This is just clinical insanity from a 45 year old woman.
And this is on top of an active group chat where @nosoup4knowles Britta Weidner shares “intel” regarding me daily.
Shame on the men who intentionally manipulate her to do their bidding because they know for a fact she’s mentally unwell and will do anything for them.
The judge overseeing her DWI case should honestly just sentence her to a clinic with no technology. It would help her tremendously.
This deserves to be community noted because it is an outright lie.
The photo was not in any way enhanced by AI technology. To the contrary the public was shown compressed footage by the court.
Viva is welcome to continue his descent into Candace Derangement Syndrome as he can bank on Canada’s free health care system to support his decline. What he is not free to do is to lie blatantly and suggest we used AI tools to deceive the public.
Trump is preparing to declare victory, again.
Iran says go fuck yourself
Israel says they want everyone to die.
Welcome to the Golden shower age.
Good Luck
Long Live The Republic
🚨 EARTH-SHATTERING BREAKING NEWS 🚨
A TOP FORMER FAUCI ADVISOR just got INDICTED for helping orchestrate one of the biggest COVID cover-ups in history!!!
David Morens and his co-conspirators FALSIFIED RECORDS… DELETED EVIDENCE… and ran everything through SECRET GMAIL ACCOUNTS just to CRUSH the lab-leak theory and protect the Wuhan cover-up!!
They deliberately hid the truth from the American people while millions suffered and died.
This man sat at Fauci’s right hand… and now the walls are closing in.
Will he flip and throw Anthony Fauci UNDER THE BUS??
Fauci could be NEXT.
The house of cards is collapsing.
Justice is coming. 🔥⚖️
Share this BEFORE they try to bury it again.
This is what it looks like when you have pre-arranged crisis actors planted to control the media narrative, but the exploding mic malfunctions, sending shrapnel through the neck instead of blowing a hole through the chest.
Losing two wars in the same year is one way to end them I guess.
The Western World is led by morons who worship Satan and eat kids.
There are consequences for that, in this life and the next.
Good Luck
Good night
Long Live The Republic
Nothing is more annoying or more obvious of a strategy than to demand a debate without a focused topic. Your gripe across multiple platforms is that people are “spinning conspiracy theories” about the Charlie Kirk assassination. Your repeat position is that the official federal storyline makes perfect sense, and the evidence is “overwhelming” that Tyler Robinson did it. If you prove capable of overwhelming the public with evidence that Tyler Robinson did this, then you would simultaneously prove your position that any and all conspiracies or alternative theories are misguided, wrong, and in some cases plain evil. But if you cannot sufficiently convince the audience that the case against Tyler Robinson is “crystal clear” then you prove that alternative theories are not just warranted, but necessary.
As I have already stipulated there is no time limit, but I am going to ask that we keep the conversation focused by at first dedicating our time to debating the actual case and the evidence you have repeatedly described as overwhelming. Once that has been debated, you are free to introduce and to question me about any of all of my alternative theories, and/or my opinion of Erika, etc. to your heart’s content. Again, there is no time limit. This structure guarantees a focused discussion which audiences can follow while also guaranteeing the time to ask any and every question pertaining to my “conspiracy theories”.
I have just DMed you so we can set up the time and square away any other minutia.
You cannot make the debate claim something that neither you nor I have ever stated. LOL That’s not how debates work.
YOU have claimed the evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming and crystal clear. I have disputed that entirely and offered many alternative pieces of evidence that I feel should be thoroughly explored which poke holes in the official story.
The debate topics should be in this order:
1) Is there “overwhelming” “crystal clear” evidence that Tyler Robinson assassinated Charlie Kirk, as Andrew Wilson and a great many others have stated? (Claim made by Andrew)
2) Are the alternative theories presented by Candace regarding Charlie’s assassination viable? (Claim(s) made by Candace)
I get the feeling you don’t actually believe the evidence against Tyler Robinson is overwhelming at all.
Just a hunch. Prove me wrong.
"This isn't fair at all" LOL.
How can we further accommodate you, Andrew? I traveled to Los Angeles, surrounded myself with 20 feminists for a debate via Jubilee—I did not get to set the terms, or bring in my own team for live fact-checks and yet I managed to get through it with less whining than you right now. I never once described it as "unfair" or as a "lion's den". I literally traveled with one person.
You are debating just one person. We are allowing you to bring a rapper-sized entourage, plus your own camera and agreed to the moderator that you selected.
Would you like us to provide lunch? How can we make this debate more cushiony for you so you don't pretend it's somehow unfair at the outset.