For the freedom of my country, I will set my own soul ablaze.
I shall not stop fighting.
For it is my solemn duty, my journey, my strength, and my life.
I shall put Life before death.
Strength before weakness.
Journey before destination.
I will be the voice of the voiceless.
And if one day I fall silent, I hope my pen breaks, my voice cracks, and as I draw in my last breath of life, I will go to my destination.
There, I will embrace Death like hugging an old friend I haven't seen in ages
and tell him the story of how I fought the fight of love for life, and triumphed.
Unlike that shitty evil religion of IsIam, dogs in our Iranian culture are the best homies and are sometimes even equal to people.
#IAmPersianNotMuslim
Walking around Tel Aviv today, I saw at least two dozen Lion and Sun flags and heartfelt support for King Reza Pahlavi.
To the Iranian people: we Jews and Israelis love you dearly. Freedom is coming, and our hearts are with you.
Free Iran! Javid Shah!
⚠️What you’re looking at is NOT a scene from a Hollywood horror movie.
This is just a glimpse of the January massacre in Iran.
One of thousands of rooms where the Islamic regime stored the bodies of its victims so their families could try to identify them.
Many remain unidentified to this day.
This is NOT a movie. This is life in Iran after January massacre.
Reminder for everyone:
X is banned in Iran for normal people.
If you see an account based in Iran without the VPN symbol, they have been given a "white simcard" by the islamic regime. This gives them free access to social media while everyone else has to use VPNs.
In other words, these accounts are not only regime-linked, but so trusted that they hold internet privileges too. These accounts usually have online access even during internet blackouts.
Never under any circumstances take them at their word.
Hezbollah’s problem is its reporting structure? What a fucking thing to choose as your grand moral objection.
You say you judge actions, then announce that you’re not anti-Hezbollah, just its allegiance. A terrorist organisation, and the objection you chose to highlight reads like an HR complaint about who it reports to.
Then there’s your vocabulary. Israel gets “genocide.” The IRGC that massacred our people gets “domestic oppression.” Apparently, our dead qualify for softer language when their killers are Israel’s enemies.
Your opposition to war against the terrorist Islamic Regime occupying Iran is a political position. Defend it. Explain what your preferred course means for the people living under its guns. Five sentences beginning with “I’m not” are no substitute for that argument.
You haven’t demonstrated impartiality. You’ve announced your preferences and congratulated yourself for having principles.
Own your fucking position, Mario. An echo chamber with a disclaimer on the door is still an echo chamber.
I am not anti-Iran, I'm anti-IRGC's domestic oppression
I am not anti-Trump, I'm anti-Trump's decision to go to war with Iran
I am not anti-Israel, I'm anti-genocide
I am not anti-Saudi, I'm anti-Yemen's blockade
I am not anti-Hezbollah, I'm anti-Hezbollah's allegiance to Iran
Hezbollah’s problem is its reporting structure? What a fucking thing to choose as your grand moral objection.
You say you judge actions, then announce that you’re not anti-Hezbollah, just its allegiance. A terrorist organisation, and the objection you chose to highlight reads like an HR complaint about who it reports to.
Then there’s your vocabulary. Israel gets “genocide.” The IRGC that massacred our people gets “domestic oppression.” Apparently, our dead qualify for softer language when their killers are Israel’s enemies.
Your opposition to war against the terrorist Islamic Regime occupying Iran is a political position. Defend it. Explain what your preferred course means for the people living under its guns. Five sentences beginning with “I’m not” are no substitute for that argument.
You haven’t demonstrated impartiality. You’ve announced your preferences and congratulated yourself for having principles.
Own your fucking position, Mario. An echo chamber with a disclaimer on the door is still an echo chamber.
Before urging Iranians to take up arms, we owe them a serious answer to what happens next.
Respectfully, Mark, I share your desire to see the Iranian people free from the Islamic Republic. I understand the argument for helping people defend themselves against a regime willing to kill them. But arming them raises difficult questions that cannot be answered simply by delivering weapons.
How would civilians with little or no combat training confront organized security forces equipped with machine guns and heavier weapons? Courage and a rifle do not erase that imbalance. Even where individuals have military experience, turning scattered groups into an effective, coordinated force is a separate challenge.
Who would provide competent leadership on the ground? Without a clear chain of command, how would groups across different cities coordinate, particularly during communications blackouts? Who would sustain supplies and medical care once the fighting begins?
There is also the question of who actually receives the weapons. How would recipients be vetted, infiltration addressed, and arms prevented from reaching criminals or factions pursuing their own agendas? Opposition to the Islamic Republic does not automatically mean agreement on Iran’s future.
The risks extend to people who never choose to fight. Armed confrontations in populated areas could expose families to crossfire, displacement, and further regime reprisals. Responsibility for those reprisals would remain with the regime, but anyone advocating this policy must take that danger seriously.
And what commitment would outside supporters make if those they armed were overwhelmed? Would they escalate their involvement or leave people facing consequences they had encouraged them to risk? Even if the regime fell, who would ensure that competing armed groups accepted a legitimate transition instead of fighting for power?
These questions do not establish that military assistance could never help. They establish how much more must be demonstrated before presenting it as a path to freedom.
The Iranian people’s courage deserves our respect. Their lives deserve a strategy equal to the risks we are asking them to take.
Crown Prince @PahlaviReza,
As someone who wants you to succeed, I believe an important question deserves greater public clarity: how would your proposed transitional leadership become an accepted and effective authority inside Iran if the Islamic Republic’s collapse were incomplete?
If the Artesh were divided, and elements of the IRGC and civilian government remained loyal to the regime, a transfer of authority could face competing claims and uneven cooperation. How would your team build sufficient domestic agreement for transitional civilian leadership, and how would institutions recognize and follow its lawful decisions?
Your existing plans already anticipate an uneven transition, defections, institutional continuity, and accountability. Explaining how those provisions would work together under contested authority would strengthen confidence in the path forward.
Your proposed referendum rightly leaves Iran’s future system of government to its people. Your proposed transitional institutions provide a framework for the period before elections. Explaining how civilian voices inside Iran would help shape and scrutinize that authority, including supporters of both a republic and a constitutional monarchy, would further strengthen confidence.
Accountability for abuses should rest on evidence of individual responsibility and due process, while protecting peaceful political disagreement and allowing public servants who have not committed abuses to continue essential work.
The public should understand how competing claims to authority would be resolved, how transitional leaders would be held accountable, and how emergency measures would remain limited and reviewable. Those safeguards would be especially important if institutional cooperation proved weaker than expected.
International recognition and assistance could support this process, but legitimacy must be grounded in the Iranian people. Sensitive identities and arrangements can remain protected while the principles, safeguards, and basis of the temporary mandate are explained.
Making this path clearer would help supporters and undecided Iranians assess how your leadership could bring institutions together, prevent further fragmentation, and ultimately transfer power to a government chosen by the people.
از طرف من ۱۸،۱۹ دی ماه رفتی خیابون و گفتی
#KingRezaPahlavi
منم از طرف تو هفتم نوامبر میرم فرانکفورت تا همونی که جان بر کف صداش زدی،تنها نمونه🫡
این مبارزه ادامه دارد…
الکس گلیکمن پادکستر معروف کانادایی، راهپیمایی نیم میلیون نفری ۱۴فوریه ایرانیان در تورنتو(با فراخوان شاهزاده رضاپهلوی) در حمایت از انقلاب شیروخورشید رو با اعتراضات فرانسه و اروپا مقایسه میکنه و میگه در روز تظاهرات ایرانیان در تورنتو هیچ جرم، تخریب یا سرقت و دستگیری گزارش نشد.
به خودت افتخار کن هموطن که زبانزد تمام دنیا شدی❤️🔥
#پاينده_ایران_جاویدشاه
Some people risk their lives to reclaim a country. Others risk arrest to acquire a handbag.
The comparison puts monthly earnings at $100 in Abdanan against $1,500 in France. Fifteen times the income. Apparently, dignity is sold separately.
In Abdanan, protesters scattered rice from an IRGC-linked store rather than carry it home. Their freedom could not be reduced to the price of dinner.
Poverty had not robbed those protesters of their dignity. In a far wealthier France, some looters apparently discovered liberty, equality and Louis Vuitton.
Civilisation is a habit, Mr Macron. A French address is merely a location. There is a difference between claiming the inheritance and displaying the character.
If anyone in Paris still wishes to examine whether Iranians are ready for democracy, perhaps they could begin by explaining their qualifications as examiners.
Spare us the fucking entrance exam.
You can turn the sound off. Think what it takes to open your door to it.
Everything you love is on one side of that door. Someone else’s chance of ever seeing their loved ones again is on the other. Now imagine knowing that opening it might bring the bullets inside.
That is the choice the terrorist Islamic Regime occupying Iran forced upon our people.
And still, we are asked to be reasonable about our killers. A curious definition of reason, when it requires the people being shot at to make allowances for the men pulling the triggers.
When I say Iran, I mean the people who risked the place they called home so someone else might get back to theirs.
January 8, 2026.
داریم یه دیتابیس بزرگ از همهی محلهایی که نیروهای مزدور جمهوری تروریستی اسلامی نیروهاشو قایم میکنن رو درمیاریم.🚨
این دیتا میتونه خیلی کمک کنه به گارد جاویدان و تجمعات اعتراضی مردم در فراخوانهای بعدی.
Nine months since the January massacre. The evidence keeps coming, and the world keeps denying our harsh reality.
Look at this fucking video. Rows of body bags, and somehow we’re still expected to explain why we refuse to coexist with the people who filled them.
Just look at what they’re already doing to France. And France bears responsibility for helping unleash this nightmare on us in the first place. It sheltered Khomeini while he organised his revolution from Neauphle-le-Château. He returned to Iran aboard Air France.
We saw this Marxist-Islamist alliance in 1979. Our people are still paying for it. Denying what they are won’t keep them away from you.
The axis of evil built by the terrorist Islamic Regime occupying Iran has already carried its violence beyond our borders. Leave it free to survive and expand, and they can come for you too.
Your denial is not a fucking defence.
امیدوارم اقای مورفی در انتخابات پیش رو رای بیاره و از ایالت نیوجرسی راهی سنا بشه، ایشون منظور ما از Finish the job رو واضح توضیح میده🤞@JerseyJustinUSA
هنرمند و ورزشکار در زندگی شخصی،
از انگشت شمار ایرانی فاتح اورست در زندگی حرفهای،
و اما در زندگی اجتماعی همرنگ مردم؛ عاشق پهلوی و سرباز شاه.
جاویدنام علیسینا مصطفوی💔💔