.@TuckerCarlson: "Staffers for the Secretary of State of Arizona, ordered by gubernatorial candidate and then-Secretary of State @KatieHobbs directed censorship through CISA...this is illegal. This is a crime. A crime against our Democracy."
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC Marriage has been a predominantly religious institution. It is not a state invention. States have taken it over and successfully twisted the meaning, history, and usage. This is the Christian argument. And the world falls towards chaos when words do not mean anything.
@TedrickG@sfdbi@KQEDnews So city of SF attacks companies providing beds for tired employees instead of making sure kids are safe from fentanyl. Where are your priorities @LondonBreed!?
https://t.co/M7QJWP7u0N
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC It is logical to look at history of use. It is the basis to reason why it's been used for so long. Just like yoga or Chinese medicine, history of use helps where scientific studies have not been done. Etymology is a historical snapshot of words to understand their actual meaning
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC I'm just explaining why marriages were only between straight people in a very logical sense. It was to keep our species alive. That's why gay marriage was not a thing until survival became easier.
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC Your applying the same response which is you believe that traditions and historical evidence has no basis in fact due to it being a fallacy. That can't be anymore from the truth.
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC Again, give me any contrary evidence besides using tradition fallacy. Because that's extremely weak. You could use that for any historical or old cultural evidence. It's non-sequitar at this point.
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC But it provided the family unit which is the cornerstone to humanity's survival. If everybody was gay, we would die since no reproduction would happen. See why straight marriages were prioritized? So we could survive as a species?
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC All of our collective traditions and actions in the past have granted you the easiest life in the history of society. It has brought us to this amazing future with technology. How is that just null and void? Because you say so?
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC But I could say you have a bias fallacy. So everything you say is wrong. You've provided no historical or cultural evidence of any of arguments.
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC Of course, I live with two gay people and they agree marriage should be only for straight couples? Will they be accepted in modern society? They are religious and their opinion is different from your opinion of what homosexuals should agree Tom
@BrainRotArt@ElieNYC https://t.co/noXVoaEOaU
Here's a scholarly article that studies the earliest forms of marriage. Again, notice how it's between men and women.