@ant_trauma_cop@Based_Boz@patriottakes Yes, the North didn't want to risk war over ending slavery & only brought it up to prevent the South from getting aid from outside forces. That said the South did fight with the aim of preserving it given it's significance for them as one of it's key motives.
@Floki_Vt@ObviousRises What would you say is the % of people who are only upset and talking about this because he is against the war and if he was against something else wouldn't have cared or even cheered about him getting his arm broken?
@Nasdorachi@GaijinGoombah I'm siding with the Imperium regardless of good or evil as it's the only one where humans could rule and be equal. That said if we go with fighting for your species then tau, eldar, & Imperium are all good to the same degree. Making it strickly subjectively good not objectively.
@Nasdorachi@GaijinGoombah Then wouldn't that just put them on par with the craft world eldar and tau as far as who is good? As each of the three's end goals are more or less the same.
@paramounttactcl https://t.co/h7ek4DTQhI
The audio is better here, you can clearly hear the ICE agent ask where is the gun. Just like in the video you reposted at around the 18 second mark. Also do you think ICE would get this close and ask where the gun was if it was still in his hand?
@newyorkshade@WhickTv I mean there are different types of questions, open ended are very different from leading ones. Someone can follow a line of questions because of evidence, or for political or personal motives. Plus leading questions can be used to imply something.
It's giveaway time!
Win a Warhammer 40,000: Dark Heresy alpha key — like and repost this post to enter, simple as that.
The winners will be announced after December 16th, so hurry up. Please ensure your DMs are open so we can contact you.
#owlcatadvent
@Saginowski @Theo_102_@paramounttactcl I know there are variables that need to be considered when taking into account what a bullet can and can't do. I'm not someone who is saying what it should or shouldn't have done. I'm also not someone who misrepresented the C2 information. I'm just asking questions.
@Theo_102_ @Saginowski @paramounttactcl I've not made any claim. I'm just speculating and asking questions. I do have many when the only evidence that is shown is speculation or false. It's very unfortunate I've not interacted with someone with factual evidence I could verify. I do wish someone would.
@Theo_102_ @Saginowski @paramounttactcl So we're going off of assumptions and not evidence we as individuals could recreate and verify the integrity of one way or the other? That would seem dubious would it not?
@Theo_102_ @Saginowski @paramounttactcl I mean he hasn't denied having the details the bullet has he? I don't know who's using that account, maybe it's someone who has access to something I don't or haven't seen yet? So why not answer it?
@Saginowski @Theo_102_@paramounttactcl So why lose credibility for accepting it when it is a possibility after all even if slim, we can't verify it ourselves by running controlled comparisons?
@Theo_102_ @Saginowski @paramounttactcl So, how do we know he's firing a bullet that matches the specifics of the one fired at Charlie such as amount and quality of the gunpowder, condition of the round, and type of round? If we want to compare ballistics shouldn't we account for all of that when making comparisons?