RAND data: 67% of low-poverty districts trained teachers on AI. 39% of high-poverty districts did.
The equity issue nobody is talking about — and the one that's going to compound the fastest.
3 questions every superintendent should be asking about AI:
1. Do I know how my own students are using it?
2. Have I trained my teachers?
3. Have I redesigned a single assessment?
Most can't answer yes to one.
Most K-12 AI conversations start with "which tool?" Wrong question. Hattie's framework puts most AI tools in the content-digitizer bucket, not the accelerant bucket. The evaluation process is broken before the tool gets picked. What problem is this supposed to solve? #k12ai#edte
School AI bans don't stop the kids with phones.
They stop the kids without them.
That's not safety. That's an equity gap with a discipline policy on top.
22-point jump in ELA proficiency. 25-point jump in graduation rate. One year.
Henderson Bay High School. Alternative school in Washington state. 120 students. Significantly higher rates of low-income students and students with disabilities than the district average.
The
Things that didn’t exist last time Knicks won NBA Championship:
Apple
Microsoft
Google
Facebook
World Wide Web
smartphones
Star Wars
Pac-Man
ESPN
Wi-Fi
Diet Coke
Costco
Home Depot
Netflix
Amazon
Instagram
Uber
Tesla
Saturday Night Live
Memphis Grizzlies
Whole Foods
Chicken McNuggets
Foot Locker
Nvidia
Adobe
eBay
Zara
Seinfeld
Capital One
Miami Heat
Skechers
Ben & Jerry’s
Michael Kors
Honda Civic
The Sopranos
Dell
YouTube
Euro
Pinterest
Airbnb
Spotify
Reddit
PayPal
Yahoo
Expedia
Tommy Hilfiger
American Idol
Cisco
SpaceX
WhatsApp
Red Bull
Buffalo Wild Wings
Toyota Camry
Panera Bread
iPhone
Swiffer
Starburst
Chipotle
Chili’s
Five Guys
Lunchables
Monster Energy
Minnesota Timberwolves
Forever 21
Lululemon
Under Armour
Orlando Magic
Care Bears
Skittles
LinkedIn
Crocs
Febreze
Shake Shack
DoorDash
Android
Zoom
BlackBerry
He-Man
Beanie Babies
Reese’s Pieces
Dallas Mavericks
Wheel of Fortune
Bitcoin
TikTok
Blockbuster
The Simpsons
Harry Potter
Pixar
Jaws
ChatGPT
iPad
Xbox
AirPods
Walkman
Transformers
Game Boy
Beyoncé
Rubik’s Cube
Shark Tank
Rocky
Post-It Notes
People Magazine
MTV
Starbucks Latte
LeBron James
iPod
Microsoft Word
Lionel Messi
Hotmail
Friends
Sour Patch Kids
Victoria’s Secret
Hoka
Callaway Golf
Egg McMuffin
Cristiano Ronaldo
Family Feud
Fanatics
Toronto Raptors
Dairy Queen Blizzard
Tom Brady
Survivor
Mr. Beast
X-Files
Snapchat
New Orleans Pelicans
Super Mario Bros.
Back to the Future
DraftKings
Cinnamon Toast Crunch
The Oprah Winfrey Show
Mark Zuckerberg
Oklahoma City Thunder
Taylor Swift
Charlotte Hornets
South Park
Drake
Craigslist
Happy Meal
Minecraft
Uggs
Pokémon
emojis
3-point line
Honey Nut Cheerios
Baywatch
Wikipedia
IBM PC
Gmail
Fox News
CNN
Michael Jackson’s Thriller
Nintendo NES
Serena Williams
FanDuel
Oakley
CD
DVD
Grand Theft Auto
MySpace
Twitter
Advil
Air Jordan
The AI conversation in education is mostly happening one or two levels above where the work actually happens.
Boards. State leaders. Vendors.
Meanwhile, the teacher in room 214 has been using ChatGPT for lesson planning since November and nobody's told her policy.
Built a free 5-question AI policy audit for school leaders writing policy this summer.
One hour. Run it with your leadership team.
Surfaces whether your current AI posture is actually working — or whether you're hoping it is.
Link in bio.
School AI bans don't stop the kids with phones.
They stop the kids without them.
That's not safety. That's an equity gap with a discipline policy on top.
Two NYC charter schools. Same building. Same kids. Same budget.
One bans AI on the network.
The other teaches a weekly AI literacy block from 6th grade up.
The kids are using AI in both.
Only one school is in the room when they learn how.
Henderson Bay HS: an alt school in WA. Mostly low-income. Higher rate of students with disabilities than the district.
Last year they integrated AI.
+22 points ELA. +25 graduation. Teachers saved 4 hrs/week.
The case study every school board should be reading.