@masteroogwgay Anyone familiar with history knows that the Crusades were the most horrific and brutal; the Roman Empire forced everyone to convert to Christianity for centuries.
Meanwhile, in Islam, Allah tells us clearly in the Quran “Let there be no compulsion in religion”.
@jakeshieldsajj As much as I dislike Hitler, But sometimes the truth needs to be said, he did everything to secure his homeland
Especially you know from who.
That's the most ignorant tweet I've read, but I'm not surprised because I know they always fill your kind with nonsense.
Let me correct you and educate you so you don't repeat these mistakes and embarrass yourself in the future. Salafism means following the righteous predecessors, meaning the Prophet and his companions, may God be pleased with them. The term "Wahhabism," which your people invented, refers to Sheikh Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, who was born in Najd in the 18th century CE.
Ibn Taymiyyah lived a thousand years before Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, so how can you say that Ibn Taymiyyah invented Wahhabism and Salafism? Unbelievable ignorance!
If you’re trying to find "contradictions" by isolating the Quran from the Sunnah, you aren't being intellectual you're just being a kafir murtd who isn't following Allah when he commanded us to follow the Sunnah, The framework
1. The "Compulsion" Fallacy
The Verse (2:256): Refers to entering the religion. You can’t force a heart to believe.
The Law: Once you’re in, you’re under the law.
The Reality: The death penalty for Ridda (apostasy) is a matter of atreason. Abu Bakr and the Sahaba RA understood this perfectly. If you think you’ve "discovered" a contradiction they missed for 1,400 years, your ego has outrun your education.
2. The Lashing vs. Stoning Confusion
The Quran (24:2): Establishes the baseline (100 lashes).
The Sunnah: Specifies the category of the Muhsan (married adulterer).
The Logic: You can’t "half a death sentence" in 4:25 because slaves don't meet the criteria for Rajm (stoning) anyway. They get 50 lashes. It’s basic math, not a theological crisis. The Sunnah clarifies the Quran; it doesn't "override" it.
3. The Magic Non-Issue
The Quran rejects that the Message was magic.
The Hadith records a temporary physical ailment.
Prophets get sick, they bleed, and they feel pain. If a physical effect on the Prophet ﷺ invalidates his revelation in your mind, then his hunger or his wounds at Uhud must "contradict" the Quran too. It’s a ridiculous reach.
lastly:
You cannot claim to follow the Quran while discarding the very source that teaches you how to pray, how to fast, and how to interpret those verses. Denying the authentic Sunnah isn't "reforming" Islam; it's gutting it until it's a hollow shell that fits your personal whims.
Allah said in Surah An-Nisa, verse 59, "If you disagree over anything, refer it to Allah and the Messenger."
I can debate you and prove your disbelief using only the Quran, while you cannot.
Furthermore, I don't believe you possess sufficient knowledge to even engage in a discussion about your pagan sect. It would be better for you to remain silent.
So you call upon other than God, and seek help from Ali and Hussein, and you expect me not to say you are not a Muslim? Seriously, what's the difference between you and the Christians who make humans into gods to be worshipped instead of Allah? 😂
As for me, Alhamdulilah, I follow the Quran and Sunnah, and I cannot tolerate disbelief, whether it comes from an Israeli Jew or an Iranian Shiite, and I do not kill Muslims as polytheistic Iran did in Syria, Lebanon, Yemen, and Iraq.
@n28786177780@sneako Yes, it's 2026. Everyone is aware of your polytheism and distortion of Islam.
Secondly, there is no such thing as Wahhabism, you ignorant. Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab belonged to the Sunnah and the Salafism.
@n28786177780@sneako Don't worry about that; I know your pagan, heretical sect very well.
You are the descendants of Abu Lu'lu'a al-Majusi and Abdullah ibn Saba' al-Yahudi.