If your morals are determined by your religion, then your moral virtuosity relies on that religion being true. I could follow another religion that says fucking corpses is a holy virtue, and not doing so is a sin, now you're the bad guy.
The best logical fallacy to give an atheist when discussing morals is to ask them why it's morally wrong to have intercourse with roadkill
It's dead it will not feel anything, nobody will know and there are no victims
If you ask a Christian or Buddhist why it's morally wrong, they will tell you it's because the body retains inherent dignity as part of God's creation (or the sacred flow of life), and desecrating it violates divine/natural order, harms your soul/karma, and shows disrespect, even if no one feels it or knows
An atheistic worldview of this question taken to its extreme, concludes that intercourse with roadkill is tantamount to masturbation and nothing more
august ◬ 11th ◗)◖
◶
6⁷4℉ (at time.(⑥)of recording} ,,.
grAt(IX)z is
it?
Date: c. 1976
d°◧nt stare at the m00n
⨀n (on)
A [quiet] tuesday
n i,ght |else| él mira hacia atrás
grAt(IX)z
^(reme9mber)
Missing you dearly,
From Michael
@Gratixz Is htmfb written in a fascinatingly cryptic manner similar to your tweets? I imagine its like house of leaves to the power of ten.
A truly incredible mind.