Daniel Sellers

[HIDEO_KOJIMA @HIDEO_KOJIMA_EN]

As confirmed earlier through our official channels, in mid-June of this year, we unexpectedly received notice from PlayStation Studios that they would cancel the PHYSINT project. PHYSINT is an important project both to me personally and to KOJIMA PRODUCTIONS. Determined to keep the project alive, we have spent the last three months searching tirelessly for a new partner. In the course of seeking advice and pursuing negotiations with people across many fields, we found in XBOX a partner with whom we share a common vision for the future, and we have decided to team up with them once again. Please rest assured that development of PHYSINT, our genre-defining action-espionage title, is ongoing and will continue moving forward.

[🙄Erin 🤔 @MsErinMurray]

I would like to extend a huge "thank you" to the jurors speaking out. Thank you for exposing what the hold out juror was going through with you complete lunatics. All 11 of you should be ashamed and I hope you realize what you have done.

[Sean Fitzgerald (Actual Justice Warrior) @IamSean90]

What everyone is overlooking about the Lindsay Clancy juror interviews. Is that multiple nurses acted as experts on medication in the jury room to convince 3/4 guilty voters to switch to not guilty. Jurors are expressly prohibited from acting as unvetted experts in deliberations

[Thrilla the Gorilla @ThrillaRilla369]

Lindsay chose the meds.
Lindsay chose not to check herself in.
Lindsay chose to get her husband out of the house.
She chose one child.
Then another.
Then another.
Choice. After choice. After choice.
Tell me I’m wrong. 🤷‍♂️

[STUNNER @Cr7Godbrand]

Women were never oppressed. There was NO oppression. What women call oppression today was just PROTECTION.

Let me break it down for you:

1. VOTING:
Women say "we couldn't vote." But back then, voting was not a right, it was a RESPONSIBILITY. Only people who owned property, paid heavy taxes, held public office, or were drafted to DIE in wars could vote.

100% of the people dying in wars were men. You want to vote to send men to war, while you sit at home safe? Makes zero sense. Voting was linked to the DRAFT. You vote, you go to war. Men understood that.

2. BANKING:
"You needed your husband's signature!" Yes, because by LAW, a woman was LEGALLY PROTECTED from debt. Her husband was the head of household and by law HE was 100% liable for ALL debts she made. If she borrowed and couldn't pay, THEY CAME FOR HIM, not her. Creditors went to jail or lost everything - the husband.

So of course his signature was needed. He is the one who goes to prison if you don't pay.

3. PROPERTY - COVERTURE:
They cry about coverture. Coverture meant when you marry, your property merges under ONE name, the husband's, because there was ONE tax filing per household, not two like today. ONE household, ONE name, ONE tax.

It was not to steal from you. It was because the husband was legally responsible for you. If you got sued, he paid. If you owed taxes, he paid. He took your debts too.

These men had mothers they worshipped and daughters they would die for. They were not oppressing women, they were covering them.

4. CONTROLLING WOMEN'S BODIES:
The biggest lie. Back then there were NO abortion pills, NO condoms that worked, NO diapers, NO formula, NO government money to raise a child alone as a single mother, NO good jobs for women to survive alone.

Who bears the most risk in unprotected sex? THE WOMAN. She gets pregnant for 9 months, she risks death during childbirth, which was very common then.

So what did society do? They made sure women stayed virgins until marriage, and made sure men MARRIED them before sex. That is not oppression, that is PROTECTION from becoming a single mother with 3 kids and no food.

And it WORKED. Single motherhood rate was less than 5%. Marriage rate was 90%. Children grew up with fathers.

Today you have "freedom" - 40% single mothers, fatherless homes, abortions everywhere, and women crying that men don't want them.

There was never oppression. There was a system that understood biology and protected women from the consequences of their own choices.

[Writing The Republic @Write4Republic]

The guy is literally just an innocent man and he's getting more hate than a woman who literally murdered her three children.

America HATES men.

[🏴‍☠️LibertysBelle 🇺🇸 @Libertys_Belle]

Dear Lindsay Clancy jurors…Thank you!
Thank you for coming forward and speaking out. Now everyone can clearly see the truth.

None of you were impartial.

The “nurses” on the jury tainted deliberations.

You were using outside testimony from said nurses in your deliberations.

You bullied the one male hold out for days on end.

And you have almost completely turned public sentiment against Lindsay Clancy.

You’ve shown the world what unhinged lunatics you actually are- because you wanted to acquit yet you had to keep reminding yourselves she actually DID kill her children.

God bless the one male juror with the fortitude to hold out for justice.

You ladies are the biggest problem we have in America right now. So be proud of yourselves.

You just opened a lot of eyes.

[MOONFISH 🕊 @moonefish]

Just had a debate with a grocery store manager and it is a prime example of why some people should not be in leadership roles..

Cashier: "May I see your ID?"
Me: Shows my military ID
Cashier: "I need your Drivers License for your birthdate"
Me: Points to Date of Birth
Cashier: "Let me get my manager"
Manager: "Let me go to the office to check our policy..."
5 minutes later:
Manager: "We can only accept Drivers Licenses, Passports, and Government issued ID cards"
Me: "This is a military ID..."
Manager: "We can't accept those, only government issued ID's"
Me:.....points to the bottom where is says "PROPERTY OF US GOVERNMENT, "What does that say?"
Manager: "Yeah, but dat's military not goverment..."
Me: Losing my will to live and about to make a scene
Manager: "I'll allow it this one time..."

[Ella Boo Bella @SummerShaddows]

Actual Africans mocking African Americans. 😂

[Breanna Morello @BreannaMorello]

Your mom says she has postpartum depression.

[TONY™ @TONYxTWO]

Some on the Left said Charlie Kirk deserved to die for his words.

Now some say Lindsay Clancy deserves freedom after kiIIing her three children.

When did speech become a death sentence
and murdering kids become excusable?

Our world is upside down.

[Matt Walsh @MattWalshBlog]

These juror interviews are extraordinary. They are admitting openly that they disregarded the law entirely for the sake of letting Clancy off the hook. There’s no other way to read it.

One juror says she originally wanted to vote guilty but changed her mind so that “Lindsay could get the help she needs.” That is a clear violation of the law. They were supposed to make a determination solely about guilt or innocence. They were not there to make sure anyone “gets help.”

Another juror says she voted not guilty because the prosecution never produced “character witnesses” proving Clancy was a “bad mother.” The problem is that A) killing your children IS definitive evidence that you’re a bad mother, and B) the prosecution would not have been allowed to call those kinds of witnesses. A witness solely testifying that Clancy was a bad mother would have been purely prejudicial. So this juror acquitted because the prosecution failed to provide evidence that they weren’t allowed to provide and which would have been irrelevant anyway. Extraordinary. This same juror even admitted that it was a “fact” that Clancy “viciously killed her children.” The word vicious literally means “done maliciously and with intent.” So if that’s a fact then they were obligated to vote guilty. But they didn’t.

Meanwhile another juror swooned over the defense attorney’s “entertaining” demeanor. And another one said that all of the facts of the case — “everything,” her words — “proved” that Clancy “loved her children.” Apparently strangling your children to death, in this juror’s mind, does not at all call your love for them into question.

Just a collection of the most morally obtuse idiots ever assembled. Amazing.

[Thrilla the Gorilla @ThrillaRilla369]

This should make you angry.
This is Bonnie Pierce, a 38-year-old mother of three from St. Paul, Minnesota. Her house caught fire. She and two of her children escaped, then realized her toddler was still inside.
Bonnie went back in, found the child, but could not get out. She shielded the child with her body. She died from her burns. The child survived.
A GoFundMe for her family raised about $42,000.
By comparison, more than $1,000,000 was raised on GoFundMe for Lindsay Clancy, who was charged with killing her children.
It is a sad reflection of the society we have become.
RIP Bonnie.

[Daniel Sellers @Ironlars88]

@nuhre_ If you insist

[Kait Willett @KaitWillett]

“But men commit 90% of violent crime.”

This might be one of the laziest responses in the gender debate.

I’m going to break this down, slowly, so we can stop using regurgitated words not understanding how ridiculous this I argument actually is.

First: the number isn’t even 90%.

In the FBI’s 2024 arrest data, men accounted for about 79% of violent-crime arrests.

That is absolutely disproportionate.
I have no problem acknowledging that.

But here is where people immediately expose that they don’t understand base rates:

“79% of violent offenders are male”
does NOT mean
“79% of males are violent offenders.”

Those are two completely different denominators.

There are more than 165 MILLION males in the United States.

There were roughly 374,000 reported violent-crime arrests in the FBI data, about 79% of which were male.

That’s roughly 295,000 male arrests.

Even if we pretended, incorrectly, that every single arrest represented a DIFFERENT man,

that would be around: 0.18% of the male population.

And arrests are NOT unique offenders. The same offender can be arrested multiple times.

In fact, criminal offending is highly concentrated among repeat offenders. In one major BJS analysis, just 16% of released prisoners accounted for nearly HALF of all subsequent arrests.

So yes: Men are massively overrepresented among violent offenders.

AND

The overwhelming majority of men are NOT violent offenders.

Both statements are simultaneously true.

That’s what base rates and proportionality are for.

Then we get to IPV, as this repeated statement is used as justification to dismiss men’s issues, assuming, of course, that this is in defense of women

Here it becomes even more interesting.

There is an enormous body of research using measures such as the Conflict Tactics Scales finding substantial gender SYMMETRY in the perpetration of physical partner aggression.

Straus reviewed 200+ studies finding roughly comparable proportions of men and women reporting physical aggression toward partners.

That does NOT mean the consequences are identical.

Men are, on average, physically stronger. Male violence is therefore substantially more capable of producing serious injury, and women experience greater injury from partner violence.

Fine.
Acknowledge it.

But “men can inflict more damage” does not magically transform female violence into non-violence.

A woman hitting a man isn’t empowering.

It isn’t funny.

It isn’t justified because he can probably hit harder.

It’s violence.

And current CDC estimates also remind us that men are not some hypothetical class of victims: about 930,000 U.S. men reported physical violence from an intimate partner in the preceding year in the 2023/24 survey.

Finally, if we’re going to invoke male violence, let’s talk about who actually experiences it.

According to the 2024 National Crime Victimization Survey, approximately 2.39 million violent incidents involving male victims had male offenders, compared with about 1.82 million involving female victims and male offenders.

In other words, MEN themselves absorb an enormous share of male violence.

So the next time someone responds to a male issue with:

“But men commit most violent crime…”

Ask them three questions:

What percentage of men actually commit violent crime?

How concentrated is that violence among repeat offenders?

And who are the victims of male violence?

Because “most violent offenders are men” and “most men are violent” are not remotely the same proposition.

If you don’t understand the denominator, you don’t understand the statistic.

And using the behavior of a tiny, disproportionately violent subset of men to assign collective guilt to 165+ million males isn’t statistical literacy.

It’s stereotyping with a calculator.

[𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗮𝗹𝘁 of North @Itssan17]

Monthly reminder that we haven't forgotten the time when Henry Cavill tagged all the DC and Marvel actors for national superhero day and the only person replied to him was Jason Momoa.

Henry Cavill deserved better tbh 🥹

[Casey Krol @CaseyKrol]

🇩🇪 Likely future leader of Germany:

“In my first 100 days. I will close the borders, eliminate social benefits for migrants and carry out Germany’s largest deportations.”

Today her party had a historic election win.

[Lisa Britton @LisaBritton]

People treat the Lindsay Clancy trial like it’s just an online fight. It isn’t. I sat down in a restaurant on the Lower East Side tonight, and within two minutes the two men next to me started talking about it with me. About their outrage and how they’d lost all respect for the women in their lives who sided with Lindsay—and how they’ve lost respect for women today in general. This case is having real-world ripple effects on how many men and women see each other. It isn’t small.

[Brett Pike @ClassicLearner]

The Lindsay Clancy case shows how feminism has broken society on so many levels, but here is what no one is talking about. All of these moms are overwhelmed and frustrated, can’t afford daycare, the kids dominate their life and they “lose their identity because they had kids,” but before feminism mom’s had tons of help. Grandma was at home, your sister was at home with her kids, and all the moms on the block with their kids, so the Mom’s had help because they would get together. It gave them camaraderie, belonging, community, and allowed them to keep their identity. This is where “it takes a village comes from.” but with so many Mom’s working, that culture is gone. You don’t have your aunt to help, your neighbor to help, all the other moms to hang out with. So moms are just alone and because of that they feel like they lose their identity.

Feminism has taken that from you.