ntu amanam

LL.B. | GGMU | APC is a cancer.

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@Erichukwuemerie 😂😂

[PATO PATO🇳🇬🇺🇸 @peculiarpat1]

I once posted that Peter Obi built so many roads and 28 bridges and flyovers without borrowing a kobo, and some data boys asked me to show them the bridges. Here in this video, one can count up to 10 bridges.

For all you data boys who often scream that Obi only "saved money" in the bank, here is just a tiny fraction of so many things he built without borrowing a kobo, while your favorites were busy taking all manner of loans with little or nothing to show for it.

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@doyin_deji @OPay_NG

It's irritating at this point.

[Peter Obi @PeterObi]

Chance Visits to INEC Registration Centres

On my return to Anambra State yesterday, and on my way to attend some scheduled engagements, I made impromptu visits to the INEC voter registration centres at the Civic Centre, Nibo, and Nrijiofor Primary School, Nri.

I was pleased to see Nigerians registering to vote. I took the opportunity to commend those who had turned out and to encourage every eligible citizen to do the same. I reminded them that the journey to good governance does not begin on Election Day; it begins with voter registration. Registering to vote is not just a civic responsibility — it is an investment in the Nigeria we all desire.

I urged everyone who is eligible but has not yet registered to do so without delay. I also appealed to those who have already registered to encourage their family members, friends, neighbours, and colleagues to take advantage of the ongoing exercise before the deadline.

Every registered voter strengthens our democracy and brings us one step closer to building the secure, united, productive, and prosperous Nigeria we all seek.

A New Nigeria is POssible. -PO

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@xygort 🤣🤣

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@ChuksEricE Wait until dem garnish your account first 🤣

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

My guy will be ordained a priest tomorrow, considering joining him.

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@mrfestusogun Become a MD

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@Chimdimma92 Congratulations learned senior 👏🏾

[Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, CGoF @ChidiOdinkalu]

Who said this....?!

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@Sperottii Certainly not stupidity

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@DrJoeAbah Awful

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@DrJoeAbah Nahhh, this is awful

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@instablog9ja He's a liar, he can't kidnap a sitting senator not to talk of a governor. Big, dry, liar!

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@_chibuikem_ @Erichukwuemerie AI na the way o for this devilish administration.

[UptownOfLagos @Uptownoflagos]

Peter Obi actually predicted what these people would do when people like him eventually gets in the field to fight them

They’ll create chaos everywhere, tribal, religious, Ronu, etc 😂

Obi was ahead of them! 😂

[Jibrin Okutepa San @sanjsokutepa]

I have resisted the urge to comment on the ruling of Hon Mr Justice Dashen of the Federal High Court sitting in Lokoja on the NDC matter until I read the judgement. Having read the judgement I am just wondering why the learned trial judge agreed to set the judgement his lordship gave in December 2025 wherein INEC the only Defendant in that case was ordered to register NDC as a political party.

That order was obeyed and NDC registered as a political party. Now an association known as Peace Movement Party PMP was never a party to that judgement. So when an application was filed on the 5th May 2026, the application had two prayers. Praye on3 was for extension of time to apply to set aside the said judgement and an order setting aside the said judgment.

The learned trial judge in the ruling under review set out the two prayers in the motion in the ruling but his lordship did not consider at all prayer one that deals with extension of time to apply to have the judgment set aside. Why. Nobody can hadzard a guess. But was his lordship right. I do not think so. The principle of law is well established that where a person seeks extension of time within which to apply to set aside a judgment entered in his absence, the applicant must satisfy two conditions, namely good and substantial reasons for the failure to appear or defend the action; and show that there is a prima facie defence on the merits, usually by exhibiting a proposed statement of defence disclosing triable issues.

These two conditions are conjunctive, not disjunctive. In other words, both conditions must co-exist before the court can exercise its discretion in favour of the applicant. Failure to satisfy either is fatal. The Supreme Court in Williams vs Hope Rising Voluntary Funds Society held that an applicant seeking to set aside a judgment entered in default must: show good reasons for the default; and disclose a defence on the merits.

In fact the first hurdle must be crossed before a consideration can be given to the second question. The discretion of the court is exercised only where both requirements are met. In Nalsa & Team Associates vs. NNPC, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the applicant must satisfy the court as to:
the reason for the default; and
the existence of a defence raising triable issues. In Skenconsult (Nig.) Ltd. vs Ukey,
even though principally dealing with judgments entered without jurisdiction or without service, the Supreme Court also distinguished cases where the court's discretion to set aside a regular judgment depends upon the applicant satisfying the recognised conditions.

In A.C.B. Plc vs Losada (Nig.) Ltd, the Supreme Court reiterated that a party seeking to set aside a regular judgment must explain the default and show a defence on the merits. In Macaulay vs. NAL Merchant Bank Ltd the court emphasized that both conditions are prerequisites before discretion can be exercised. Are these conditions conjunctive or disjunctive? The authorities consistently state that the conditions are conjunctive, not disjunctive.

The applicant must establish both: good and substantial reasons for the failure to appear; and a defence on the merits. The use of the word "and" in the Supreme Court decisions is deliberate. The courts have repeatedly refused applications where only one condition was established.A commonly quoted statement of the law is that the applicant must show good reasons for his absence and disclose a defence on the merits before the court can exercise its discretion in his favour.

In this ruling, his lordship left out most fundamental judicial function and did not interrogate the reason for failure to apply to have the judgment set aside before INEC obey it. The court did not give us the opportunity what informed its reasons to set aside the judgment when there is no finding on the point why the applicants waited till 4th May 2026 before they apply to set aside the judgment. It appears there are more the public did not know.

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@_chibuikem_ Oh, I shock o 🤣

[ntu amanam @ItumaAustin]

@ChuksEricE Sneaky Peter