Please don’t follow this account just to add another page to your feed.
When it’s time for Salah (prayer) and you’re scrolling, put the phone down. No post on this page is more important than your prayer.
I never want this account—or social media—to become a reason for anyone to delay or neglect Salah.
If you’re struggling with your five daily prayers, don’t let that keep you away from Islam. Return to Salah. Keep trying.
And if you sincerely want to learn Islam, practise it, and grow closer to Allah ﷻ, you’re welcome here.
In shā’ Allāh, we’ll learn together, remind one another, and encourage each other towards what pleases Allah ﷻ.
Don’t follow me.
Follow Islam.
May Allah ﷻ guide us, forgive us, and keep us steadfast. Ameen.
We worry about what people think of us.
Our clothes.
Our mistakes.
Our reputation.
Our success.
But on the Day of Judgment, their opinions will not decide our destination.
Allah's judgment will.
Whose approval are we living for?
A question for Christians:
If Jesus عليه السلام prayed to God,
who was he praying to?
Muslims believe Jesus was the Messiah and a Messenger of God.
But God is the One Jesus worshipped.
#LaCasaDeLosFamososMéxico
@Hadithoftheday Hudhayfah ibn al-Yaman رضي الله عنه — the trusted keeper of the Prophet’s ﷺ secrets.
What an incredible level of trust and Amanah. 🤍
Question: Which other Companion of the Prophet ﷺ was known as “The Trustworthy One of this Ummah”?
You can delay Salah.
You can delay repentance.
You can delay becoming the Muslim you know you should be.
But there is one thing you cannot delay when its time comes:
Death.
So why are we living as if we were promised tomorrow?
#Islam#Quran#AskAboutIslam
I had a long conversation today with someone who openly admitted:
“I have no knowledge of Muslim scriptures.”
Yet the same conversation included claims about the Qur’an, child marriage, Muslim “domination,” Ghazwa-e-Hind, conversions, grooming gangs, public prayer — and even suggestions that Islamic scripture needs changing.
It made me realize something.
This is how many misconceptions about Islam are formed.
Not by reading the Qur’an.
Not by studying Islam.
But by collecting headlines, crimes and actions involving individual Muslims — and then treating all of them as teachings of Islam.
I don’t expect everyone to believe in Islam.
Question it.
Challenge it.
Disagree with it.
But first, learn what Islam actually teaches.
If you believe the Qur’an commands something wrong, bring the verse.
Quote it in full.
Let’s examine it together.
Islam does not need protection from questions.
It needs to be represented truthfully.
Timothy, calling another human being “CANCER” because he disagrees with you tells readers more about the quality of your argument than it does about me.
You can criticize Islam.
You can challenge my beliefs.
You can disagree with me completely.
But when your argument ends with dehumanizing the person you're debating, you've stopped debating ideas.
I won't call you names in return.
Bring evidence. Bring arguments. Bring sources.
I'll answer those.
Hatred isn't evidence.
Timothy, the “12 million” figure you're quoting is real.
But “thanks to YOUR cult” is not.
UNICEF says approximately 12 million girls are married before 18 every year WORLDWIDE. It does not say 12 million Muslim girls.
Child marriage exists across countries, cultures and communities, and UNICEF identifies multiple drivers including poverty, gender inequality, social norms, conflict, lack of education and inadequate laws.
It even remains a legal issue in parts of the United States, where there is still no federal law establishing a nationwide ban on marriage under 18.
So let's condemn child marriage together. I have no problem doing that.
But taking a worldwide statistic, assigning all 12 million cases to Islam without evidence, and then calling Muslims “cancer” isn't an argument against Islam. It's prejudice wrapped around a statistic.
If you believe Islam commands child abuse, bring the Qur'anic verse or authentic Islamic text you believe proves it.
Let's examine evidence rather than insult two billion people.
Vrag, I appreciate one thing you said honestly: you admitted that you don't know the Qur'an and that much of what you know comes from hearsay.
That actually explains the problem with this entire discussion.
You've now moved from child marriage, to Rizvi, to MBS, to “Ghazwa-e-Hind,” “love jihad,” grooming gangs, Muslims praying in public, a Kerala cleric, and individual Muslims in different countries.
But collecting negative stories involving Muslims does not establish what Islam teaches.
If a Muslim commits rape, exploitation, grooming, forced conversion, violence or any other injustice, condemn that person and prosecute the crime. I have no reason to defend wrongdoing simply because the offender happens to be Muslim.
But you cannot take the actions of individuals and then jump to “therefore Islam teaches Muslim domination.”
That's exactly the distinction I've been asking you to make.
You posted Muslims praying and called it “seeking dominance.” Prayer itself proves no such thing. If someone illegally blocks a road, deal with the obstruction according to the same law that applies to everyone. But Muslims praying does not become evidence of a plan to dominate non-Muslims.
You mention “love jihad.” If anyone coerces, deceives or forces someone to convert, I oppose it. The Qur'an itself says:
“There is no compulsion in religion.”
— Qur'an 2:256
And regarding your claim that Muslims don't condemn wrongdoing: more than two billion Muslims are not one organization responsible for answering for every Muslim who commits a crime somewhere on Earth.
I wouldn't hold every Hindu responsible for every crime committed by a Hindu, every Christian responsible for every Christian criminal, or every atheist responsible for every atheist criminal. Please give Muslims the same standard.
You yourself said you don't know the Qur'an.
So instead of sending me one negative Muslim story after another, let's do something more useful:
Bring me ONE specific Qur'anic verse that you believe commands Muslims to dominate, exploit or forcibly convert non-Muslims.
Quote it in full.
We'll examine its context and meaning together.
You may still disagree with Islam afterward, and that's your right. But at least your opinion will be based on what Islam actually teaches rather than what you've heard about Muslims.
I'm here for that discussion.
The world asks:
“What do you own?”
Islam makes you think about a harder question:
“What will you take with you?”
Because eventually, everything you own will belong to someone else.
Your deeds will still be yours.
People prepare for exams.
They prepare for interviews.
They prepare for weddings.
They prepare for retirement.
But how much are we preparing for the one meeting none of us can cancel?
Our meeting with Allah.
Life feels harder when you are softer.
So peel away the softness that makes you fragile.
Face discomfort.
Accept rejection.
Handle criticism.
Learn from failure.
Do the difficult things you keep avoiding.
Make yourself harder to break, and you'll be surprised how much softer life begins to feel.
There is no magic formula for a successful life.
Become stronger than the things that once made you quit.
If your #faith disappears the moment life becomes difficult,
was your faith built on Allah—
or on getting what you wanted?
Hardship doesn't only test #patience .
It reveals what the heart was relying on.
@7signxx There were men whose hearts carried the pain of the Ummah as if it were their own.
May Allah protect Al-Aqsa, bring justice and peace to Palestine, and raise among us people of courage, faith and wisdom. 🇵🇸🤲
@islamicstrength So true. Chasing people's approval is a race with no finish line.
Seek Allah's pleasure instead. When Allah is pleased with you, what more could you ask for? 🤍
Vrag, on this point we actually agree: God is the Creator of everyone, not only Muslims.
The Qur'an itself calls Allah “Lord of all worlds” (1:2), not Lord of Muslims alone.
Where we disagree is what follows from that.
Muslims believe the same Creator sent guidance through His Prophets — Abraham, Moses, Jesus and finally Prophet Muhammad ﷺ — and revealed the Qur'an as His final revelation.
God being the Creator of everyone does not mean His revelation must be rewritten according to everyone's preferences.
People are free to accept or reject Islam. But their disagreement does not give anyone the authority to rewrite what Muslims believe Allah revealed.
So yes — one Creator for all humanity.
And that is exactly why I invite you to study His message properly before judging it.
Vrag, that's your conclusion — not a fact.
You call the Court's decision a “defeat” because you already assume the Qur'an needs to be changed. Muslims fundamentally reject that assumption.
Islam is followed by nearly two billion people across the world, across different cultures, languages and societies. You cannot simply declare that changing Allah's revelation is “course correction” and expect that assertion itself to prove your argument.
First you cited Rizvi. When his petition was dismissed as “absolutely frivolous,” you dismissed the outcome. Now you're redefining that outcome as a Muslim “defeat.”
That's not evidence — that's moving the argument to preserve your conclusion.
If you believe the Qur'an contains something that must be changed, name the verse, quote it in context, and make your case.
Let's discuss evidence, not assumptions.
Vrag, you're now adding an explanation that your own example doesn't establish.
You cited Waseem Rizvi. The fact is that his petition asking the Supreme Court to remove 26 Qur'anic verses was dismissed as “absolutely frivolous,” with ₹50,000 in costs.
And this point is important:
You now claim the Court dismissed it because it feared an “intense reaction.” Where is your evidence that this was the Court's reason?
What you personally think the Court's intention was does not change the fact of what happened. You cannot replace evidence with an assumption about someone's motives and then use that assumption as your argument.
If we're going to have a serious discussion, facts need to remain facts and opinions need to be identified as opinions.
And let's be clear about Rizvi himself. Being chairman of a Waqf Board did not make him a Qur'anic scholar or an authority over Islam.
But even that misses the bigger point:
Rizvi cannot rewrite the Qur'an.
A court cannot rewrite it.
A government cannot rewrite it.
A Prime Minister or king cannot rewrite it.
And no Islamic scholar has the authority to simply remove verses from Allah's revelation.
For Muslims, the Qur'an isn't a political document waiting for amendments.
If those 26 verses are really your concern, choose the verse you believe promotes extremism, quote it in full, and let's examine its meaning and context.
That's a discussion I'm happy to have.