@MattWallace888 1. Apologize, 2. Articulate WHY what you did was wrong: preaching your stupid politics to us, 3. Promise to never do it again and to ban political agendas and discussions at work at AB, 4. Do what you promised, 5. Fire those who bring politics to work. Keep work work.
@TatetheGreats@elonmusk And those ads restrict the news if the news is about the advertiser. Whoever pays the bills magically cannot be the subject of any scandalous story. Better off paying for news ourselves than receiving big money filters on news content.
@lexfridman The Democratic Party had options I would've considered if they'd have supported them instead of using Biden as a proxy for crazy extremists. Andrew Yang and Tulsi Gabbard are both highly intelligent, competent, and "more normal" than either Party's extremes as of late.
@LeadingReport Narratives like this, true or not, look insanely close to those TV re-run conspiracy movies. You almost expect Clint Eastwood or Harrison Ford to show up and solve the cases. What stinks is you never know who is lying or reporting the truth, as everyone's got a political motive.
@GenoVeno73@HunterSprinkle1@bennyjohnson Geno, you would fail any standardized 6th grade level test on the reading comprehension section. You either lack the care or intelligence to understand how the articles you cited have nothing to do with the Biden article's topic. Think harder.
@Timcast@gmiller Tim, come on, man. I like you, just disagree on this. You know this "who defines it" issue is fundamental to your poll's issue. Sure, in some hypothetical universe, you mean the objective definition. But here on Earth, dude, it is the powerful who would decide the definition.
@GregSisson67 @ZuzaZasada @Timcast Shared agreement in society used to mean most could agree on reasonable criteria for what constitutes "mental illness", hence the laws you cite. Today, however, I think the risk is too high for this label to be weaponized against people we do not like or with whom we have a feud.
@Timcast Mental illness is defined relative to "what most people think". By that standard, if you get too ahead of your peers on realizing something of consequence about reality, they can label you "mentally ill" for perceiving that which they cannot by too far a degree.
@ZaleskiLuke@MarioNawfal So letting people express their own thoughts is somehow indication of unfair bias? You're just mad your ideology cannot play God anymore over human cognition and that evidence mounts proving most people disagree with it when free to speak.
@hiebinator @Riley_Gaines_ Fair enough. Tied for 5th place in that event. She still deserved the 5th place trophy over a dude pretending to be a lady. Further she has won 5 SEC titles in her career, so I'd say she's a good athlete.
@MTierneySports@Riley_Gaines_ No one cares what you think, homie. She is a champion. A creepo dude pretended to be a lady to feel better about being a sub-par athlete. She defended her right to a fair and non-creepy life experience. Go away.
@megynkelly Premature celebration. Leave of absence = nothing. Admission of why what they did was wrong and a promise to never shove virtue signaling cancel culture politics in our faces again is the only acceptable outcome. We don't have to like something we find false. Respect our culture.
@Crystal_Ann_1@atensnut A conspiracy either happened or it didn't. You cannot categorically say a theory of a conspiracy--without knowing the facts of it--is necessarily false because of its being a conspiracy theory. People conspire. It happens every day, all day. Why are people so dumb?
@StankaMijuskov1@atensnut So the mechanism of proof is falsely equated to the substance of said proof. Wow. You are utterly stupid. "Some laptop." Go back to grade school and listen this time.
@MattWallace888 You can be your wisest when older, but good health and understanding society's needs (e.g., how AI works) becomes challenging. If you are a competent 85 year old and I agree with your effects on policy, then fine by me. In JB's case, his character is the problem, not age.