@EhiAcha1@TheGoalsZoneHQ You can’t compare the French side in 1998 which arguably had one of the best teams ever seen with an aging Argentina who look shit.
@JonathanPieNews To be fair though you have to admire the genius of it, he stands down knowing he’ll get voted back, he’s punished himself but will also prove no one cares about the bung. Unless he loses then he looks like a right bell.
@Robbienho_ I’ve always thought Neymar was over rated and has an unhealthy relationship with his sister. Had to listen to someone say how he clears Ronaldinho the other day 🤦
@savanah2j I’ve had to read Americans spouting off about world war 2, beans on toast and bad teeth for the past few weeks. It seems that Banal (google the meaning) comments are happening on both sides of the Atlantic (look at google maps).
@wayooooohh@Heeehooooo@brit_abroad_@Tesco Come on England is idiomatic and as a chant it’s rhythmic so punctuation is usually omitted, it’s not grammatically precise but perfectly acceptable in the function of a sports chant.
@welshjaci@brit_abroad_@Tesco Come on is a fixed exclamation rather than a verb so omitting the comma is perfectly acceptable. Come on, England is grammatically precise but come on England or any sports teams is idiomatic, common and widely accepted as correct.
@brit_abroad_@Tesco It’s grammatically correct just not grammatically precise. Both ways are right but in the context of a chant, come on england is the right way to say it.
@Tgarratt10@WadePlem Considering all we’ve heard from Trump is how much more the US spends on defence over the European nations, I failed to see evidence of that last night.
@martinelliBless Up until the red card, England managed the game better, they were tactically better and if there were still XI on the pitch the game would have been in cruise control the last 20 mins. Mexico played and gave 100% but they were out smarted by tactics.