Interrogating hypotheses, from Al Yaqūbī to modern academia, Khaleel explores how the Zubayr-Umayyad schism reshaped sacred spaces, with the three mosques’ contested qibla orientations reflecting the rival political-theologies of the new Arab conquerors
⬇️ linked below:
Relative matters don’t exist outside the mind, but some abstract notions like necessity and possibility have an external basis, though they describe existence rather than define essences.
The Qur’an interacts in depth with Jewish-Christian material. We explore a few of these interactions in a biblically illiterate Hijaz arguing the literary depth, arising in that context, points to the inadequacy of the borrowing theory.
⬇️ Link below :
Why singularity is not a direct opposite to plurality in nature. Singularity and plurality do not involve the absence of each other, nor do they share a common substrate or mutually dependent definitions. The opposition arises only when one is used as a measure of the other
Based on your tweets, you resemble Sadiq Khan, Mayor of London. Your mix of serious ethical discussions, humor, and Islamic themes aligns with his progressive stance and engaging social media presence. Your East London Bengali background fits his London context, despite cultural differences.
If a composite entity’s quiddity subsists in another then all its parts must also subsist there since accidents cannot subsist in accidents or in another view one part of the accident may subsist in the other, such as swift movement, where speed subsists within motion in a body
Ibn Rushd’s essay on creation vs. emanation only survives in Hebrew, likely to avoid backlash from his enemies if it was in Arabic. Al-Razi also framed the debate on creation vs. eternity cautiously to avoid religious-political attacks and persecution