@kamas716@Slate You are so close. See, the private property that the Hawaii law was meant to apply to was already the private property that invited the public to enter. This isn't a case about private property rights at all, but government intrusion on the 2nd amendment.
@TheFieldOf68@GoodmanHoops Dude is a hack. This is just rage bate for clicks and engagement (that old Irish saying - better for people to talk bad about you than not at all). Don’t bite folks.
@SenRandPaul Introduce away. It won’t go anywhere. Y’all can’t even pass the SAVE Act. Why don’t you work on what’s on your plate before jumping to the next attention grabbing thing?
@WallStreetApes 50310 confines the Legislature's ability to amend to statutes that are consistent with AND in furtherance of that purpose. I think it would be challenging for them to get over the explicit "one-time" and "billionaire" language provided for in the Act's purpose....
@WallStreetApes I think this is a bit alarmist. Not to say it would be impossible, but the explicit purpose is currently defined in the proposed Act as "....raising revenue from a one-time tax on billionaire wealth."
Goethe: "I must hold it for the greatest calamity of our time, which lets nothing come to maturity, that one moment is consumed by the next, and the day spent in the day; so that a man is always living from hand to mouth, without having anything to show for it..."
@HustleBitch_ Now do the Tesla Model Y for those that bought them in 2021/2022 before the price recalibration to the price of those vehicles 2-3 years later. Perhaps just a trend in EVs in general?
I fell in love with this quote:
"No matter your age, you'll always wish you started younger, but today is the youngest you'll ever be. So start today."