@WaitingForPerot@Krispi_Largo@FatherBanana_@RepThomasMassie There are plenty more on the very clear spike of myocarditis itself, which is a significant reason to hold vaccine makers and officials accountable for mandated vaccinations of expediently developed shots without warnings.
@WaitingForPerot@FatherBanana_@RepThomasMassie I went back up to see how we even became focussed on 'athletes'. Anyway if these studies are legit then I submit. I dont have time this evening to vet these later studies, so we can leave this here until I do, or for others who wanna keep digging. Peace either way 🌻
Wowsers thanks for the receipts. And you are right! Not the leading cause, the 3rd leading cause. I think my recollection of it being the 'leading cause' was from outside influence (sudden viral/bacterial infection as opposed to genetic or congenital anomalies or heard disease, etc). [https://t.co/wqMK7XMu11]
I have been propagandized in my life, for sure, but this issue is not yet fully resolved. SCD has always been around and underlying heart disease, esp in certain ethnicities and other background factors, has always been the leading cuase overall. But there was def a spike during COVID and not just internet rumbles, though ofc that happens on any issue. Here is a reliable source that shows this: https://t.co/8G1CqWgWbT
I didnt plan on a debate this evening, but I can say I am very thankful it is with another human being and not a bot 🙃
Myocarditis is the leading cause of SCA/SCD. mRNA vaccines cause myocarditis. Therefore, the rise in SCA/SCD was caused by the sharp increase in cases of myocarditis, of which some of those caused SCA/SCD, increasing from years prior. The studies you provided are from 2018 and 2020.
I am open-minded enough to admit that I am not the specialist. But I do my research, have lived experiences, and make decisions which appear logical to me.
When I was in grad school, I attended a conference where a fellow student (roommate that weekend) privately admitted she was troubled because she was working with her professor on a study for a new treatment modailty for autism (therapeutic, non-medical), and the small team of professors decided to falsify their results to appear positive.
She eventually decided to go with the flow so she could graduate in peace, but this crap happens unfortunately. In her case, it would be a waste of time for parents/therapists of children with autism, but at least it wouldnt affect those individuals medically, thankfully. But this lived experience tells me that people can do these things when motivated for whatever reason.
The pharmaceutical industry undeniably has their corruption, just like all huge multimillion dollar corporations. They fund so much of our medical studies, such that universities almost always complete studies that help these corporations with validating their products which is troubling in and of itself. Few whistleblowers get to warn the rest of us. These are just facts. The problem is that, because you and I are never part of the studies ourselves, we are left to trust several sources for our information. I personally have read news stories about studies that have newsworthy results, but it was easy to see the studies werent double-blind or otherwise reliable. For people who've never taken a research course, or perhaps even a statistics course, how would they be able to tell that?
The FDA has now updated the mRNA COVID shot labels to include warnings on myocarditis - for a reason. If you disagree with that labeling, then all of this just boils down to who trusts who. Then we are left with life experience and logic 🌻
https://t.co/jgeyIKjY6D