@swenstone0@UBERSOY1@q751812 I was speaking in terms of iron age european ancestry. But if you define european as WHG+ANF+WSH then yes its higher, but then ubersoy too will be 90%
@swenstone0@UBERSOY1@q751812 Many europeans have slight bits of east eurasian, including scandinavians. West asian even more so, its in all south europeans and some central europeans. This isnt a rare thing in europe
@UBERSOY1@kristofmurai Not true. Sardinians have very little middle eastern ancestry, they just cluster away from other euros due to also having very low steppe. Cypriots on the other hand are middle eastern
@controlcultist Thats the same person in both images. First model is illyrian + anatolian, second model is just mediaval albanian. Medieval albanian is already itself illyrian + anatolian
@DerUntermutt@KinderheimRune Small pockets existed but the vast majority of people lost their pre roman identity. So again what can you call those people ethnically if not roman
@DerUntermutt@KinderheimRune Pre roman ethnic groups like gauls, various iberians, etc ceased to exist as distinct ethnic groups. So what can you call these people, along with italians, if not ethnically roman?
@xfoM9@PureLandNation@KinderheimRune Ukraine is the most fertile but it was under sarmatian, not slavic rule at the time. No way the roman army could have ever conquered steppe nomads in their own lands, it wasnt designed for that kind of warfare