TerribleIvan

Computer scientist at day, space enthusiast at night.
I am a sponge for useless information.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@DominicIannopo1 @MrSantiZap I mean, the only really bad decision is Jey. The others, at least, are exciting young prospects. Also, I don't think Brock will screw him on Monday, because that would mean there is nothing to do for Oba at NoC, and looking at his booking, WWE definitely wants him at NoC.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink Alright, I give up, you win. I can't handle your denseness.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink Precedent for what? That substitution is not considered fair use? That's literally the basis for any copyright law. That state of intent does count? That's literally what an admission is. I don't know why you need precedents for such fundamental concepts.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink Ah yes, the court not being perfect is cope. It's not like the US legal system even accounts for that, which is why there are higher and lower courts.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink The court makes errors. The court is biased in some cases. The court isn't perfect. This is just an appeal to authority without any factual basis.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink "keep coping" - proceeds to cope, why he actually isn't the emotional one here, and that actually, stated intent isn't the intent because the court said so.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink That's kinda funny coming from the guy that makes personal attacks because I wanna argue on a factual basis instead of a subjective, "but the court said so."

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink Ah yes, because some court said so, suddenly the definition of intent is completely changed.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink "But the ruling, but the ruling, but the ruling." How about arguing on facts instead of giving different variations of "but the court said so"

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink The ruling doesn't matter on the definition of intent. Are you really that dense?

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink Also, I doubt you understand what intent means. The intent of the actual piece is the stated intent. What you are talking about is the actual result of that piece.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink You see, for substitution, intent counts. That's where the stated malice comes in, as she clearly stated that it is intended to be a substitute for Ethan's video.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink Yeah, a court made a decision that is wrong based on the law. The law clearly states that substitution is not fair use. Just because that court said something different doesn't change that.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@bmwisswell @marky_twitt @deathink Stated malice is absolutely a thing, because substitution for the original is considered not fair use. So if you admit to it being a substitution, you are basically saying it is not fair use.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@MrSantiZap Hear me out: What if Gunther won the title, Oba proceeds to win KOTR, and Brock get's added making it not only about who wins the title but also who retires Brock.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@MrSantiZap I really love the idea of the John Cena classic. However, I really hate the idea of voting on who wins and, in general, the idea of a title. I don't know why they feel the need to overcomplicate this, showcasing amazing NXT talents is more than enough.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@pilater89 @GLxxxvi @Awk20000 No, crazy for not just simply buying candy without toxic dyes. It's like buying a salami pizza and then removing the salami from the pizza because you don't like salami.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@FlerfHerder More interestingly, this should be the case for the moon as well. And unlike the sun due to its brightness, the moon is observeable by even the average person, yet no one ever saw the moon getting smaller as it's vanishing below the horizon.

[TerribleIvan @IvanTerrribl]

@alidemirci @xdNiBoR You are right if you take days, months and years at equal value. However they don't have equal value, a year for example contains 12 months, thus being objectively bigger than a month. A month contains 30/31 days, thus being objectively bigger than a day.