BRF is to blame for what the media claims they say. That's a slippery slope
@NewsHour Please stop. Harry doesn’t write the thousands of stories about himself—the media does. He also doesn’t decide whether he gets security; the UK government does. PBS should be above tabloid-style framing. I’m ashamed to see this, and I won’t donate to PBS again.
@BunnySainsbury@GBNEWS There is no proof he turned it down. His PR team said they accepted it this weekend. It was then rescinded. The palace needs to post a statement that it was turned down because they have not done that, so that's not corroborated.