The unconscious bias on display by Andrew and many others proves beyond doubt the institutional racism against white people.
In response to the BLM riots in the US and UK in which looting, disorder and attacks on the police were very common, Kier Starmer and much of the Labour Party got down on one knee and issued statements in support of the people protesting.
It’s incredible that at no point do these ignoramuses reflect on their behaviour and the inherent bias that they are displaying.
And this is not simply in their rhetoric, it’s also within policing guidelines and right through our institutions.
Each and every statement like this further proves the point. Nigel Farage is absolutely right and it’s time that we saw a return to order and fairness. That means no more tolerance for two tier approaches. Zero tolerance.
Lastly, a warning: if our political class and media continue to insult and degrade native white British people whilst expecting them to tolerate injustice and institutional bias, division will inevitably rise and the pendulum will eventually swing well past the balancing point.
When and if it does, it will be the fault of people like Andrew.
If they think Reform are bad for simply calling for balance, just wait until they see what follows should they not reflect and change course.
@SkyNews And none of that means that discrimination is involved.
This is obviously due to the fact that people can and do have different behaviours individually and cultures as groups.
This single philosophical mistake is driving two tier approaches and a debasement of society.
This is not true. What we face is worse than that.
When in Africa, these men at least feel an association with and support for their nation/homeland to some extent.
When in Europe, they are actively hostile toward the nation they live in which is fuelled by an inferiority complex and victim narrative.
This is it. This must be the moment when the illusion finally breaks.
The entire left wing ideology must now face the consequences of their actions.
This is what unconscious bias and institutional racism actually looks like. It's time to face it.
Wow, just look at all the insults and abuse from the 'be kind' community.
Remarkable.
Do you think maybe, just maybe; this performative victimhood is a cover for narcissism due to unresolved childhood trauma as demonstrated by your overt expression of negative emotion?
No? Ok then.
P.s; I fully support sensible and decent LGB people
@UKLabour Cool, cool. Out of interest, when is my month of celebration?
I’ve been waiting a while now and seem to have missed it.
For context; I’m a Caucasian, male and straight.
Breaking
Emma Reynolds told Lord Mandelson it was a “big priority” to “build bridges” with Muslim voters.
In WhatsApp messages released between the Environment Secretary and the peer on July 6, 2024, two days after Labour’s general election victory, Ms Reynolds said: “I reckon we [won] at least half of the Muslim vote if not two thirds.”
In response, Lord Mandelson said: “That’s good.”
Ms Reynolds went on to say: “We had some very tough times - being shouted at on the street in some areas and cars pulling over to shout at us. But lots of Muslims voted for me and did so enthusiastically.”
She added in a later message: “Big priority is to build bridges with them.”
Mandelson files released https://t.co/3Z1FYwop93
Yes, I do appreciate that but also, it is likely to turn off many classical liberal centrists that otherwise might be persuaded.
Without thinking too deeply, they are likely to conclude that Restore Britain are uncaring supremacists and not worth listening to.
That's a shame because there are a lot of bright minds behind the scenes.
The phrase 'I don't care' that is often touted by Rupert Lowe and Restore Britain as a way of demonstrating a refusal to tolerate the nonsense spouted by the left and various 'communities' is not fit for purpose.
In truth, those who would use that phrase in that context including Rupert himself care very deeply.
What's actually happening is a balancing of priorities and that's based on care. So the phrase does not work.
For example; Sikhs will be very unhappy about the banning of Kirpans but it must be done. Not because we don't care about Sikhs but because we care more about fairness, order and British culture.
The age of tolerance is clearly coming to an end.
Across Europe and the Anglosphere, we've now reached the tolerance threshold and culture is shifting sharply in the opposite direction.
Just focussing on the British perspective, here's a partial list of what we've tolerated:
- Importation of millions of often culturally incompatible people against our will who are then a net cost to the country
- Public services worsening severely due to being incapable of handling the added burden
- The rape and abuse of the most vulnerable girls and women at an industrial scale at the hands of 1st and 2nd generation migrants
- Importation of hundreds of thousands of unknown fighting age barbarians on small boats that we're then forced to pay for whilst they rape and pillage our society
- Destruction of living standards due to higher wage competition thanks to mass migration
- House prices being well out of reach for the average worker due to increased demand (immigration again)
- Insults directed at citizens who try to stand up for their culture and people
- Degenerate far left ideology harming children and women by spreading gender theory
The question is; why?
Why would we tolerate any of this? The supposed liberal utopia has not arrived and instead, we've got an increasingly authoritarian socialist regime that acts directly against the interests of native citizens.
Tolerance only makes sense if it's in service of a greater good down the line. But there's no greater good. It was an illusion which our political and media elite are refusing to admit.
We're now left with the consequences of the hubristic delusion on the part of our ruling class and they are truly horrific and existential in nature.
Correction is not only necessary but inevitable. Order will be reimplemented. I only hope that it can be achieved politically and largely without significant conflict. Time will tell.
I've explored this in my most recent video. Link in the comments.
@rules_of_izzy@tweetsbygeg@UKLabour Izzy, could you please clarify your position here?
What exactly is it you believe as it seems that you’re insinuating that certain lives don’t matter.
I just want you to clarify.
I am most certainly not ignorant of the serious issues facing Britain. I spend countless hours studying and attempting to articulate them.
My opinion is that all of the rational arguments and the data support the right of politics and therefore, what we need is more speech.
Let the idiots speak. They will do our work for us.
As people actually hear and witness the stupidity and degeneracy of the left, they will reject it. If it’s banned, all it will achieve is a kind of martyrdom which will amplify the unfounded nonsense spouted by people like Cenk and Hassan.
This is the reason that the Green Party peaked and is dropping in the polls. When people are actually exposed to the ideas, they recognise them as nonsense.
Peter, what people are noticing is the very serious demographic and cultural change all around them in their daily lives.
They may not yet have the necessary vocabulary or understanding of migration flow metrics to articulate their experience but they know that something has changed and they do not like it.
People are too busy to be studying exactly how migration metrics work but they know what they see and they are correct in their assessment.
Net migration is, of course, the wrong metric to express the fundamental changes that have been forced on British people against their will as it hides inflows of non EU migrants with increasing outflows of EU and British people.
A better metric to express their experience is the foreign born percentage of the population which is now at historically unprecedented levels. This must become the focus for future governments.
It’s 20%+ now and should be bought down to <8% which is where it was at in the late 1990s before our political class decided to engage in a mass population level experiment that has utterly failed.