Thatās not a fair comparison.
Yes, there are past US decisions that can and should be criticised. But grouping completely different conflicts over decades into one āpatternā doesnāt make them equivalent.
And it leaves out a key reality, Iran today actively funds, arms, and trains groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis as part of its regional strategy.. This isnāt historical or indirect, itās ongoing, coordinated, and central to its foreign policy.
Each situation needs to be judged in its own context, but ignoring that current role while focusing only on past events gives a very incomplete picture.
@Ja_Aleg0 They should first align their behaviour with international standards, then we can start discussing nuclear issues. It begins with acting like a responsible, stable country, similar to Western nations or places like United Arab Emirates.
At the same time, the International Atomic Energy Agency and others have made it clear that Iran holds large amounts of uranium enriched close to weapons-grade. It is also the only non-nuclear state enriching at that level, with no clear civilian justification, and that material could potentially be turned into multiple nuclear weapons if further enriched.
There are also serious concerns about cooperation. The IAEA has said it cannot fully verify Iranās program as peaceful due to a lack of transparency and limited access.
And yet Mehdi Hasan keeps framing this as if thereās ānothing there,ā while jumping to selective timelines. If weāre going to talk history, letās start with the 1948 ArabāIsraeli War, when Israel was attacked by surrounding states the moment it was established. That context matters, but itās consistently ignored.
And where is the pushback from Piers Morgan? Letting claims go unchallenged, without context or scrutiny, isnāt tough interviewing, it just leaves viewers with a one-sided narrative.
People should actually look this up themselves rather than relying on selective talking points.
Mehdi Hasan is presenting claims while much of the available evidence is contradictory.
Itās honestly unbelievable to watch Mehdi Hasan go unchallenged while pushing such a one-sided narrative, and Piers Morgan just lets it slide.
āIsrael is bombing multiple countriesā? Letās not pretend thatās some random aggression.
Lebanon, where Hezbollah sits on tens of thousands of missiles aimed at Israeli civilians.
Gaza, where Hamas carried out October 7.
Yemen, where the Houthis are firing missiles at Israel.
Iran, the regime funding, arming, and directing these proxies while building ballistic missiles.
Syria, long used as a base for hostile groups.
This isnāt expansion, itās dealing with threats on multiple fronts.
And history matters. Israelās first war was the 1948 ArabāIsraeli War, launched by surrounding Arab states the moment Israel declared independence. That context is always conveniently ignored.
So where are the tough questions?
Why isnāt Hasan challenged when he claims thereās āno evidenceā on nuclear issues?
Why isnāt there any pushback when key facts are left out?
At some point, this stops being journalism and starts looking like an agenda, selective outrage, missing context, and a narrative that misleads viewers rather than informs them.
Medi Hassan said to āGoogle itā⦠so I did. There is no UN Security Council resolution that requires Israel to open or declare its nuclear program. Israel isnāt a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, so itās not bound by those inspection rules, and no binding Security Council resolution has been passed forcing it to do so. There have only been non-binding discussions and resolutions calling for a nuclear-free Middle East.
This show was saturated with antisemitic rhetoric, practically a masterclass in how to push antisemitism while pretending itās something else. Piers, youāve gone from challenging this kind of poison to giving it a platform.
And letās be clear: having Jewish friends doesnāt magically absolve anyone from antisemitism. That excuse is tired, dishonest, and insulting. History is full of people hiding behind that exact line. And yes, there are also a handful of Jewish voices who enable or excuse it, like Professor Norman Finkelstein, who youāve previously had on.
But the most glaring failure was the question you completely refused to ask. How is someone allowed to openly chant āfrom the river to the sea,ā a slogan widely understood as calling for the eradication of Israel, and not be challenged on it?
Why didnāt you press him on that? Why didnāt you force him to explain exactly what he means by it? You expect the audience to believe he understands everything about war, politics, and antisemitism, but suddenly he doesnāt understand what that slogan means? Thatās nonsense.
And another thing, was this supposed to be a show about Ben Shapiro? Because if that was the goal, the entire panel completely missed the mark. Whatever people think of him, Shapiro wins on processing power every time. Heās a prodigy in the traditional sense, razor-sharp, fast, and brutally precise in debate.
If you define genius as raw analytical speed and argumentation, Shapiro takes it easily. Put him in a real debate in front of a live audience with fact-checking on the spot and heāll dismantle both of you before you even realise whatās happened.
Because watching this, it honestly felt like you were more interested in staying in his good books than challenging him. It came across like you were tiptoeing around him, almost building an audience for yourself from his supporters instead of holding him to account.
This felt like pure flattery and cowardly appeasement. Shame on you, Piers.
History check.
Yes, German U-boats torpedoed ships in the Battle of the Atlantic, mainly cargo ships bringing food and weapons to Britain, fuel tankers, and naval escorts. Thousands of ships were sunk and many sailors died.
And yes, the UK and the US also sank enemy ships during the war. Thatās what naval warfare is.
But trying to focus on ships as if it somehow balances the record is nonsense. The Nazi regime carried out industrial-scale crimes and genocide that have no comparison in Allied conduct.
Donāt forget Pearl Harbor either!
On Tucker Carlsonās show he claimed that Chabad is āpushing for this war.ā That isnāt commentary, itās reckless conspiracy garbage.
Chabad is a global Hasidic Jewish organization whose mission is simple: help Jewish communities practice their faith. They run synagogues, provide kosher food, help travelers, students, and families observe Jewish life wherever they are in the world. Thatās it.
But when someone with Tuckerās audience starts pushing conspiracies about Chabad secretly driving wars, he is effectively painting a target on thousands of Jewish community centers and rabbis around the world.
And letās be clear: Chabad has already been targeted by terrorists.
Rabbis and families have been murdered in Chabad centres; in Mumbai, India, where terrorists slaughtered the rabbi and his wife in 2008. A Chabad synagogue in Poway, California was attacked in a deadly shooting. A Chabad rabbi was murdered in the UAE near Dubai. Even simple Jewish celebrations have been targeted, like the Hanukkah gathering on the beach in Australia that was attacked and disrupted by extremists.
These are community centers and families serving their communities, not political actors.
Spreading conspiracies about them doesnāt expose anything. It endangers them.
And the claim that Chabad is āpushing to build the Third Templeā shows complete ignorance of Judaism. Jews pray three times a day for God to rebuild the Temple. Itās a religious prayer, not a political project run by Chabad or anyone else.
Turning Jewish religious life into some global war conspiracy isnāt brave journalism. Itās irresponsible, and it feeds the same narratives that have put Jewish communities in danger for centuries.
On Tucker Carlsonās show he claimed that Chabad is āpushing for this war.ā That isnāt commentary, itās reckless conspiracy garbage.
Chabad is a global Hasidic Jewish organization whose mission is simple: help Jewish communities practice their faith. They run synagogues, provide kosher food, help travelers, students, and families observe Jewish life wherever they are in the world. Thatās it.
But when someone with Tuckerās audience starts pushing conspiracies about Chabad secretly driving wars, he is effectively painting a target on thousands of Jewish community centers and rabbis around the world.
And letās be clear: Chabad has already been targeted by terrorists.
Rabbis and families have been murdered in Chabad centres; in Mumbai, India, where terrorists slaughtered the rabbi and his wife in 2008. A Chabad synagogue in Poway, California was attacked in a deadly shooting. A Chabad rabbi was murdered in the UAE near Dubai. Even simple Jewish celebrations have been targeted, like the Hanukkah gathering on the beach in Australia that was attacked and disrupted by extremists.
These are community centers and families serving their communities, not political actors.
Spreading conspiracies about them doesnāt expose anything. It endangers them.
And the claim that Chabad is āpushing to build the Third Templeā shows complete ignorance of Judaism. Jews pray three times a day for God to rebuild the Temple. Itās a religious prayer, not a political project run by Chabad or anyone else.
Turning Jewish religious life into some global war conspiracy isnāt brave journalism. Itās irresponsible, and it feeds the same narratives that have put Jewish communities in danger for centuries.
šØ EXCLUSIVE ā Tucker Carlson claims that a sect of Judaism called Chabad is ultimately behind the military strikes on Iran.
This might be Tucker's most absurd claim to date.
And it's yet another shot at Trump.
Why? Well, @jaredkushner & @IvankaTrump have belonged to Chabad in DC, and Kushner helped lead the U.S. negotiations before the strike began last week.
As for Tucker's rant about Chabad ā which he helpfully spelled for his viewers ā it is beyond preposterous.
It's also dangerous ā Chabad buildings and events have repeatedly been targeted by terrorists.
For example, the horrific massacre last December at Bondi Beach in Australia, where 15 were murdered, including Rabbi Eli Schlanger, was a Chabad event.
Tucker explained in tonight's monologue that the "real" reason for the strikes on Iran ā meaning why Israel, in his telling, is forcing the U.S. to help topple the Mullahs ā is to launch a "holy war" for the purpose of destroying the Al Aqsa mosque and the Dome of the Rock in the Old City of Jerusalem, in order to rebuild the Third Temple at the same site.
And who does Tucker claim is behind this insidious plot ā and thus the military campaign he called "evil"?
Chabad.
As anyone active in Jewish life knows, Chabad focuses on outreach to its own local Jewish community, particularly to more secular Jews who don't feel connected to a standing synagogue.
But because Chabad is not known to almost anyone outside of the Jewish community, it makes for an easy target of dark conspiracy theories.
That's why Candace Owens has made Chabad into a villain in her increasingly unhinged rants.
But here is why this theory is as crazy as it is dangerous.
Chabad is a loosely-knit collection of synagogues (and related community/educational centers), each run by a Rabbi and his wife, who stay in a given community or neighborhood typically for life.
Far from being structured like, say, the Catholic Church, each Chabad House raises its own funds.
Tucker's "logic" for his outrageous allegations is that Chabad wants to bring about the building of the Third Temple, known in Hebrew as the beit hamikdash.
But... how does Chabad actually to bring about the building of the beit hamikdash?
Through acts of kindness. Truly by doing good deeds in order to "merit" God rebuilding the Jewish holy site.
In fact, Jews have for prayed for the rebuilding of the beit hamikdash ā every single day ā since shortly after the destruction of the Second Temple almost two thousand years ago.
It is literally part of Jews' daily prayers.
But it has nothing to do with tearing down an Islamic holy site, let alone starting a holy war.
It's a prayer asking God to return us to the elevated state of spirituality that existed during the time of the Temple, and more importantly, for Him to send "Moshiac," or the Messiah.
That Tucker would turn ancient Jewish prayers into some kind of sinister plot that is responsible for a very real and ongoing military campaign should be shocking.
Sadly, though, it's not.
But that doesn't mean that it isn't dangerous.
Real people and actual families go to Chabad synagogues, and little kids across the U.S. and in other countries attend Chabad schools and preschools.
It takes just one person already on the fringes to use this kind of rhetoric as justification for violence.
That's not speculation. It has happened again and again ā just in recent years.
Yet Tucker is so blinded by his desire to take a swipe at Jared and Ivanka ā because he knows he can't attack Trump directly ā that he simply doesn't care.
šØ EXCLUSIVE ā Tucker Carlson claims that a sect of Judaism called Chabad is ultimately behind the military strikes on Iran.
This might be Tucker's most absurd claim to date.
And it's yet another shot at Trump.
Why? Well, @jaredkushner & @IvankaTrump have belonged to Chabad in DC, and Kushner helped lead the U.S. negotiations before the strike began last week.
As for Tucker's rant about Chabad ā which he helpfully spelled for his viewers ā it is beyond preposterous.
It's also dangerous ā Chabad buildings and events have repeatedly been targeted by terrorists.
For example, the horrific massacre last December at Bondi Beach in Australia, where 15 were murdered, including Rabbi Eli Schlanger, was a Chabad event.
Tucker explained in tonight's monologue that the "real" reason for the strikes on Iran ā meaning why Israel, in his telling, is forcing the U.S. to help topple the Mullahs ā is to launch a "holy war" for the purpose of destroying the Al Aqsa mosque and the Dome of the Rock in the Old City of Jerusalem, in order to rebuild the Third Temple at the same site.
And who does Tucker claim is behind this insidious plot ā and thus the military campaign he called "evil"?
Chabad.
As anyone active in Jewish life knows, Chabad focuses on outreach to its own local Jewish community, particularly to more secular Jews who don't feel connected to a standing synagogue.
But because Chabad is not known to almost anyone outside of the Jewish community, it makes for an easy target of dark conspiracy theories.
That's why Candace Owens has made Chabad into a villain in her increasingly unhinged rants.
But here is why this theory is as crazy as it is dangerous.
Chabad is a loosely-knit collection of synagogues (and related community/educational centers), each run by a Rabbi and his wife, who stay in a given community or neighborhood typically for life.
Far from being structured like, say, the Catholic Church, each Chabad House raises its own funds.
Tucker's "logic" for his outrageous allegations is that Chabad wants to bring about the building of the Third Temple, known in Hebrew as the beit hamikdash.
But... how does Chabad actually to bring about the building of the beit hamikdash?
Through acts of kindness. Truly by doing good deeds in order to "merit" God rebuilding the Jewish holy site.
In fact, Jews have for prayed for the rebuilding of the beit hamikdash ā every single day ā since shortly after the destruction of the Second Temple almost two thousand years ago.
It is literally part of Jews' daily prayers.
But it has nothing to do with tearing down an Islamic holy site, let alone starting a holy war.
It's a prayer asking God to return us to the elevated state of spirituality that existed during the time of the Temple, and more importantly, for Him to send "Moshiac," or the Messiah.
That Tucker would turn ancient Jewish prayers into some kind of sinister plot that is responsible for a very real and ongoing military campaign should be shocking.
Sadly, though, it's not.
But that doesn't mean that it isn't dangerous.
Real people and actual families go to Chabad synagogues, and little kids across the U.S. and in other countries attend Chabad schools and preschools.
It takes just one person already on the fringes to use this kind of rhetoric as justification for violence.
That's not speculation. It has happened again and again ā just in recent years.
Yet Tucker is so blinded by his desire to take a swipe at Jared and Ivanka ā because he knows he can't attack Trump directly ā that he simply doesn't care.
"I'm an Iranian who lives in Tehran...In case I'm dead tomorrow, I just want you to remember this.
"Please. Shut the fuŃk up and don't use me against America or Israel...We asked for this. We want this attack...
"I know I might die...I'm willing to sacrifice my life for Iran."
Bring him onā¦for once, bring on serious people. Stop filling the panel with the same clowns like Cenk and Dave Smith whose entire contribution is repeating anti-Israel talking points that barely make sense.
If you want a real discussion, invite people who actually deal with these issues, people working or worked in security, diplomacy, or defence, not just talk-show personalities who failed elsewhere and discovered that attacking Israel is the easiest way to build an audience and make money. Right now the fastest route to attention seems to be Israel-bashing, and too often it slips straight into antisemitic rhetoric.
And to Tucker Carlson saying he canāt remember Iran being a threat in his lifetime, the reason many attacks didnāt happen is because intelligence services stopped them. They disrupted assassination attempts and terror plots. But letās not forget the attacks that did succeed, and the damage they caused to Americans and to the West.
Pretending Iran hasnāt been a threat for decades doesnāt make it true.
šØ BREAKING ā SEN. JOHN KENNEDY NAILS IT: "I don't want America to be the world's policeman. I don't want the religious NUTS in Iran to be either!"
"If the religious zealots who are 10 exits past normal EVER get a nuke, THEY'LL USE IT!"
"A fair-minded person HAS to believe that the people running Iran are religious zealots. They are NUTS!"
š„š„š„
H/t @GuntherEagleman
šØ BREAKING ā SEN. JOHN KENNEDY NAILS IT: "I don't want America to be the world's policeman. I don't want the religious NUTS in Iran to be either!"
"If the religious zealots who are 10 exits past normal EVER get a nuke, THEY'LL USE IT!"
"A fair-minded person HAS to believe that the people running Iran are religious zealots. They are NUTS!"
š„š„š„
H/t @GuntherEagleman
Piers, I genuinely donāt understand why you keep bringing Cenk onto your show. As you joked yourself, if there were a hurricane in Miami heād somehow blame Israel. At this point itās predictable and frankly boring, every conversation with him turns into the same anti-Israel rant.
But hereās the part that rarely gets mentioned. Iran isnāt just a threat to Israel. Why not remind viewers that Keir Starmer said Iran has supported more than 20 potentially lethal plots on UK soil in the past year alone? Whereās the discussion about Iran allegedly plotting to assassinate Donald Trump? Or Hezbollah, Iranās proxy, carrying out the bombing in Argentina that investigators tied to Tehran? Or the attempts to target Iranian dissidents in New York? Or the long list of attacks on U.S. embassies and military bases by Iran-backed groups? This didnāt suddenly start with Israel or the United States. Iran has been waging a shadow war against the West for decades through proxies, terror plots, and intimidation.
Criticise the response if you want. Debate the strategy. But pretending Iran is some passive victim is dishonest for any reporter. Iran is a threat, whether itās assassination plots against a U.S. president or terror plots in the UK. Thatās a national security issue. And whether people like it or not, Trump was willing to confront Iran directly. Maybe it works, maybe it fails, but at least he tried to stop it for the sake of American security. That willingness to take the risk is part of his legacy. As for Marco Rubio, heās one of the most articulate Secretaries of State in years: clear, confident, and never afraid to answer tough questions.